2026 Elections

George Soros-Funded Fake News Op Courier Newsroom Is Wreaking Midterm Havoc– www.newsbusters.org
News Source
EXCERPT:

The George Soros regime is kicking into high-gear to pepper the airwaves with fake news to swing the midterm election to Democrats.

Courier Newsroom — a lefty fake news collective funded by Soros to the tune of at least $20 million — has been seeping into the messaging of a litany of campaign ads used by Democrat “candidates and political action committees,” according to a new report by the censorial NewsGuard, which apparently discovered that leftist disinformation operations was actually a thing.

This week, the outfit reportedly “identified seven video ads for key races in Iowa, Ohio, and Alabama featuring on-screen citations of” what it dubs as “pink slime websites.” Courier became particularly notorious for spreading mass amounts of false information in past elections to manipulate voters at the behest of its rabid, anti-Trump founder and Democrat strategist Tara McGowan….

Recently, NewsGuard exposed Courier Newsroom exploiting TikTok as one of its primary vehicles to sway voters. Specifically,  NewsGuard found that “Across 21 TikTok accounts — one for each state that Courier covers, plus a nationally focused account — Courier has generated an audience of 4.3 million followers and has collectively received 665.5 million likes on its videos.” Its national account boasts 3.7 million followers, which is a significantly higher following “than @washingtonpost’s 2.1 million and almost as many as @nytimes’s 3.9 million.”

Trump administration ordered to cancel taxpayer-funded TV ads– www.cbsnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

President Trump must cancel any remaining television commercials paid for with millions of dollars in taxpayer money to promote his political message, a federal judge ordered Sunday night, even as the administration said the ad campaign was coming to an end.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition, including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, that challenged the ads as an illegal misuse of funds. She told the administration to cancel any remaining ads, including any set to air Sunday night, in granting a temporary restraining order.

“Defendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements” during the two-week duration of her order, the judge said.

The order was in effect as of 6:45 p.m. ET on Sunday.

Asked for comment, the White House referred to an Oct. 5 social media post from Mr. Trump in which he defended the taxpayer-funded ads as “rather standard” but, amid backlash, said he would pay for them from his political fundraising. In a court filing late Saturday, the Justice Department argued that the temporary restraining order was unnecessary because “the alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.”

The Department of Homeland Security tapped $20 million in taxpayer money for the ads. Legal experts have suggested that violated a federal statute against congressionally appropriated money being used for “publicity or propaganda” and potentially other laws.

“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” the plaintiffs said in a statement issued by Democracy Forward, the nonprofit legal organization that represents them. “There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.”

Trump administration ordered to cancel taxpayer-funded TV ads– www.cbsnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

President Trump must cancel any remaining television commercials paid for with millions of dollars in taxpayer money to promote his political message, a federal judge ordered Sunday night, even as the administration said the ad campaign was coming to an end.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon in New York sided with a coalition, including the nonpartisan watchdog Common Cause, that challenged the ads as an illegal misuse of funds. She told the administration to cancel any remaining ads, including any set to air Sunday night, in granting a temporary restraining order.

“Defendants shall not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements” during the two-week duration of her order, the judge said.

The order was in effect as of 6:45 p.m. ET on Sunday.

Asked for comment, the White House referred to an Oct. 5 social media post from Mr. Trump in which he defended the taxpayer-funded ads as “rather standard” but, amid backlash, said he would pay for them from his political fundraising. In a court filing late Saturday, the Justice Department argued that the temporary restraining order was unnecessary because “the alleged offending conduct will end tomorrow.”

The Department of Homeland Security tapped $20 million in taxpayer money for the ads. Legal experts have suggested that violated a federal statute against congressionally appropriated money being used for “publicity or propaganda” and potentially other laws.

“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” the plaintiffs said in a statement issued by Democracy Forward, the nonprofit legal organization that represents them. “There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda.”

Breaking: Viral Recording Appears to Place Talarico at Ohio Psych Facility During Long Absence Despite Denial– www.westernjournal.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

New unconfirmed social media reports seemingly indicate Democratic U.S. Senate candidate James Talarico of Texas has spent time at an Ohio mental health facility during his noticeable near-two week absence amid his hotly contested campaign.

Talarico’s team claimed he had a “nasty case of the flu” and had been “home in bed,” according to The New York Times.

Commentator Rhein Amacher posted on X that he put in a call to the Lindner Center of Hope in Mason, Ohio, “to determine whether Talarico was or had previously been a patient.”

“During my recorded call, an individual identifying themselves as a female facility employee reportedly stated that Talarico was no longer a patient and had been discharged within the previous 24–48 hours,” he wrote.

“Texans deserve accurate, independently verified information about candidates seeking to represent them in the U.S. Senate. The stakes are too high for speculation.”

Mail theft, scattered ballots along roadside raise concerns about mail-in voting in California: report | The Post Millennial– thepostmillennial.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

“This discovery really shows we have to have greater concern for the chain of custody of ballots.”

Concerns about the security of mail-in voting in California are mounting after election mail was found scattered along a roadside. A separate region in the state also saw a theft targeting a US Postal Service truck just one month before the November midterm elections.

According to ABC 10 News, dozens of pieces of election mail, including signed and unsigned mail-in ballots, were discovered scattered along Lake Wholford Road in San Deigo’s North County region last Thursday morning. Scott Harmes, a local resident, stopped to investigate after hearing of the discovery. He said the mail was spread across the road and did not look as though a mailbag simply fell out of a USPS truck.

“The way they were spread out it almost looks like they were thrown out the window of a car,” Harmes said.

“Obviously there was a huge problem, because these didn’t get to the voter. Is it negligence? Malfeasance?” he added. “This discovery really shows we have to have greater concern for the chain of custody of ballots.”

James Talarico Is No Fan of Columbus Day– townhall.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Democrat Senate candidate James Talarico doesn’t appear to be a big fan of the discoverer of the Americas, the great Christopher Columbus.

In a web interview uploaded to Instagram and YouTube with Democrat darling Beto O’Rourke, Talarico remarked “I know it’s Indigenous Peoples Day, so some folks have off of work.”

The move to rebrand Columbus Day has been pursued by radical leftists to “[recognize] the resilience and diversity of Indigenous Peoples in the United States” and to stop celebrations of one of Europe’s greatest navigators because of “the past and the ongoing effects of colonialism today.” Advocacy groups have encouraged the complete erasure of Columbus Day in favor of Indigenous Peoples Day.

Talarico’s views weren’t isolated to 2023. In 2019, Talarico told a congregation that the American flag was a “complicated symbol.” One year later, Talarico would describe whiteness as a “virus” which is spread “wherever we go.” The only cure, according to Talarico, is to proclaim “loudly and unequivocally that Black Lives Matter.”

Lone Star Liberty PAC, a pro-Ken Paxton group, has uploaded a meme from an iconic scene in The Sopranos to hit back at Talarico’s take.

With Senate majority up for grabs, candidates fight for ‘kingmaker’ voters– www.latimes.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

With the midterm elections just over three weeks away, the fight for control of the U.S. Senate is intensifying in battleground states, as Democrats push into red regions and Republicans pour money into key contests.

Campaigns are entering a crucial stretch for persuading the independent voters who will probably determine outcomes in swing races. Nearly all of the most competitive Senate races are in states with significant swaths of people unaffiliated with either major party — the “kingmakers” in these high-stakes midterms, said Jeremy Gruber, an independent-voting expert.

“Independent voters are going to be deciding this election in every respect,” said Gruber, senior vice president of Open Primaries, an organization that advocates for states to open primary elections to unaffiliated voters.

The urgency around courting nonaligned voters has been on display at recent debates, in ads flooding the airwaves and in the campaign money pouring into key states. For Republicans, it has become an effort to put distance between themselves and President Trump; for Democrats, it’s often a rhetorical shift toward the center and away from the far left.

In Iowa, Republican Ashley Hinson used a Wednesday night debate to emphasize her willingness to break with Trump. In Kansas, Democrat Adam Hamilton is circulating a video in which he describes himself as both liberal and conservative. In Alaska, a GOP-backed ad blitz launched last week aims to persuade voters that Democrat Mary Peltola isn’t independent-minded.

Abdul El-Sayed Turns The Tables On Kristen Welker When She Tries To Divide Democrats– www.politicususa.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Abdul El-Sayed was the Democratic non-incumbent Senate candidate that Republicans wanted to run against in the general election. Republicans were flat-out giddy when El-Sayed won the Democratic primary for Michigan’s open Senate seat, but things have not gone as well or as easily as Republicans expected.

El-Sayed has shown himself to be a good campaigner and an even better communicator.

There were many questions that Meet The Press’s Kristen Welker could have begun her interview with El-Sayed with. The number one issue on the minds of voters is the economy. Welker could have asked about gas prices, diesel prices, inflation, or any other economic that is front and center.

Abdul El-Sayed Turns The Tables On Kristen Welker When She Tries To Divide Democrats– www.politicususa.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Abdul El-Sayed was the Democratic non-incumbent Senate candidate that Republicans wanted to run against in the general election. Republicans were flat-out giddy when El-Sayed won the Democratic primary for Michigan’s open Senate seat, but things have not gone as well or as easily as Republicans expected.

El-Sayed has shown himself to be a good campaigner and an even better communicator.

There were many questions that Meet The Press’s Kristen Welker could have begun her interview with El-Sayed with. The number one issue on the minds of voters is the economy. Welker could have asked about gas prices, diesel prices, inflation, or any other economic that is front and center.

Blurb:

SHELBY TOWNSHIP, Mich. (AP) — Walter Usakowski was mowing his lawn in a northern suburb of Detroit when three canvassers from the United Auto Workers approached.

“I don’t even need to talk to you,” Usakowski said. As a retired member, he was already supporting the union’s slate of Democratic candidates in the Nov. 3 midterms.

Article continues below this ad

But he is not sure how many of the other “guys in the shop” will vote for Democrats. He worked at Ford Motor Co.’s Sterling Axle Plant for more than 45 years, and he knows many members who backed Republican President Donald Trump.

The election-year canvassing was one part of the UAW’s efforts to reassert its political power in Michigan, a premier political battleground. Although the union generally backs Democrats, its membership is more divided over which party best represents working-class interests. It also is reckoning with past corruption scandals, a drop in membership and a lack of transparency that has eroded trust within its ranks.

“It’s not going to be an overnight thing,” said JJ Jewell, who is part of the UAW’s Community Action Program executive committee. “Even if this election goes fantastically, that’s not mission accomplished. That means we’re 1% of the way done.”

James Talarico’s Woke Insanity Claims The Bible Supports Killing Babies in Abortions– www.lifenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

U.S. Senate candidate for Texas James Talarico had just begun voicing regret over his past statements that there are six genders, that men should play in women’s sports, and that “God is nonbinary.” Then Talarico’s lesbian “minister” was caught on camera with an entirely different spin, telling an undercover journalist that his newfound moderation is all a lie to get more votes.

Texas voters are right to be concerned that his campaign’s “Christian” packaging is false advertising. So, let’s check his record.

Talarico made his name as the progressive “Christian” alternative to Republican Ken Paxton, the current Texas attorney general, who has been endorsed by President Donald Trump.

As a member of the Texas House of Representatives, Talarico voted against SB 14, the law protecting minors from mutilating gender surgeries and sterilizing puberty blockers. Now he claims he only opposed certain parts of the bill and wanted to see amendments before he could vote for it.

His record on women’s sports tells the same story. In 2021, Talarico voted against HB 25, the Texas law requiring student athletes in public schools to compete on teams that match their biological sex. Back then, he didn’t talk about amendments. He told his colleagues, “You can’t compromise with hate,” and argued that “some things are more important than perfectly fair competition in sports.”

Now that he’s running statewide, Talarico says he will oppose trans athletes playing in girls’ sports “if it risks safety or fairness.” That little word “if” is doing a lot of work. It means Talarico reserves the right to decide when it’s “fair” and “safe” for a boy to compete against girls and share their locker room, and in those cases, he’s fine with it.

But here’s the truth: it is always unfair for men to play against women, and men in women’s sports always endanger women.

God made us male and female, equally loved, differently formed. No amount of political denial of that reality changes the reality God created, nor the level of hurt women will face because of transgender ideology. To deny our natural state, made in God’s image, is to deny God Himself.

Talarico’s disconnection from reality — and from Biblical principles — goes beyond the gender issue to the most basic right we all have: life.

Talarico has claimed that abortion and gay marriage are mentioned nowhere in the Bible. This is an embarrassingly debunkable statement, one that we at Students for Life Action (SFLAction) exposed months ago with the copious Bible verses defining humans as male and female, husband and wife, and revealing God’s intention for our lives before we are even in the womb.

While Talarico does not seem committed to what Scripture actually says, many who attend church do care.

That’s why our student leaders went to Talarico’s own church, stood outside, and left flyers on the cars of the worshippers inside. It was the first stop in our campaign to reach more than 100 churches, reminding the faithful of Biblical truth: Life begins at conception, God abhors murder, and He made every one of us in His image, male and female.

Certainly, Talarico’s radical theology is an effort to cut into the pro-life, pro-faith voters who consistently vote Republican. As ABC News noted, many Democrats are trying to reclaim the faith conversation for their political ambitions.

But we’ve seen this before. After values voters helped decide the 2004 election, Democrats turned to progressive activist Rev. Jim Wallis. He wrote a bestselling book, God’s Politics, took it on a national tour, and went to Capitol Hill teaching Democrats how to talk to Christians and campaign for their votes.

More than 20 years later, Democrats still can’t figure it out, because they aren’t true believers. Even Wallis admitted at the time, “It’s so transparent when somebody is being inauthentic about religion.” Talarico is just the 2026 version of a decades-old Democratic problem. And it’s hard to reclaim the faith conversation when your apologetics are about explaining why the Bible doesn’t mean what it says.

The race is tight. And as Talarico has struggled under the weight of his past lunacy, notice where he went to clean it up. He didn’t go to MSNOW or The Nation, the Leftist outlets his base trusts. He went to Fox News to tell conservative voters not to believe what they have heard him say in interview clips.

Meanwhile, in far-Left circles, he is actively working to appeal to radical pro-abortion, pro-child-mutilation socialists by repeating their messaging. He recently went viral talking about his favorite drag queen. And in a private Zoom call with the far-Left Austin Sierra Club, Talarico spoke of dismantling capitalism, climate change doomerism, and our country being one of white supremacy and billionaire-contrived class warfare, reports Townhall.

This is not a genuine change of heart; it’s voter-segmented packaging, built on the hope that liberals won’t watch Fox and conservatives will believe he doesn’t really mean what he says.

Jesus cares about truth. In John 14:6, we read: “Jesus said…, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.’”

Talarico can’t even agree on that, saying all faiths are “equal pathways to truth.”

So, to answer the New York Times question, “Can James Talarico Reclaim Christianity for the Left?” the answer is no. Telling people that God doesn’t mean what He says is the oldest trick in Scripture. It started in the Garden, with a serpent asking Eve, “Did God really say…?”

Christian voters should not be fooled. Talarico is a radical leftist who is saying whatever gets him elected. His own people don’t even buy what he is selling to voters.

 

 

Shock Polls: Dems TWICE As Likely to Support Hitler, and Trump’s Popularity Soars With Young Voters – PJ Media– pjmedia.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Turns out that one of the biggest signs your spouse is cheating on you is when he or she suddenly accuses YOU of cheating.

(Assuming, of course, that you’re not actually cheating. ‘Cause if you are, your spouse is just being observant.)

Accusing someone of what you’re guilty of is a “tell” — a not-so-subtle form of self-incrimination, because our accusations are a defense mechanism. They’re psychological projections that hide our demons — a very specific, uniquely tailored smokescreen.

In other words, every accusation is a confession.

This is why I can’t wait for Sept. 15, 2027. (Shame it doesn’t fall on Oktoberfest.) Because that’s the day “literally Hitler” will finally out-Hitler the real Hitler.

Donald Trump announced he was running for president on June 16, 2015. Immediately thereafter, the media compared him to Adolf Hitler — and the blitzkrieg hasn’t gestoppt. Trump’s been branded “literally Hitler” so many times, it’s become a cliché.

And June 16, 2015 was [checks watch] 4,131 days ago.

Meanwhile, Hitler’s reign lasted precisely 4,473 days. (It ended with a bang.) This means that, on Sept. 15, 2027, Donald Trump will be the new record holder: Heil to the chief!

He’ll be the longest-reigning Hitler in Hitler history!

Hitler, Hitler, Hitler. That’s been the media narrative from day one: Trump is “literally Hitler,” every awkward MAGA hand gesture is a secret S.S. salute, and the Republican Party has been taken over by Nazis.

Never Trumpers gleefully promoted this narrative, layering it with a bipartisan façade. (Karl Rove repeated it again last week.) But it’s a lie.

“Literally Hitler” has a Jewish daughter, Jewish grandkids, an immigrant wife, and a veep who’s married to a Hindu Indian. “Literally Hitler” is wildly popular in Israel. “Literally Hitler’s” most loyal ethnic bloc isn’t white people or Aryans — it’s Native Americans.

And while the media was obsessively comparing Trump to Hitler, the Democratic Party was captured by Israel-obsessed, pro-Palestine socialists, i.e., the DSA.

DSA stormtroopers insist they’re not antisemites. They claim their criticisms are limited to Israel’s political policies; their only motivation is to ease the suffering of the poor, neglected Palestinian civilians.

Israel’s status as a Jewish state, you see, is entirely coincidental.

Yet it’s awfully revealing how many of the DSA’s enemies were also the REAL Hitler’s enemies. There’s an absurd degree of overlap: The DSA hates Israel, despises AIPAC, and vows to eliminate “Jewish influence” and/or “the globalists” (wink, wink). The Nazis and DSA both oppose free market capitalism, condemn “profiteering” business owners, support the government takeover of private industries — plus a dramatic expansion of mandatory, government-controlled social programs.

Every accusation is a confession.

Speaking of which, two polls just dropped. They’re not receiving much mainstream news coverage, mostly because the media loathes the results. The first poll undermines 4,131 days of a “literally Hitler” PR campaign. It’s the final solution to the mashugana Trump-is-Hitler narrative.

Turns out that the National Socialists and Democratic Socialists share more than just a name.

The second poll is even worse: It imperils the media’s demoralization campaign for the 2026 midterms. For months and months, the talking heads have been trying to convince you that a Blue Wave is inevitable — and the MAGA coalition is kaput.

Iran and Epstein have killed it. MAGA is finished.

Yet it seems a key demo is returning home: young voters. Trump’s numbers have suddenly spiked.

Let’s begin with “literally Hitler”:

It’s from a YouGov survey on the popularity of world leaders, both living and dead. What’s fascinating is that Republican and independent results were 100% identical: Just 1% of each had a “very favorable” opinion of Hitler, 4% had a “somewhat unfavorable” opinion, 6% had a “somewhat unfavorable opinion,” 79% had a “very unfavorable opinion,” and 10% “don’t know.”

On absolutely every question about Hitler, Republicans and independents were indistinguishable.

This means that if Republicans are Nazis, then so are independents. (Go ahead, Democrats: Go bash independents as Nazis. I double dog dare ya!)

Because we’re not Nazis, of course. Just 5% of us think the Führer was fab.

Yet TWICE as many Democrats are fans of Hitler!

Too bad YouGov didn’t ask Democratic respondents if they also supported the DSA: I’ll betcha a Diet Coke there’d be a big-arse correlation between the DSA boosters and the Hitler fanboys. (“The enemy of my enemy” and all that.)

It’s gotten so bad, MORE than twice as many Democrats now approve of Hitler as approve of Trump!

The media can scream in every beer hall that Trump is “literally Hitler” and MAGA voters are all Nazis, but the evidence is overwhelming: The Democratic Party is the most pro-Hitler major political party in America today.

And Democrats are twice as likely to SUPPORT Hitler as the people they’re accusing of BEING Hitler!

On to the second poll:

Newsweek: Donald Trump’s Approval Rating Quietly Shifts With Youngest Voters

This headline is a splendid example of media bias: More people read the headline than see the article, which is why pro-Trump polling news tends to be headlined via vague-sounding “shifts” — who knows what really happened? — whereas anti-Trump polling news leads with the stats. Example A is this morning’s gem from USA Today.

(It’s also adorable that Newsweek described it as a “quiet shift.” Yeah, when the rest of the media ignores a story, it sounds pretty dang quiet, doesn’t it?)

It’s a deliberate PR strategy. Polling results consistently have a pro-Democrat bias anyway, so when you blast the anti-Trump stats in the headline and bury the rest, it heightens the illusion of overwhelming Democratic support. Conservative voters are thus demotivated.

Everyone hates Trump! Why, the Blue Tsunami will swallow the world! There’s no point in even voting, ‘cause we’re getting killed.

But beyond the headline, here’s what Newsweek reported:

President Donald Trump’s approval among voters aged 18 to 24 rose from 25 percent in July to 41 percent in September, according to a Newsweek analysis of Harvard/Harris polling.

The shift challenges the idea that young Americans who backed the president in 2024 are uniformly moving away from him before the midterm elections.

It’s an eye-popping statistic: Over the past two months, Trump’s support has jumped by 64%!

Young voters are most vulnerable to changes in the job market, good or bad. Affordability woes hit Zoomers disproportionately to Boomers. They surf the crest of cultural changes; they’re early adopters of political shifts.

And they’re now racing away from the Democratic Party.

This suggests that the 2026 midterms are anything but decided. Just because voters haven’t been shy about expressing their dissatisfaction with Republicans doesn’t mean they prefer the Democrats.

The opposite could be true: Yes, they’re disappointed in President Trump’s progress and expected better/faster results — but he’s still a WAY better option than those DSA weirdos!

As we near Election Day, more Americans will likely feel the same way. Because everything tightens in the homestretch. Wayward demos return home.

That’s been the historic norm: One domino falls, then the other.

It begins with young voters, but that’s not where it ends.

So stay engaged. The midterms aren’t close to over. The media wants to demoralize you, but there are plenty of reasons for optimism.

A 64% jump in youth support is extraordinary! (Especially for a Republican.)

Just know you won’t be reading the good news in a headline, because that’s not how the propaganda game is played. Instead, the media relies on dog whistles, bias, and selective reporting — while tarring Republicans for the crimes of Democrats.

I’m not cheating! YOU must be cheating! I’m not Hitler! YOU must be Hitler!

But every accusation is a confession.

The Democrats and the media aren’t just pointing fingers. They’re holding up a mirror.

This is why they keep seeing Hitler.

One Last Thing: 2026 will reach a crescendo with the midterm elections. Nothing less than the future of our country teeters in the balance.

Never before have the political battle lines been so clearly defined. Blue wave or red wall, the 2026 midterms will transform our country.

We need your help to win the information war!

As a PJ Media VIP member, you’ll receive exclusive access to our behind-the-paywall content, commenting privileges, and an ad-free experience. VIP Gold gets you the same level of “insider access” across our entire family of sites (PJ Media, Townhall, RedState, twitchy, Hot Air, and Bearing Arms). That means: More stories, more videos, more content, more fun, more conservatism, more EVERYTHING!

And if you CLICK HERE and use the promo code FIGHT you’ll receive a Trumpian 60% discount!

Thank you for your consideration.

 

Poll: 1 in 4 Trump voters say GOP candidates should break from the president– www.politico.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

One in four Trump voters say GOP candidates should break with the president to win in November, according to the latest POLITICO Poll, conducted by independent firm PF Global.

The findings underscore the degree to which even loyal Republicans understand President Donald Trump is a drag on the ticket. Persistent inflation, $4 gas prices, 7% mortgage rates, a quagmire in the Middle East and a trade war with Canada have given Republican candidates no shortage of opportunities to take the president to task.

Michigan’s GOP Senate candidate Mike Rogers this week became the latest example when he called for an end to the “tariff war” with Canada — a notable shift after he spent weeks defending the president’s decision.

“It was brilliant by Mike Rogers … when you talk about the affordability issue, in every poll I get back, every week, more and more people have this as their top issue,” said Michigan-based GOP consultant Jason Roe, who is working on Rep. Tom Barrett’s (R-Mich.) reelection campaign. “Obviously the price of gas is a result of the Iran war, and in Michigan, more than anything else, the trade war with Canada.”

Rogers is hardly the only example. Florida GOP Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar used an ad filmed in front of the White House to call out the president’s immigration crackdown. Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-Iowa), in her bid to win the Iowa Senate seat,has called for an end to the Iran war amid souring diesel costs. Ken Paxton, the GOP’s embattled Texas Senate nominee, has now been the subject of four leaks exposing his private attempts to distance himself from Trump and the national party.

“It’s just all dictated by the data,” said a GOP strategist working on a Senate campaign, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the president. “They see the writing on the wall about the gas prices and the inflation. Running as a Trump sycophant is not going to work in 2026. It’s the only political move you can do in Michigan, a state like that. It’s toxic to be tied to the man.”

There are some limits: No Republican has completely broken with Trump, and several are eager to stand next to him on stage or in the Oval. Few dare to criticize him directly. And many still lean on their ties to the president on the campaign trail and in their social media profiles as they seek to rally the MAGA base.

A White House official, granted anonymity to discuss internal thinking, scoffed at the idea that Rogers’ — or any other candidates’ — efforts to distance themselves from Trump administration policies, amounted to a major break with the president.

“If I’m a candidate that’s physically trying to push away from the president, I’m not attending this stuff. I’m just gonna back away all the way,” the official said. “Being in the midst of a campaign and needing to talk to the issues that are being discussed as kitchen table topics, you just kind of have to.”

White House spokesperson Davis Ingle pointed to the Trump administration’s efforts to lower prescription drug costs, cut taxes, secure the border and grow job numbers: “No one can dispute the fact that President Trump has created one of the most robust coalitions in political history with the MAGA movement, and the president understands how to communicate with them. President Trump is the unequivocal leader, best messenger, and unmatched motivator for the Republican Party, and he is committed to maintaining Republican majorities in Congress.”

Politicians touting their independence from Washington is nothing new. But as the poll reveals, it’s notable

that so many who voted for Trump, who has been the GOP’s dominant force for a decade, are ready for candidates to take that leap.

Much of the fracture is driven by the non-MAGA wing of his coalition, the people who voted for Trump in 2024 but do not identify as part of his most loyal base, the survey found. When asked about specific issues such as the economy, trade and tariffs, data centers, immigration and the Iran war, non-MAGA Trump voters were roughly twice as likely as MAGA Trump voters to say their GOP candidate should break from the president.

But Trump still retains an intense hold over the base. More than two-thirds of MAGA voters said GOP candidates should continue to align with Trump across all of those issues.

That creates a no-win situation for many Republican candidates: Tie yourself to Trump and his policies too tightly and you lose independents and non-MAGA Republicans. Break too far, and you risk leaving MAGA disenchanted.

Candidates trying to thread that needle are quick to praise the president but blame his advisers, as Salazar did, or avoid mentioning Trump by name at all.

Roe said each candidate has to measure the “downstream effects” of a decision to distance themselves from the president, adding that it’s a balance between “alienating your base with appealing to voters that are looking for some independence.”

On the campaign trail, many Republicans acknowledge that the president remains an asset in shoring up base voters crucial to November. It’s part of the reason Trump has aggressively traveled to red states — including Alabama, Alaska, Iowa, Nebraska, Ohio and Texas — bastions of conservatism that need his star power to coax die-hard supporters to the polls. The White House official pointed to the president’s rally with South Carolina Senate candidate Darline Graham ahead of her run-off as an example of Trump’s ability to juice turnout.

RNC press secretary Natalie Baldassarre insisted that Republicans “remain united behind the president’s agenda” and are “laser focused on winning.”

“Our candidates will run the races necessary to best represent their districts and prevent Democrats from taking control,” she said.

The president is telling voters to “pretend” he is on the ballot, and he has insisted the party is already in a better place as he blitzes states across the country, touting his economy and arguing that higher prices are a small price to pay for national security amid the lingering war with Iran.

But some candidates are still nervous that if they campaign beside the president, they could alienate undecided voters. Some Republicans have encouraged Trump’s team not to send the president to a blue-leaning Omaha district and other key districts where his approval rating is underwater ahead of Election Day.

“I don’t think there are that many candidates who are clamoring for Trump to come to their state. But to the extent they do, it’s a gamble that they’ve already lost the voters who are gonna vote against them, and they need to light a fire under the voters who are sitting it out, and he’s the torch,” said Democratic strategist David Axelrod, who was chief strategist for Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign. “The problem is the torch can burn the whole house down.”

The damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don’t dilemma is perhaps best captured with Paxton’s campaign in Texas. On Wednesday, Trump took the stage in San Antonio, bringing up Paxton, the same day his latest closed-door comments complaining about the Iran war and high prices dragging down his campaign went public.

But standing on stage with Trump, he struck a much different tune.

“Wow, what is it like to be up on stage with the president of the United States? Pretty amazing,” he said. “Mr. President, I want to thank you for coming for me, for coming for us and for coming for Texas.”

 

Abdul El-Sayed Wins Michigan Senate Debate Because Mike Rogers Can’t Shake Trump– www.politicususa.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The debate between the candidates for Michigan’s open US Senate seat was ugly. Mike Rogers can’t run a successful Senate campaign by cozying up to Donald Trump and running on the issues. Instead, Rogers has to make the debate about Abdul El-Sayed.

PoliticusUSA is 100% independent news and opinion. We are not influenced by any political party or corporation. Support us by becoming a subscriber.

In contrast, El-Sayed spent the debate that was loaded with personal attacks linking Rogers to Trump and the president’s unpopular policies.

The debate exchange of the night came when El-Sayed said:

 He wanted to make this about him or me, but the question is about you. Can you afford your gas? Can you afford your groceries? Under this guy who’s gonna rubber-stamp everything Donald Trump tells him to rubber-stamp, you’re gonna continue to pay way more out of your nose because he works for corporations and Donald Trump.

 

Some people might suggest that this was not the kind of debate that would help voters make a decision, but the opposite was true.

The debate was deeply insightful, just not in the way that Mike Rogers intended.

Rogers wants to have it both ways. He wants to “other” El-Sayed while distancing himself from Trump.

 

Michigan Senate hopeful Mike Rogers faces pressure over Trump’s trade war– www.cbc.ca
News Source
EXCERPT:

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

Michigan Senate candidate Mike Rogers faced pressure over U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade war with Canada during a heated debate Thursday that could sway voters in a consequential midterm race in which neither candidate ruled out future tariffs.

Trump’s escalating tariffs on Canada came up within the first 10 minutes of the debate. Rogers was asked about an advertisement released Wednesday in which he said “Canada is not our enemy,” and how he squares that position with longstanding support for the tariffs.

“I would like to see the deal made,” Rogers responded. “I have actually called the White House this week, talked to the secretary of Commerce, about getting the deal done.”

Rogers said Canada imposes tariffs on U.S. goods, without providing details about the levies or addressing the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement, which was negotiated during the first Trump administration.

But the Republican candidate said the U.S. tariffs on Canada are now too high and those should be eliminated.

“This is about getting to the best deal possible. I’d like to it end. I think we need to end it,” Rogers said before taking jabs at his Democratic opponent, Abdul El-Sayed, claiming El-Sayed’s policies would raise prices.

MIA Promotion for Issues 26 10 09

In this issue:

MIA Quarterly 26 10 09 FINAL DRAFT July-Sept 2026 alt

Pricing Liberty – The Great Bidening – China’s Iran

In Issue 2026.34, Naked Wolf, we cover Concealing Progress, Exposing Biden, and Facing AI

This is our quarterly report for the 3rd Quarter of 2026

Our Situation Report summarizes and analyzes the top bellwethers in U.S. Politics, Geopolitics, Culture, Sci-Tech, Market and Market News. In this issue, we document the willing unveiling of the progressives and the world’s continued efforts to come to grips with and understand the new AI reality of power.

Our Bellwether Digest keeps you up to date on bellwether stories of the past week.

Our Bellwether Quarterly presents the most relevant bellwethers during Q3 2026 in U.S. Politics, Geopolitics, Culture, Market, and Sci-Tech News.

In our Final Thought, Publisher Bill Collier analyzes Vice President’s response to Islamism.

We are delaying the release of our Transitions Report to November 20, 2026

  1. Q3 2026 Sitrep – Summaries – Progressive State – U.S. Politics
  2. Bellwether Digest – Global Outlook, Headlines Missed, People Advance

III. Q3 2026 Sitrep – Summaries – Geopolitics – Culture- Sci-Tech

  1. Bellwether Quarterly – Global Outlook, Headlines Missed, People Advance
  2. Q3 2026 Sitrep – Analysis – Market – Agit Prop – Assessment – Recommended Action – Predictive Analysis
  3. Final Thought – JD Vance’s Approach to Political Islam is Naïve

Each Issue contains links to the 2025 archive on the last page where you can click, access, download, and print.

The 2026 Archive can also be found on this last page.

We trust you will find this Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor highly valuable.

In Your Corner,

The Executive Team

2026 Elections,

Iran War,

AI Watch,

Progressive State,

Ukraine War,

Judgefare,

Trump Deportations,

Abortion Watch,

Transgender Ideology,

China Watch,

 

 

 

By STAFF

Dates: July 1 – Sept. 30, 2026

INTRODUCTION

This Sitrep identifies two growing threats to Americanism, Progressivism and Islam. It is an underlying theme almost everywhere, because “politics” now touches nearly every part of every Americans’ lives, never mind how much it touches the daily lives of others worldwide.

We do not mince words when we describe these groups and their ideological beliefs, especially when it comes to the progressives. We use them because they use them, and now they’re saying these things out loud with increasing boldness.

“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, so that you may be sons of your Father who is in heaven. For he makes his sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. For if you love those who love you, what reward do you have? Do not even the tax collectors do the same?” – Matthew 5:43-46

While we support American civic authority taking criminal action against the progressive state, we also support forgiveness and opportunities for restoration for the vast majority of progressives, and even Islamists, willing to conform to American Rule of Law.

NO MATTER their justification, they must commit to not use violence, corporate or state, as a means of influence to deter wrongthink in the public square.

Those who commit to allowing their beliefs and the institutions, the power, to die through consensually made decisions by their neighbors can exist in the American republic to come. It is only to the most egregious offenders, even among public school teachers who taught white shame to children, that we would recommend criminal action, and only by civic authority, not self-declared ones.

Our faith binds us, we believe, to recognize civic authority as the bellwether of God’s judgment on a land. Outside of the state sending squads to murder us all, we do not “touch God’s anointed,” so we in no way, shape, or form, advocate violence as a means of deterring progressive state authority outside of the support of duly elected American civic authority. Where no American civic authority stands, we will continue our work to be as self-sustaining as possible. Our Hope Estate project will continue.

We believe it is important to speak plainly when you perceive dangerous power is about to ascend. This is the category that we put both Islamism and Progressivism, but from these groups future Americans await to be truly woken. There are “Pauls” among them still.

As Elihu said to Job before he offered harsh words to him, “Answer me, if you can; set your words in order before me; take your stand. Behold, I am toward God as you are; I too was pinched off from a piece of clay. Behold, no fear of me need terrify you; my pressure will not be heavy upon you.” – Job 33:5-7

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Our Situation Reports are an attempt to summarize and analyze the most essential bellwethers of a covered period from a Christian Americanist perspective.

We summarize our Bellwether of the Quarter. We have selected three bellwether trends in U.S. Politics, Geopolitics and Culture. In Sci-Tech, this quarter we are concentrating on AI and social media.

We analyze the market according to the major economic indicators (such as the jobs report) over the course of the three-month period (July-September 2026).

Next is our Agit Prop section, which features 2 bellwether examples of Progressive State Agit Prop in the media from each month this quarter.

We conclude the report with an Assessment, a Recommended Action, and a Predictive Analysis.

Read the full research notes we used to compile this Situation Report.

A. TOP BELLWETHER OF THE QUARTER: THE PROGRESSIVE STATE

As we have outlined in past issues of MIA, the progressive state is seeking to throw off the shackles of the vestiges of their parasitical victim, the American republic. This past quarter we have seen the progressive state more overtly PUBLICLY declaring itself.

It’s done this through its cultural leaders, its politicians in power, its candidates hoping to make the break official, and the de facto state press (the MSM press) which continues, in our view, to violate both insurrectionist laws and campaign advertising laws.

Some states have become more openly progressive wherever the Democratic Party has full control. States such as California, New York, and now Virginia, are just a few of these states now attempting to openly follow progressive rule of law over American rule of law.

Our Bellwether of the Quarter was chosen because of the acceleration of the emergence of the state within the republic this past quarter. As far as openly expressing progressive rule of law standards over American rule of law standards, at the highest levels of government (including and especially the judiciary), this past quarter has exceeded all other past quarters.

The progressive state is ready to become its own story, divorced entirely from the “white supremacist story” they tell about our republic.

We look at four aspects of the progressive state emerging, the spirit of what this new state will be, the power demonstrated wherever the progressive state has the capacity to use government force, the key candidates representing the progressive rule of law nakedly, and how the state media continues to act with minimal consequence in violation of American rule of law.

We use the news tag “Progressive State” on stories involving corporate or government authority led by and represented by progressive ideologues and activists.

  1. THE SPIRIT – If the party of James Talarico consolidates power and forms the progressive state, they will assume their citizens are children who need to be treated like they’re “big kindergartners,” as Covid-19 showed us in spades.

Hasan Piker is the biggest progressive state influencer online today, and he uses his platform to say the quiet parts out loud. He even shouts them. Recently, he told Americans, “I will throw you in prison. I want Chinese-style communism to happen inside of the Democratic Party right now. I want to do cultural revolution sh*t.”

A recent poll revealed a majority of Democrats, most likely, support killing Trump to end his Presidency. The “most likely” part is the fact that 25% of the Democrats polled said they had no opinion, while 31% said they at least somewhat support killing Trump to end his Presidency.

The Democrat Socialists of America are not the fringe of the Democratic Party, they are now the majority, with  more than 59% of Democrats supporting the DSA now.

The DSA’s stated goal is to destroy the American Empire, the republic, from within. The top villain in the DSA is the white devil and his white power vehicle, the American Empire.

For the sake of protecting the non-white from the white devil, college students support much stricter penalties for whites than non-whites when it comes to “hate speech” codes. “Hate speech” codes are progressive rule of law standards, not American ones. No doubt progressive schools and teachers trained these American citizens to reject free speech in favor of progressive-controlled speech.

Progressive Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut confessed on a recent podcast that Democrats in power will pass internet “hate speech” and “misinformation” regulations to assure America cannot back a “demagogue” like Donald J. Trump “ever again.”

  1. THE POWER – In July, Hawaii’s Supreme Court issued a ruling that declared the U.S. Supreme Court was invalid because of its white supremacist ruling reversing Roe V Wade. The reversal ended nationwide protection of the murdering of unborn children.

To the progressive state of Hawaii, defending the unborn from murder is a dog whistle of the white devil, and whatever empowers the white devil must be opposed by anyone not wanting to be called a white devil or a white devil supporter (lest they be un-personed or even murdered).

Anthropic AI is run by progressives who represent progressive, not American values. For them, there is no individual, only preferred social groups. They have made it clear where their standards lie when they recently assembled a panel of progressive radical anti-white, anti-heteronormative, anti-Christian, anti-American activists to determine the standards for AI for all of us (if they have their wish).

Where progressives have power, there are no other people but themselves allowed in, especially Americans.

In the progressive state city of Madison, Wisconsin, revolutionary insurgents took over a part of the city. They created a dependency zone called an autonomous zone to disguise how much they rely on Americans to get their daily sustenance, for the Americans that make their snack packs they stole from a white colonist are their sworn enemies.

The city responded by providing the insurgents with bathroom facilities.

Islamists are using progressive vehicles of power to break the American spirit in the land, counting on them to destroy Bill of Rights standards so they can come up from behind and take over once the Americans have fallen.

When Islamists have power, they vote to force Americans to pay reparations to Muslims for the “crime” of being mean to them after 9/11. This happened in the U.S. congress. The progressive state enables the Islamist state, though its center is not nearly as strong as the Islamists center is, and their warriors are not as committed to die as the Islamists are.

The Democrats have shown you what the progressive state offers, making it official DNC policy to support open borders and abolish ICE altogether, permanently. To them, the nation-state is a vehicle of power for the white man, who invented the nation-state. In truth, they support the nation-state still, they just support only one nation-state, a worldwide Empire destroying every nation-state but its own.

They are by far and away the most imperialistic, most nationalistic, most colonizing of all the ideologies with any real power in the world today, save one, Islamism, their “natural” frenemy until the Americans are destroyed. China’s project is the same as theirs, just with the Han race as the beacon of hope for the world, not the generic “poc race” or non-heteronormative people.

If you think our language is hyperbolic, we can assure you, this is the language the progressives use in classrooms every day, from elementary school to post-grad.

  1. PROGRESSIVE CANDIDATES – Texas Senate Progressive Candidate James Talarico was caught on camera confessing his full intentions to create legislation in keeping with progressive state rule of law standards, not American ones.

Not facing any real opposition, progressive congresswoman Rashida Tlaib recently declared “America was built on slavery, genocide, and oppression.” In other words, America is a white devil vehicle of power, therefore, it is not legitimate, it is evil, worthy of violent revolt.

She told her audience, “The political structures that we are surrounded by were built on slavery and genocide and oppression. Look at this room, motherf*kers. We aren’t going anywhere. Now we’re in Congress and every corner of the United States.”

They are not Americans, and she makes that clear: they are progressives, naked and free from the bondages of the corpse they emerged from, the American republic.

Progressive Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed couldn’t even condemn the Islamic Revolutionary Guard. He has been calling himself a capitalist as of late, but nothing in his history suggests he is anything but a radical anti-American Islamist, more than willing to borrow the “white devil” narrative from his progressive frenemies to raise street fighters of his own.

A North Carolina Progressive candidate for the state legislature has openly declared her support and intention to put Trump supporters in concentration camps. Shelly Headen’s campaign slogan is “Running to Restore Human Decency.” You must understand that, to Shelly, non-progressives aren’t human at all.

  1. STATE MEDIA – The MSM press are revolutionary activists consciously seeking to dismantle the American Empire, the republic, from within.

Here are some key examples of the progressive state media’s efforts this past quarter to use agit prop to spread violence and hate against the American people and their republic, from the blogs to the corporate press:

Daily Kos proudly declares America prefers socialists over MAGA, intending that as an own, but so removed from American standards that it is only telling on itself to Americans. It’s saying the quiet part out loud, the “left” is not part of the American project, which rejects state and corporate control of social orthodoxy through violence.

CNN had a townhall with Hasan Piker. Rather than give him a mixed audience who might ask him pointed, direct questions, they filled the audience with progressives and essentially ran an infomercial intending to normalize Hasan and progressive rule of law values in general.

The progressive state project is an international one. While each progressive cell operates within the nation-state it is within, the hope is that the nation-states which fall to the progressives will then become one global progressive state.

The Guardian militantly supports the American progressive state, though it serves the progressive state that has effectively taken over the UK today. A recent headline from the UK branch of the progressive state press connected Trump’s recognition of the “communist menace” from within to “tropes.” In progressive dog whistling, trope is always connected to white supremacist racism.

The message is a dog whistle to progressive street fighters to keep using violence to overthrow the republic. It is also an attempt to shame anyone daring to publicly identify the actual communists now openly running for (and winning) political power in America today.

When President Trump gave his Election Fraud speech, CBS gave it brief coverage, ABC and NBC refused to cover it at all. Every single network mentioned, along with every major progressive state player, has been pushing the lie that there is no fraud in elections, and mass mailer elections are the safest form of voting.

They add to that the message, sometimes through implication, sometimes directly, that only evil people like “right wingers” and “fascists” believe such “lies.”

The President’s speech may not have delivered a “smoking gun” to those who don’t want to see the reality of the lack of integrity of mass mailer voting and digital voting, but to those who understand the inherent lack of integrity in both systems, there was plenty there for an American press to investigate and expose.

They chose to deny and demonize the opinion that mass mailer and digital voting are inherently anti-integrity based, and intentionally so.

  1. SUMMARY – This quarter, those who do not see the progressive state before our very eyes are already its citizens. What remains to be seen is how many Americans are left, how many of those with one foot in the progressive value system and one foot in the American one will pull out and return fully to the American republic. Lastly, we have yet to discover how many true progressive state citizens there actually are.

Link to References

B. U.S. POLITICS

In U.S. Politics, we chose the 2026 Elections, Judgefare, and Trump Deportations as our Bellwether Trends. Be sure to read our October 30, 2026, issue of MIA, where we will provide a special thorough look at the midterm elections.

The 2026 midterm elections are just about here, and that trend has dominated nearly every month this quarter. The increased boldness of progressive judges’ rulings is making the division between American and Progressive Rule of Law more and more apparent.

The progressives haven’t given up their hope of ending white dominance and American standards in these lands. Their lawyers, DAs, and judges are ratcheting up their efforts to slow down the deportations of their hoped-for future progressive state citizens, a people conditioned to rely more on the state than themselves for their definitions of happiness.

What the progressive fails to understand is white dominance means nothing to Americans, what matters is rule of law, which should be color-blind. We Americans are united by our commitment to recognize the inherent right of our peaceful neighbors to pursue their own happiness without government or corporate intrusion.

We would rather live in a non-white dominated land that adheres to American rule of law than a white-dominated land which doesn’t.

Black Americans are better neighbors than White Progressives. The “American” part makes anyone, regardless of race, a good neighbor.

The “Progressive” part makes anyone, regardless of race, a dangerous neighbor. The progressive threatens your very self-agency with a moral imperative to use violence against you (called Direct Action) if you fail to comply to their orthodoxy. This is not hyperbole; this is the spirit of the average citizen of the progressive state.

  1. 2026 ELECTIONS – As we go into the midterms this first week of November, President Donald Trump is finding himself reaching rock bottom (so far) in the opinion polls. On the generic ballot, the Democrats lead the Republicans by double digits.

Going into the election, the Democrats are normalizing the rise of the Socialists in their party, with Gavin Newsom inadvertently confessing the party’s platform would be changed to come closer to the DSA’s.

In the House, the Democrats must win 57 out of the 77 competitive races in order to win a majority.

The primaries witnessed the rise of the Democratic Socialists and Islamists within the Democratic Party, a party that is now openly embracing “socialism.”

SCOTUS officially made this a mass mailer election wherever Progressives rule. This followed the earlier ruling that allowed mass mailer ballots to be counted AFTER the election. This means those slow-drip elections that make manufacturing votes so easy are sure to continue, now “constitutionally” (at least in the progressive state, not in the American republic).

On the gerrymandering front, SCOTUS would deliver a U.S. House Progressive state hold when it effectively ruled the general election would be conducted by Missouri’s 2022 district map, even though the primaries were held with the 2025 district map. Their ruling assumed timeliness trumped basic election security and integrity.

AI governance and Data Centers have become the central driver in a number of races. We wrote about how these issues are drowning out the existential rule of law standards at stake in the midterm elections.

While the Democrats use the AI devil as a tool to distract from the radical shift in governance their party now represents, they also use government power to assure no effective safeguards at the national level takes place. They recently nixed a bill-by-consent that would have put a check on AI data center power by empowering state regulators to apply more rigorous energy demand standards.

The tactics of the Progressives are now obvious, to pretend to be moderate Democrats as opposed to what they actually are, anti-capitalist, anti-white, anti-Christian, and anti-American.

They hope to use the sheep in wolves clothing tactic, coupled with the demagoguery of the AI devil, to win rural voters over.

  1. JUDGEFARE – The list of rulings against President Trump exploded this quarter. It started with a ruling by an Obama judge that not only cancelled an IRS settlement with President Trump, it also started a process of barfare against DOJ attorneys. From preventing efforts to check voter rolls and ending mass mailer ballot elections, all levels of the Federal judiciary have been busy striking down Trump policies.

Ending DEI is somehow a constitutional problem for progressive judges. The rulings are almost always “procedural” or opinion based, such as assuming the judge knows better than the President what constitutes a security issue or deciding their preferred group’s special privilege trumps American security, and even sovereignty.

Perhaps the most egregious ruling came when SCOTUS somehow found a way to make it easy for America’s enemies to conquer her by having babies on her soil. Samuel Alito, an American justice, wrote in dissent of the ruling, “American citizenship, the court says, was based on a medieval English ‘feudal’ principle, according to which each person ‘owed personal service to the lord of the soil’ as his ‘master’—a perpetual servitude that was ‘born with the child and only ended in the grave.’”

In other words, the Roberts majority had to pretend American rule of law was based on the divine right of kings, not the Declaration of Independence, that we have no King for We are the government. As Alito noted, this ruling came just a couple days before the 250th anniversary of a republic born in resistance to the divine right of Kings.

It should be noted that Britian itself departed the divine right of Kings standard with the ascension of William and Mary, who ruled as protectors of a state church, whose voluntary membership served as the real justification for state rule, the approval of the people. Roberts skipped history class the day they taught about the Glorious Revolution.

We wrote about this in Part 4 of our Transitions series, England’s Death of the Divine Right of Kings.

Shortly after this ruling. A Texas Hospital was caught selling American birthright citizenship plans to foreigners, with CCP members ready to buy.

Progressives have all-but completely taken over most of the major judiciary institutions, from law schools to bar associations. They organize behind closed doors to affect lawfare strategies to target people which, in their eyes, are criminals by their very being, white supremacists and their white supremacist allies.

At this point, we are thoroughly convinced they truly believe the white devil lie, and to them, everyone not speaking progressive is dog whistling white supremacism. This is not hyperbole. This is observed reality.

This is why it is so easy for judges and prosecutors alike to knowingly violate American rule of law. It is justified because they are protecting the people from something even worse than Hitler, the American.

Jack Smith’s work might very well be the pattern seen from local to federal levels, wherever progressive prosecutors reign. The tactics are easy to duplicate when the judges are in on the game, which was a problem for Smith, who ran across an American judge.

American Senator Chuck Grassley accused the progressives of nearly destroying our republic, claiming, “The previous Democrat administrations under Obama and Biden conducted secret, insidious and downright evil operations that almost took down our government. That’s arguably worse than Watergate.”

The progressive effort to murder the republic continues.

  1. TRUMP DEPORTATIONS – On one hand, the GOP is pushing to codify President Trump’s deportation efforts, but on the other, an increasing number of Republicans in toss-up districts are calling on “moderation” in deportation.

They do so as it becomes increasingly clear the Biden imports were targeted to disrupt white rural and suburban communities. Wherever white majorities exist, there is a problem that only people from cultures and nations that oppose our American way of life can solve.

That last part is the most essential part, for where there are non-whites who embrace Americanism, there is no compassion to make them American citizens. There is no great hue and cry from the progressives to welcome Nigerian Christians, who are being murdered by Islamists, because these non-whites would be predisposed to favor Americanism over Progressivism.

We would prefer these “immigrants” over the white progressives born here.

The white devil is the justification to murder their true targets, the Christian church and the American republic.

Those rescuers of white majority-ism, Biden’s imports (as we are calling this massive influx of illegal aliens under Biden) triggered national housing costs to rise by more than 30%.

Representative Brandon Gill flat-out accused the Democrats of using Biden’s imports as a “path to political power,” and they were (and still hope to), through making them permanent progressive state voters.

SCOTUS helped Trump with a ruling that allows the President to deport Biden’s imports to third countries, but the progressive district justices, mostly Biden committee-appointed judges, have been consistently striking down every effort to remove illegal aliens from American lands.

Progressive lawyers and prosecutors are also willing to bend every American rule of law standard in preference to the rescuers from white majority-ism, including letting out convicted child rapists.

To the progressive, being unapologetically white is worse than murdering and raping children, especially white children.

Every time there is an incident involving an ICE officer harming a protestor or illegal alien, professional progressive street fighters march in to physically intimidate any and all, wherever and whenever they can. Wherever the law allows it, violence is executed, in the form of direct assaults on ICE agents, destroying property, or assaulting Americans who dare stand up to them.

Where progressives have state power, every effort is made to hamper, impede, and harm ICE agents by any means which their progressive judges will brazenly allow.

Link to References

C. GEOPOLITICS

Our three geopolitical bellwethers are obvious ones, China, Iran, and the UK. With China, the U.S. is currently engaged in a geopolitical struggle both to secure cheap and effective AI resources and prevent the other from doing the same. At home, China is fully engaged in helping the progressive state activists create instability and slow down American AI development.

Iran is the major battle in the geopolitical AI war, with this quarter seeing the regime bolstered mostly by progressive state agit prop. While the U.S. has failed to finish off the regime, its hold on power is becoming increasingly tenuous as economic collapse only accelerates from within.

The UK continues its slide into oblivion as its identity dissolves into the progressive state led by its unelected Prime Minister, Andy Burnham. It serves as a bellwether for what it’s like to live under progressive state rule. It might also serve as a bellwether for what might be done to topple that state, should the British natives successfully offer a counter-revolutionary response to their colonization by the progressive state.

On our radar is an emerging trade conflict in the Caspian Sea, with all the major powers coming to a potential head over trade route access. The AI Wars are making secured trade routes vital, but that’s not enough. The AI Wars are also making it vital for you to make your competition’s trade routes as un-secured as possible.

We are also watching Islamist and progressive violence spreading across European nations like France and Spain. Expect a Deep Dive soon on the state of Progressive Islamist Europe.

  1. CHINA WATCH – China appears to be preparing its citizens for a war footing, which might be borne from a genuine concern or a posture for Xi to secure patriotic support.

While Xi continues to conduct government purges from within, his influencers abroad are beating American ones. No doubt the assistance of the progressive state press helps his cause. His frenemy partners in America have helped as much as anyone else at driving world opinion towards China.

China has disrupted American government cyber security and inserted sensitive parts into U.S. voting machines (we presume with progressive compliance). American Progressive state universities have allowed China to set up propaganda centers in their universities.

China’s youth want the false assurance of Maoist control, a spirit cultivated by Chairman Xi’s agit prop in the schools. This happened as China officially became an ethnic nationalist state, the very type of state progressives ALLEGEDLY fear the most.

The meeting at the White House between Chairman Xi and Trump seemed on the surface to yield more for Xi than for Trump. Rumors of Xi’s shaking or failing health only increased during this visit. Allegedly, the President offered to sell China weapons, though that allegation has yet to be confirmed.

China is going all-in on AI, even as its top spy chief warns AI could topple the party. Xi is attempting to create a coalition of AI nations in opposition to the U.S. At this point, nations are sizing up their place in potential coalition pecking orders and their advantage or disadvantage in selecting one of the three emerging centers of AI power, America, China, and the EU.

As China moves closer to Canada, Canadians move closer to China, making Canada a security threat the closer they gravitate towards a Chinese alignment.

China is winning influence in countries like Germany and the UK, even as evidence of its violations of trust continue to emerge in both countries.

  1. IRAN WAR – By the end of the third quarter of this year, it has become apparent that militarily Iran is not viable. It has also become apparent the progressive state press continues to support narratives that undermine confidence in the war with the American people. Support for the war has never been lower.

President Trump’s fiery UN speech was met with scorn by the “American” press, who reveled when the Iranian officials walked out mid-speech. He made it clear his intentions of ending the regime’s power for good.

After alleged Iranian agents were caught trying to bomb a UK air base with U.S. forces on it, Burnham’s government chose to let the men out on a bail that required no monetary deposit. Trump’s only public response to the decision was “I wouldn’t have done that.”

At the end of September, Iran proposed a seven-day truce to re-open the Strait of Hormuz, which was rejected, as traffic to and around the Strait has returned to pre-war levels.

Iran’s economy is shutting down, its oil rots in ports, unable to break the blockade, yet the progressive state press will tell you victory for Iran is near.

Here is how we reported the war in our July SitRep: “The war began the month in a ceasefire, exited it, entered it again, and is currently mostly out of it. The Iranian regime was able to hold a funeral, where they called on the American government to be assassinated, and an American progressive attending gleefully agreed.

“While the U.S. has failed to remove the regime from power, as a fighting force, the regime is essentially done. Even Iran’s latest attempt to fight back, a surprise missile attack, failed to make any impact whatsoever.

“The response to the surprise attack was twelve straight days of the most intense bombing of the war so far, as infrastructure was targeted, including bridges.

“Internally, there are signs of dissenting action, but the regime’s murderous response has prevented any meaningful resistance from forming.

“The Strait of Hormuz is still not secure, and now the Houthis are attempting to shut down the Red Sea. The hope is that shutting down two major shipping lanes, the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz, will cripple the global economy.”

What has changed since then are signs of internal dissent are much greater than they were before, the economy is truly collapsed, and the Strait is either secured or alternative routes have been successfully created.

The last month has seen minimal military engagements by the U.S., outside of mainly securing the Strait.

The refusal of the President to make this war clearly about AI geopolitical strategy has emboldened dissent at home, even among republicans, who helped pass another House resolution calling on the President to end the war in Iran.

While the Houthis have successfully opened up a new front in the war by attacking the Red Sea and taking coastal Red Sea territory, their effect on world trade has so far not materialized.

  1. UK WATCH – Here is what we wrote about the UK in our July SitRep: “The UK began the month with a defense wish list they realize they cannot fund. Like many other militaries, the UK is banking on AI integration, drone technology, and high technology in general to create the new military of the 21st century.

“Nigel Farage was hit by a political scandal when it came out he had received millions of pounds from a wealthy donor as a ‘gift.’  He did not receive the gift while in office, but efforts to charge him with a crime for not reporting what the gift was for have nonetheless commenced.

“Keir Starmer would spend his last days as Prime Minister, leaving office July 20, 2026. Andy Burnham has taken the helm, promising to right the ship Starmer crashed (or so the narrative goes) …

“While Labour has recently taken the lead in the polls, the Burnham bump has not pushed the party up decisively. It appears to have given them a 4-point bump. The polls, however, still largely fail to prompt for Restore Britain as a party choice.

“Britian appears to be continuing to divide along nativist and colonist lines, with the progressives taking the side of the colonists they imported on the nativists’ dime.”

The slide between the preferred progressive UK classes, the “migrants,” has only dramatically accelerated. Protests, and even riots, attempting to disrupt the continued importing of “migrants” has led to more arrests, more videos of British police attacking the British people, including women.

A recent video showing a “British” store forcing men to be in one aisle and women in another to be Sharia compliant has only highlighted the existential divide between the imported people and the natives.

Reform appears done as it slides, at times, into third behind the conservatives, and Labor now continues to lead. Burnham, however, is not convinced it’s time to strike, so he is refusing to call for early elections, just yet. He is, however, floating the campaign narrative for the next election, hoping it will be about raising taxes to pay for more free social healthcare for its new “residents.”

In response to rising dissent, the progressive government is doubling down on efforts to censor, block, and arrest dissenters and their messages. Their efforts are so extreme, President Trump warned them they were close to violating Americans’ rights, including American social media companies.

Link to References

D. CULTURE

All year so far, abortion and euthanasia have been trending topics worldwide. Subcategories of “wokeness” continue to dominate culture headlines. In our wokeness category, we are limiting our analysis to the key bellwethers. Be sure to scan our notes from our culture section to read all the stories we didn’t cover here.

  1. WOKENESS – The rise of the DSA has brought with it another partner, Islamists. So far, Islamists within the progressive party have at least kept quiet about the rainbow ideology party of progressivism. They’ve embraced the white devil narrative, but not so much the rainbow narrative.

The rainbow narrative has these two essential beliefs: homonormativity trumps heteronormativity and social gender trumps the gender binary.

This belief is not justified by objective scientific studies, it is justified by the white devil narrative. In the progressive worldview, heteronormativity, the gender binary, and even monogamy, are all merely vehicles of power for white supremacists. Again, this is not hyperbole.

The Islamist is on board with the white devil narrative, especially because it also invalidates Christianity, which was allegedly invented by the white man to keep the black man down.

Where the Islamists break with the progressive is over the rainbow part of the DSA and the progressives. Now, those cracks are beginning to show.

Our medical institutions are still being controlled by woke activists, meaning the doctors they equip today will have gone through a gauntlet of white devil affirming rituals (ESPECIALLY if they happen to be white) before becoming your doctor.

This is why we recommend no American, regardless of race, accept the services of a doctor who graduated med school in the last five years, unless you have a personal reference that lets you know they don’t represent those anti-American, racist values.

Who wants to be medicated by a doctor who just agreed to hate you because of the color of your skin? Who wants to be medicated by a doctor willing to publicly pledge hatred of a people, even if you’re not the people they pledge to hate?

Recently, an American Medical student had her PhD research suspended because it invalidated medical “treatment” for children who “decided” they’re of a different gender than their sex. Celina Lazzari’s study has led her to oppose trans medical “treatment” of children. For this, our medical institutions will blacklist her from any high stations in their progressive-controlled institutions.

For her belief that medicine should not mutilate children for the sake of the trans ideology, our current medical institutions have now blacklisted her from excellent positions within their hierarchies of power.

These are NOT American institutions. These are not scientific institutions.

The voices that will get the research dollars and the influential chairs will be the ones that publicly affirm the white devil narrative and publicly support mutilating children to make them “look” like the opposite gender (which is also the sex).

A progressive U.S. representative, Jahana Hayes, not only defended DEI in schools, she said “Teaching colonialism directly addresses the systemic roots of healthcare inequities.”

Let us remember that progressivism’s end goal is to colonize the entire world with their ideology, by the end of the gun.

The gender binary is now heretical. The white man as a human being is blasphemous. These are not American institutions.

In our colleges and universities, the white devil standard bearer, DEI, is still being covertly practiced and enforced, though with less effectiveness than before. Also, in some instances DEI has been rendered mostly neutered.

Still, DEI as a way of life among the progressive citizens that run our American institutions, the revolutionary activists called professors, is still their lifeblood, their justification for daily violence against the American republic.

Progressive judges are doing their best to stop the removal of a blatantly racist, anti-heteronormative, pro-child-mutilating ideology mostly for procedural issues. The removal of overtly discriminatory standards that target whites, heterosexuals, men, and ‘cis-gendered’ people should not be an issue with the courts.

With American courts, they wouldn’t be, but with progressive courts, DEI is their real rule of law. They bend the constitution to DEI, not the other way around.

  1. ABORTION WATCH – As Christians and other Americans continue their fight against unborn child murder, the progressive state press is busy telling their audiences that pro-life groups are violent. The latest progressive state organ to do so is the Colorado Times Recorder. They ran a story with this headline, “Kansas Group Linked to Abortion Clinic Violence Protests in Colorado.”

If the progressive state press disappeared overnight, and an American one replaced them, the true horrifying reality of a child sacrifice industry would be exposed. Abortion mills would be exposed by investigative reporters with mainstream platforms, free from lawfare assault by progressive state prosecutors and judges.

Support for abortion would plummet overnight if America could see the real cost of “casual sex.”

We wrote in our August Sitrep, abortions are on the rise thanks to AI’s normalization of abortion and the ease with which women and girls can obtain the “abortion pill.”

The ease of acquiring the pill is leading to spikes in reported forced abortions by men attempting to either cover up their rapes or free themselves from financial liability. Abortionists are fighting against the “stigmatization” of the work they do, murdering unborn children.

One state, Massachusetts, legalized abortion up to birth while another state, Virginia, has a ballot initiative to do the same. There are now 10 states that have legalized abortion up to birth, and those states have fallen below population replacement levels, a goal of the progressive state.

Virginia’s ballot measure has been opposed by a coalition of Pastors, who wrote, “We believe these two amendments must be rejected for the Commonwealth of Virginia because they will harm our state as they are opposed to human flourishing and contrary to the Word of God. Let us seek one another’s true good and not mark our identity with the deprivations that these amendments would bring to the Constitution of Virginia.”

The story of a surrogate mother who fled from California to Texas to protect the baby inside her from the parents’ command to abort the child has become THE bellwether of the spirit of abortion in the land.

One woman risked life and limb and freedom to save a child while a progressive couple sought to use the state to force her to murder the life growing inside her.

California supported the would-be murderers, awarding the now-born child to the couple that wanted to murder him. They claimed it was a woman’s right to choose, until it wasn’t. The surrogate mother faced death threats from “pro-choice” militants.

California is also now forcing all public universities to advertise abortion services. None of them promote prenatal care and alternatives to abortions. This legislation does not require them to.

  1. EUTHANASIA WATCH – The normalization of euthanasia worldwide has only accelerated, though there have been some victories. In the UK, though it is controlled by progressives, still rejected yet another attempt to legalize euthanasia. In the Netherlands, euthanasia reached a new low, executing a child at the age of two. The doctors claim the execution was “handled well.”

This is the same country that allowed a 17-year-old rape victim to request euthanasia and be granted it. One of the last words she heard before the euthanasia “doctor” injected her with a lethal cocktail was from that same doctor. He said, “Girl, have a nice trip.”

In Colorado, efforts to assure standards are being met in their euthanasia program appear to be lacking, with no evidence of proper mental health evaluations happening with the “consenting” “patients.”

Also in Colorado, a man who euthanized his healthy mother also inherited her fortune. A progressive judge ruled that when he suffocated his mother to death with a plastic bag that he was only euthanizing her. He ordered the man to donate $25,000 to an organization that promotes “assisted suicide.”

In Canada, the execution of an 83-year-old woman by euthanasia doctors left the victim covered in blood and the family claiming the woman did NOT consent to being euthanized.

Canada’s euthanasia program almost killed a woman suffering from Stage 4 Breast Cancer. Her doctors strongly encouraged her to consider euthanasia. This led her to flee to America, where she was cured. A healthy woman suffering from depression was also recently euthanized by Canadian “doctors.”

Link to References

E. SCI-TECH

This quarter, sci-tech was dominated by AI, but Social Media, though it was a distant second, was still a dominant trend this quarter. AI in particular is developing many sub-topics that are becoming dominant trends in their own right, like AI Data Centers and AI Governance. In our 2026 election section, we highlighted AI’s role in this midterm election (which is significant).

Social media is going through a major shift in geopolitical realities that are putting its global reach in jeopardy. For both, this past quarter has been seminal in their development. For this reason, we are limiting our bellwether analysis in sci-tech to just two, AI and Social Media.

  1. AI WATCH – AI developments are only continuing to explode as institutions race to figure out how to exist in the new realities this tool is potentially creating. Here is a brief overview touching on some of the most essential developments of AI this quarter.

 It only touches the surface of what we have archived and covered this past quarter.

In our last issue, Paul Gordon Collier wrote about Agentic AI, “This technology is the backbone of all the other technologies to follow. Without Agentic AI (AAI), no military can hope to remotely compete with one that has such powers. For this reason alone, nation-states must assure they either have the most powerful, fastest-processing AI agents or be allied with a nation-state that does. This factor alone makes AI as essential to the 21st Century military as gunpowder has been to all militaries for the last six plus centuries.

“Currently, militaries are already using agentic AI, with the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine deploying it in major operations. Maven Smart System has been used by the U.S. military, which is a provider of intelligence gathering and targeting-supporting AI agents. That has been succeeded by Agent Network, which was just launched in June of this year.”

AI is far and away the “It Girl” of world power. So far, in America, the conversations about AI are borderline puerile, reducing the discourse to “AI will save us all” or “AI is the antichrist.”

As we live with nation-states who play geopolitical “games,” the luxury of halting AI production is not there for any nation-state hoping to be a world power in the decades to come.

AI is a powerful signal as well, able to create, enforce, and promote “ideal” narratives even if only through its ethical code, which will become the ethical code of anyone hoping to use these services.

The battle lines are being drawn around AI governance, and so far, in America, the progressives are well ahead of the Americans, who have yet to form an identifiable faction. The American-adjacent, such as Trump and most non-RINO Republicans, are only just now attempting to deal with the progressives’ emerging hold on AI governance.

As far as controlling AI in war, Trump and AI tech leaders such as Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg had an AI summit where they all promised they would “be responsible.”

President Trump wants AI as free a range as possible to develop, believing (and probably rightly so) that China, America’s main geopolitical adversary, won’t be constraining its use and development of AI as a weapon of war.

In our Futureq Report from the last issue of MIA, Paul Gordon Collier wrote “China is going down the full AI-autonomous swarm path in all domains, air, land, sea, and space, while the U.S. is developing a human supported by a drone team model. China may be betting AI can outthink humans in combat while the U.S. is betting human wisdom as a final check and director of overall action can ‘outthink’ its AI counterpart in China.

“China might also recognize the limits of authoritarian-dominated institutions in creating the kinds of humans who could run a U.S.-designed New Model Military.”

The President will be creating an AI czar who may eventually create something like the “AI Force.” This position could one day be the most powerful position in the land.

  1. SOCIAL MEDIA WATCH – The quarter started with major legislative action worldwide that targeted social media. We wrote in our July 2026 Sitrep, “The assault on an open worldwide social media is well underway. This month, those efforts have only expanded. The favorite tools of control are digital taxation, the levying of fines, requirements to monitor misinformation, ‘hate speech,’ and digital ID to keep children off the internet. The UK looks to force midnight digital curfews on teens from 16-17, with sweeping bans for children under 16.

“The push to ban children from social media is a trojan horse almost everyone sees is about censorship and control of internet access by the state. In the name of saving the children, the state will require regular digital ID verification of every user on the internet, no matter their age, to assure they’re not really under 16.

“Canada, South Korea, the UAE, and France have joined a growing list of nations using child social media bans to smuggle in social media state control and monitoring.”

We wrote in our August 2026 Sitrep, “The frontlines of the global social media battle continue to be ‘child safety’ and ‘misinformation,’ with both becoming opportunities of revenue and backdoor means of internet control by government agencies at various scales, from nation-state to local.

“Unless there is a massive reversal in trends, we see the potential for the loss of meaningful global digital discourse at a massive scale within the next 10 years. Nation-states and zones like the EU are becoming increasingly zealous of internet control tailored to their particular self-serving interests.

“Social media at a time when many nation-states already know the masses are going to be ‘asked’ to make great sacrifices for the good of the whole is fire to the flames they know they are about to fan with their draconian legislation.

“Americans support stronger oversight of social media by the state, including regulations to keep children off of it. The polls don’t ask if they support digital ID confirmations with every internet sign-in as a price for that ‘child safety’ measure.”

The trends this past month have only continued along the lines we observed in August.

The EU has announced plans to restrict social media access for children, which will required digital ID for all users to assure none of them are children. A recent study of nations that have such laws has revealed they only work in empowering the state to track adults, they are less effective at keeping children off social media sites.

The UK has gone so far that the Trump administration is concerned its censorship laws will catch Americans up in its snare. He warned Burnham’s government to be mindful of Americans’ first amendment rights.

President Trump himself is pushing the bounds of social media in the Presidency.

We reported, “President Trump’s Truth Social announced plans to offer corporations the opportunity to see the most influential Truth Social posters’ posts a few seconds before everyone else does. The offer is available only for institutional clients, specifically banks, hedge funds, and high-frequency traders. You pay for a few seconds of insider trading.

“The ethicality of the decision is being questioned across the political sphere, never mind the legality of it. The question is, is this not simply selling Presidential influence? The product is the Presidential power, not Trump’s wisdom.

The interim CEO, Kevin McGurn, said, ‘Markets are already reacting to Truth Social posts. The Truth API will provide direct, licensed access to the platform’s most market-moving content, while allowing us to monetize our own assets’”

Link to References

F. MARKET

Near the end of this quarter, the Federal Reserve moved to raise interest rates for the first time in 3 years. The decision to raise the interest rate was unanimous. The rates were raised by a quarter percentage point, making the new base range 3.75% to 4%.

The inflation rate remains above the Fed’s targeted 2% benchmark to lower rates.

The consumer price index increased by 3.4% in both July and August, with the main driver being gasoline and energy costs.

The 30-Year Treasury Bond Yield hit 5.501%, which was a high not reached since June of 2007. The spike came after U.S. economic data showed a stronger than expected economy, raising concerns there would be more Fed rate increases to combat inflationary pressures.

High oil prices have also contributed to the spike. The rate is a benchmark for long-term interest rates and long-term borrowing.

The Unemployment Rate mostly hovered around 4.2% throughout the quarter, with the last numbers reported for the month of August.

In September, private payrolls increased by 46,000 while government payrolls fell by 17,000. This is an overall healthy trend.

The Labor Market overall is growing, but not by much, with July’s revised numbers showing job losses. Wage growth is at 3%, which is well below what it had been, and reaching levels of lows not seen in a few years.

Something looming under the surface we reported in July could change the dynamic of the markets in due time: “A surge in hidden debt among AI giants like Oracle and Meta is setting off alarms in the industry. The hidden debt comes from future payment operations for expenses not yet online to make money. For instance, leases and property taxes must be paid on sites that are earmarked for databases that haven’t been built or completely built yet. The hidden debt amounts to more than $1.65 trillion.”

As pressure grows, some of the market growth from AI stocks could be taken back if investors can’t see how many of these companies plan on meeting these challenges as the massive bills come due.

If shipping has truly returned to pre-Iran War numbers, some pressures on oil pressures will be decreased, but the drone wars in Ukraine and Russia are now targeting diesel oil refineries, which is threatening truck transport, which is threatening the market as a whole.

The President has announced plans to cut this off, including making modifications of standards to allow alternative diesel to flow. He is also putting pressure, such as he can, on both Putin and Zelensky, to end targeting each other’s refineries. It remains to be seen how effective his efforts will be.

Some of the pressure on gas prices is coming from years of anti-refinery action by progressives. In 2025, we reported on California’s “success” at shutting down most of the refineries in the state. It has only gotten worse since then.

We reported then, “With two oil refineries already shut down thanks to California’s anti-energy “climate change” laws making the cost of refining increasingly non-profitable, California is desperate to hold on to another refinery, Valero, whose Benicia plant is slated to shut down in April of 2026. Lawmakers are negotiating the possibility of essentially subsidizing the plant (paying for the cost of their regulations) to the tune of $80 million minimum, $200 million max.”

AI is currently driving the markets upward, but it has a big debt problem underneath that growth. Even if both the Ukraine War and Iran War ended today, infrastructure problems worldwide, especially in America, make fixing the gas price problem not such an easy fix.

While the AI debt shadow casts a doubt for the future, $1 trillion plus worth of investments in new U.S. factory builds have yet to come online. Once they do, the dynamic in America could, theoretically, be radically different than today.

While the markets may continue to grow, the prospect for the average consumer is not bullish, but not recessionary. The market has a mix of strong and weak forces effectively putting us in a malaise-state, not quite prospering, but not quite becoming recessionary. As factories come online, however, that situation could change for the better for the average consumer and worker.

G. AGIT PROP

Here are our top two Agit Prop Headlines from each month in the quarter, starting with September (with one dishonorable mention).

  1. SEPTEMBER

Democrats are running pastors for office. Republicans are attacking their religious comments. – Politico – It is clear to the casual historically orthodox Christian that this headline was not written by someone who has a remote understanding of the faith in that historical context. To this progressive writer, the “progressive Christian” is as authentic as the historically orthodox Christian, or at least that’s what the writer wants to create in your mind with this headline.

The “Pastors” running for office in the progressive party deny Christ is God, deny the infallibility of scripture, and teach that Christ is a man with good ideals.

All of Christ’s ideals affirm their progressive worldview, which includes the belief the white race created the patterns of evil the world has been oppressed by since America was formed. The FBI attempted to codify that standard into government during the Biden administration.

The progressive writer most likely understands that, to historically orthodox Christians, their views are considered an assault on our faith, not an affirmation of it. Republicans are attacking their religious comments because they’re antithetical to basic Christian scripture-based teachings, and they legitimize anti-American, anti-Christian government policies.

These “Pastors” use Christ to demonize those who oppose abortions, who don’t believe the white devil is the greatest evil in the world, who don’t support transitioning children, and certainly those that oppose hate speech laws intended to protect “disenfranchised classes” like minor-attracted-persons and non-binaries.

To the casual “reader,” the headline gives themselves permission to dismiss any religious opposition to their progressive agenda, since this headline “confirms” Republicans (aka anyone not them) are hypocritical, because when progressives finally embrace faith in politics, Republicans just attack them.

We are sure there are progressive podcasts out there even as we write this, claiming this proves conservatives, anyone not them, never really cared about having religion in politics anyway, not when it finally “backfired” on them.

To them, the “teachings” of progressive pastors are more “Christian” than a plain reading of Romans Chapter 1.

While they call you a Nazi, which is a signal to others that you’re a military target, they tell you that your god is a god of hate, and their god is a god of love. This is pretty much the spirit this headline is giving permission to hold.

Iran is suffering yet surviving under Trump’s economic warfare – Washington Post – If Iran was a Christian country being invaded by the U.S. for not allowing gay marriages, the Washington Post headline would read “American Power Causes Major Economic Cracks in Faltering Fascist State.”

This headline was possibly written by an operative who understands what’s at stake in Iran. They may understand that the socialist model is being challenged, should an American state they don’t control too soon build the superpower AI of the next generation.

If non-progressive America’s AI beats China’s AI, this will be a major blow to the prestige status of the progressive project.

Iran as a Chinese ally gives China tremendous opportunity not only to shore up Iranian AI resources, but to continue their effort to lock down Afghanistan as an AI resource hub.

There’s more at stake than this, but, if we are right, this is the main driver of most geopolitical action by those who are pragmatically looking at the new AI reality of power. If China loses Iran, Afghanistan opens up for America, which could significantly set back China’s AI resource potential in the immediate years to come.

If this is our theoretical operative at work, this headline first humanizes Iran. They don’t refer to them as the Islamic Republic. They are looking for casual reader programming here, meaning, they are targeting headline-only readers with these types of headlines.

The intent is to erode support for the war at home. This might be one of two CCP strategies to offset American military advantage. That advantage is still very real, though not quite as supreme, yet still dominant. The other strategy is to spread AI horror stories, real or imagined, to slow down U.S. AI development through politics.

While it humanizes Iran, it vilifies U.S. action, referring to it not as American action, but Trump action. To the one either relying on agit prop organs like Politico for “news” or being fed the headline from influencers or memes on social media sites (which is where most of the actual influence by the progressive state press exists), they have been told the poor Iranians are being unjustly harmed by a man they already know is “literally worse than Hitler.”

This makes the action inherently evil, and not even American, so they can easily cheer for the Iranians at their own, and our (their unfortunate neighbors) expense. They can wish harm, essentially, on themselves and their American neighbors without having to nakedly face the fact they are rooting against the land that butters their bread.

The blood and bone cost of living is not real to these ideologues, all built around the spirit that the world is a battle between good, their ideology, and evil, the white devil and his enablers (which is basically anyone who does not sign up for the whole program).

To this headline writer, they are defending the world against America, even as they thrive off the fat of its land. To the American, this headline might as well have been written by the Iranian mullahs themselves. It is no wonder the Iranians have endorsed the Democrats in the upcoming midterm election.

We want to give a dishonorable mention to this headline, First Trump Came for Immigrants. Then He Came for Their Lawyers. – Mother Jones – The “immigrants” in that headline are illegal aliens. The “lawyers” are progressive lawyers willfully breaking the law to protect the illegal aliens. The people really coming for your neighbors are the writers of Mother Jones painting an assassin’s bullseye on ICE agents with that headline.

  1. AUGUST

A Trump Judge Called Mail-In Ballots a Threat to Democracy – Mother Jones – This headline from Mother Jones sets the tone by starting out with “A Trump Judge….” This lets its progressive audience know what follows next is on-its-face, will be unfounded nonsense of the highest order.

That unfounded nonsense is “Called Mail in Ballots a Threat to Democracy.”

The word “Democracy” is THEIR word, not the word of conservatives, or even Americans. We both prefer “Republic.” The word “Democracy” tells the reader that Mail in Ballots and Democracy go together, and challenging Mail in Ballots is more intrusive to the Democratic election process than the Mail in Ballots are themselves.

As for any concerns about ballots that are not verified to be sent by actual citizens who actually chose the selections on the ballot, this is what Mother Jones has to say about that,

“There is no evidence that mail-in ballots are ‘prone to fraud.’ An analysis from the Brookings Institution found an ‘average total mail voting fraud percentage across the 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 general elections of only 0.000043 [percent].’ Or, about 4 votes per 10 million votes. Mail-in voting can be very important for disabled and aging people, who otherwise may have to deal with accessibility challenges with getting to the polls and access issues when voting itself.”

Brookings Institute is part of the network of the Progressive State Press.

There you have it, no worries there. Progressives, trust us, right now we’re cheating to protect the world from the white devil. When the white devil is vanquished, we’ll stop cheating, promise.

FBI seizes Swalwell’s devices, executes search warrants in sexual misconduct probe – CBS News – CBS News is protecting the Democratic Party from being rightly sullied with the real story. The headline should read, FBI ABRUPTLY SEIZES SWALWELL’S PHONE AT AIRPORT INVESTIGATING CCP SPY TIES.

A shorter headline might read, CCP-CONNECTED SWALWELL GETS PHONE TAKEN BY FBI AT AIRPORT.

They start their headline with “FBI,” which is hated at present by their targeted audience, progressive influencers. This telegraphs the narrative to combat the real story; a prominent Democrat once thought of as a potential future Presidential candidate was having an ongoing affair with a Chinese spy.

His sexual aggression with other women is what got him removed, but the FBI was there to find evidence that connects Swalwell to the CCP, not more evidence of his sexual deviancy.

Note they also leave out of the headline the airport confiscation, for it would create the proper context for this highly irregular action. They want it to seem banal, not rightly concerning.

  1. JULY

Trump threatens survival of American democracy with election rigging efforts – The Hill – The progressive state media’s constant mantra of democracy is a subliminal rewiring of the American mind from the checks and balances processes of republics to generic claims of having the will of the people.

Here, the Hill couples that rewiring strategy with a demonization of President Trump intended to incite more violence against the President.

The Hill is claiming the President’s questioning of mass mailer elections is tantamount to treason. This gives those inclined to rescue the democracy by any means all the justification they need to continue to use violence as a means of political persuasion.

How Republicans paved the way for white nationalists to invade DC – Daily Kos – The primary justification for reducing their political opponents to executable targets is the white devil myth.

Here we see one of the greatest purveyors of this terrorist-inspiring narrative, the Daily Kos, which is once again engaging in violence-inciting polemics. The readers of this headline will continue to feel emboldened to take violent, coercive action against anyone they perceive as supporting the white devil republicans.

H. ASSESSMENT

These are brief analyses of key aspects of each of our major summarized categories, U.S. Politics, Geopolitics, Culture and Sci-Tech. We start with our Bellwether of the Quarter.

  1. THE PROGRESSIVE STATE – The difference between the typical conservative and the progressive is becoming increasingly harder to ignore, especially when “the quiet parts out loud” parts are now just normal discourse for the most powerful Democrats.

Conservatives may have one foot in the “equality” part of progressivism, but they see themselves fundamentally as constitution-based Americans. As the non-political conservatives have now been profoundly affected by progressive state and corporate power, the “equality” part of their lives may soon be falling away.

“Equality” to the American means everyone gets an equal chance to demonstrate their individual excellence. “Equality” to the progressive means state and corporate power picking winners and losers based on preferred social class.

“Equality” to the progressive means discrimination, un-banking, un-personing, arrest and incarceration, and finally, and not excluding, execution.

Now, conservative “normies” are starting to understand the language games progressives play to guilt “well-meaning” Americans into signing up for anti-American policies, like “hate speech” laws and censorship.

  1. U.S. POLITICS – The progressives seem to be in go big go home mode this last quarter, allowing themselves to openly partner with a political organization that calls for the dismantling of the American republic.

This tells us they either believe they have the power to finally break the dependency on the American story for their legitimacy as government authority, or believe they are close to running out of time to fight back at all.

Wherever they have state power and media power, they appear willing to make themselves criminally at risk should American or conservative authority prevail. At present, they face executive power threats at the Federal level. Within their progressive-dominant states, they have a host of progressive judges to aid them in slowing down or cancelling any part of the Trump plan they can.

The President is attempting to root out of government all vestiges of progressive administrative power, but, fortunately for the progressives, he doesn’t recognize progressivism as the existential threat to America that it is, or else he doesn’t feel he has the power to act decisively on it.

Even the Executive Branch has plenty of progressive operatives within it, all willing to do anything necessary to stop what they mostly believe is the white devil’s attempt to recolonize and enslave the world. There are plenty of “brilliant” ruthless opportunists within that camp, existential larpers willing to use progressivism as a psychological bludgeon against competition.

For the sociopathic and psychotic, progressivism is an excellent vehicle of power when state and corporate power have your back. Our federal government is filled with such people, people who rose to power using the anti-white, anti-heteronormative ideology of progressivism.

These people understand language theory. They understand the power of language structures to coercively force public action. To lose state and corporate backing is to become a stench to the neighbors you destroyed.

If the corporate-state progressive alliance is broken, the millions of people who reported on their competition violations of the woke code, who openly called for and supported the un-personing of their own family members and friends, will suddenly find themselves confronted by all the enemies they’ve made these past ten years.

At the ground level, the language game advantage of the progressive is being broken. “Conservative” Americans who for decades hardly thought of, let alone talked about, politics, are now becoming experts in language theory. They have become inured to the power of “Equality,” for now they know the anti-white, anti-American assumptions and policies behind the progressive version of that word.

By necessity, they are learning the difference between American equality and Progressive equality, one leads to human flourishing, American equality, and one leads to genocidal rage and police states, Progressive equality.

This midterm election will not end the war, one way or another, but the results, one way or another, are sure to further make clear to Americans the difference between America’s equality and the Progressive State’s version.

  1. GEOPOLITICS – We are seeing more and more signs of nations willing to consider non-traditional alliances as AI realities of power become clearer. We have begun to see the emergence of countries attempting to carve out niches, like data center hub candidates.

We have only just begun to see the new AI resource finds that are sure to come as Rare Earth Minerals and other resources become even more highly desired.

The first round in the AI Wars may one day be considered the capture of Venezuela’s former dictator and Chinese ally, Nicholas Maduro, on “drug charges.” Just like that, Trump telegraphed to China that the geopolitical AI wars were on.

Shortly afterwards, Trump found reason to target China’s next great overseas hub of power, Iran. This hub of power was a flank against competing influencers for Afghan power. Iran offers China a Middle East beachhead, cheap oil, and a buffer zone between what it hopes will become its de facto province, Afghanistan, and U.S. and “Western” competition.

As we have documented, Afghanistan is AI-resource-rich, and as a province, China would get a sweetheart of a deal. While the U.S. might not need the resource as much as China, preventing China from accessing a cheap AI resource would go a long way to slow China’s AI development down.

The bottom line is a super AI brain needs excellent “programming,” excellent hardware, and MASSIVE, EFFICIENT data centers. Think of this as the start of World War Two for the U.S. when it had to convert factories to war factories and began the process of building a massive machine to win a multi-front global war.

The difference is EVERY country that can is in the same place as the U.S., so AI resources are ever increasingly becoming the main driver of geopolitical maneuvering.

Iran remains the most important bellwether in Geopolitics, but it is fed by and feeds many major news trends, including an ever-more-dangerous one, the battle between the Progressive-Islamist alliance and the Ethnic recent natives (the last thousand plus years) of Europe, including the UK.

Wherever Islamists are given government-supported aid to invade European countries, we find progressive authority behind it. They are importing destroyers of white power, not realizing they are importing something far worse than even the worst lie they tell about the “white devil” to their “children” when they go to sleep.

The war between the individual and the progressive state is worldwide. The war between the sovereign nation-state and the progressive state is worldwide.

  1. CULTURE – Across America, we see pockets of defiant resistance to the “woke” ideology, but not a recognition of what might be one of the most effective psychological weapons of “woke” ideology, the myth of “choice.”

There are two main vehicles of power that entice people to join the progressive fold, one is the white devil lie (and all the white-enabling groups the individual can now eliminate from competition with the flimsiest of accusations) and the other is the “choice” lie.

We have been highlighting the “white devil” narrative throughout this report, so here we will focus on the narrative that gave power to the white devil lie, the narrative that gave “good people” permission to accustom themselves to sub-humanizing humans.

This is where many “conservatives” are captured by progressive notions of “equality,” equating “choice” as a manifestation of “equality” because it gives the woman an “equal” right to non-consequential sex as the man has (excluding, of course, STDs, but even on that front “science” is reducing the consequences of that as well).

To get there, however, the conservative had to heuristically let go of the bedrock of the justification for American authority, a demonstrated restraint of power in recognition of the “endowed by their creator” human being.

The American human had “authority” of self-stewardship granted them by forces outside of creation itself. The government “of” the people had to be a government that recognized the self-stewardship “sovereignty” of the people themselves.

To avoid dismantling American Rule of Law directly, the justices in 1973 had to define a person as one who was born. Later, the person was elevated to “viable outside the womb.”

But heuristically, your body knows you are sub-humanizing the most innocent of human life. No matter the doctored language you want to invent, you have reduced a whole human being to a stage of life. This is not a scientific definition of a life.

This is a definition that attempts to preserve American Rule of Law by allowing the most innocent human of us all, the unborn, to be defined as un-human.

Like the definition of 3/5 of a man to preserve another evil, slavery, while preserving the new American Rule of Law, based on that same creator-ordained self-stewarding “sovereign,” the attempt to sterilize evil in legal doublespeak cannot conceal the spirit its truth unleashes.

America would not survive 100 years with that subterfuge within them, and the subterfuge of “whole life reduced to a stage in life” in American Rule of Law is doing to us now what 3/5 of a person did to us then. Conservatives, however, are mostly in support of preserving some form of government power to define human life as a stage, not the whole human.

We do our work not just to serve our subscribers, but to preserve for posterity that there were some willing to boldly proclaim the evil that befell our land either right before the end or right before the better second act.

We believe we are living at such times, and we urge our readers, and ourselves, to temper righteous anger with tender mercy, especially where contrition starts.

We also want to add that while we believe the “white devil” narrative is real and not hyperbolic, it does not justify ACTUALLY BECOMING a “white devil,” someone who assumes their skin color gives them special rights to treat non-whites as less than Americans.

While white nationalists are not a real threat to the American republic, at present, we do recognize they exist. Their ideology is as anti-American, anti-human, anti-Christ as the progressive, and it comes from the same font, the social-self vehicle of power.

This is where the ideal social is possible, and thus violence is justified in implementing it. On that front, there is no difference between the white nationalist and the progressive, or, for that matter, the Islamist.

These people are where the pattern of individualism without consequence ends, with the illusion of ONE SOCIAL that every member imagines is really only themselves. This is the self making non-selfness disappear. This is the self making consequence disappear, except for the non-selves.

  1. SCI-TECH – All around the world there are nation-states in power where their nation’s story that justifies both state power and unity is either destroyed or on life support. Even China is suffering from this crisis, as is the United States. It is in that chaos that two radically human-altering technologies, AI and Social Media, have come to loggerheads with both international power and sovereign state power.

The major corporations driving these technologies have a history of working agreeably with the state whenever the state puts the least bit of pressure on it (ESPECIALLY when progressives are in power).

Witness the instant caving of American principles by companies like Twitter and YouTube during the Biden administration, who both acquiesced to the new progressive rule of law.

Yet here these same corporations that have been making bank off international social media platforms now find themselves facing what might be an international extinction event, or near-extinction event.

This is being triggered by the needs of nation-states to control both social media revenue and social media power. In the AI Wars, exploitation will be deemed a necessary “sacrifice” for the state to make.

The less American our state becomes, the more exploitation will follow. Where the state has no constraint on its power, exploitation will proceed in the service of building an AI brain the progressive state feels confident will stay in its hands.

We are beginning to formulate a shadow of an outline of a possibility of the new moral fear narratives competing factions might adopt. These new narratives might mostly center around the use of AI, as well how much suffering citizens should accept in the name of supporting their nation-state’s AI brain build.

I. RECOMMENDED ACTION

Our mission here is to give our readers a sense of the reality of power specifically in the U.S., but also to a lesser degree the rest of the world. We analyze from a Christian Americanist perspective, though most of this analysis was primarily from an Americanist perspective.

One thing most of our readers have in common with one another is their Americanism, their wanting to preserve and/or restore life flourishing values of liberty for themselves, their children, and their children’s children.

We appeal to our readers, as we have for some time, to find Americans, steward your own sense of what “American” means, and network with one another to become more self-sustaining between yourselves. We continue that appeal.

We are not seeing as many independent small-scale AI and Social Media alternatives being built, or even talked about, as we’d like to see. While we see some AI technologies offering a promise of small-scale AI brain development, at present AI is a big state’s game.

The best we who are seeking self-stewardship living can do at present is to develop our own open-source AI agents on our own hardware. They still rely on a core (massive data centers, for instance) beyond our capacity to duplicate, but in the near future that reality may significantly change.

If you’re going to build your own AI agents, you will need to know how to govern them.

From our Tools of Engagement in our September Monthly issue: “For you, the rise of AI means two things, learning how to work without AI tools, or learning how to effectively use AI tools. For most, the latter is more realistic than the former.

For those in the latter group, we recommend you make it a regular habit to utilize multiple AI agents, including open-source AI agents. This will prevent you from becoming too attached or dependent on one AI “voice.” It will also get you overall better results, especially with research.

We utilize multiple AIs during our research process.

Here are resources to help you prepare for a world with AI without becoming AI’s tool:

We also recommend registering to vote if you intend on only voting straight Republican. This is not a recognition of the Republican Party as an American Party, but rather as a hold while American Parties form (and we are still hoping they soon will).

We understand not voting for personal convictions, but no vote should be cast for the party of insurrection, the de factor progressive party, which is also the progressive state (for leftists, the party and the state are the same thing, this is also true, generally, of fascists).

We have these recommendations for President Trump; win in Iran, declare an insurrection, arrest the top progressive leaders (in ALL major institutions), and hold public, fair trials exposing their treason and collusion with foreign powers.

There are politicians, journalists, doctors, teachers, on that list, but these prosecutions should only target the top leaders in the targeted progressive institutions. If they become too broad, you become the monster you fight, and innocents will be caught up in the violent hysteria to come.

We also recommend he ends Palantir’s contract with the government and cease all efforts to digitize our lives in a central database.

Above all else, we recommend he declare a national emergency and shut down the public schools. Every teacher that taught children about white privilege, gender transitioning, and sexual exploration should be laid off and given a path back to teaching through re-certification.

The leaders of the school districts, the school boards, the civic governments, should face various levels of prosecution, with a very small percentage potentially facing capital offense charges (the ones who knew full well the psychological terrorism they were, and still are, inflicting).

Again, if your prosecutorial targets are too broad, especially the capital offense ones, you will create chaos, you will not restore confidence in American Rule of Law.

If you don’t offer paths to redemption to the vast majority of progressives, you will create a sectarian, block by block, civil war. As it is, there will be violence, but paths back to redemption will dramatically decrease that pressure.

We write this for history’s sake, not expecting the President to see this, let alone consider it.

PREDICTIVE ANALYSIS

We predict greater attention will be made to the Caspian Sea region over the next coming months as we witness AI geopolitical realities beginning to take form.

At home, we will wait until our October 30 issue to reveal our predictive analysis for the election and what might come whether Republicans or Democrats win.

We are at the death knells of the white devil narratives in America, and that will produce more violence from those who built their power from it. It is not dying so much because opinions will be changed but because the narratives don’t produce quality human managers of AI.

Some measure of merit-based culling must be restored, but white devil narratives call merit a dog whistle for white supremacism.

We are not quite sure what the new moral “angels and demons” stories will be, but we are beginning to catch a glimpse of them, though not one clear enough to share just yet.

Yet, in the death knells of a terrible story, we have reason to resist, speak plainly, frankly, bluntly in opposition to it, and sever associations, where possible, with institutions that continue to derive their power from it.

In the death knells of a terrible story, the fanaticism of the true believers will only increase, and when one party, the Democratic Party, still needs street fighters, that’s the ready-made pool to draw from, cultivate, and fund.

Rhetoric from progressive state media will only increase even as it cries “1st Amendment” while being fully in support of all the great censorship actions of the past ten years, from the “Replacement” Theory to Covid-19 to the 2020 Election.

The latest one is that “Mass Mailer Elections are perfectly safe, and only fascists and MAGA oppose it.”

This land continues to not recognize how empowering to the progressive spirit “life as a stage and not the whole” principle is. When this line is granted to the state and is given as a justification for a woman’s right to “choose,” it creates the underlying condition to accept the next premise.

The first premise is that unborn life can be sub-humanized. The second premise is the white race can be sub-humanized as well. Only then is American liberty a threat to your life and not the necessary condition for human flourishing.

As the spirit of the nation goes with abortion, we believe, so too will it go for America. If we accept “choice” as an “American” value, we must build our republic on a new foundation, for the old one is dead, for surely an unborn child is as endowed by our creator as we are.

If the most vulnerable is not protected from the powerful, none of us are, and this is really the era of “might makes right,” for that is the only true value a nation without a sacred individual can truly hold.

This is what the principle of “endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights” creates for the peaceful weak. This is what protects everyone, weak or strong, from the violently persuasive. The aborted child is a symbol of the death of the American republic.

What we should look for as signs that a new, more fulfilled republic, could be in our future are for more and more people discovering their Americanism, then American clubs will start to form, not coopted by fascists and other non-Americans.

We should see a country coming to grips with the reality of child sacrifice, an offering of forgiveness for the women and men who participated in “legal” abortions, and a crying out to end the practice.

As the bill comes due for many women who chose casual sex and career over family, the cost of “casual sex” is becoming increasingly not-so-casual. It might even be apocalyptic in that it leads the human race to expire through lack of reproduction.

As more people notice these outcomes, perhaps we will be shaken from our 50-year-plus built-up tolerance to unborn child murder.