pgnewser

Democrats Officially Hit the Panic Button in New Hampshire Senate Race – RedState– redstate.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

A couple of weeks ago, RedState reported on how the New Hampshire Senate race was becoming one to keep an eye on due to how the contest was shaping up as the race prepares to enter the general election campaign season.

The primary is Tuesday, September 8th, and if the current polling bears out, we’ll see former Sen. John E. Sununu (R) take on four-term Democrat Rep. Chris Pappas (NH-01) to determine who gets to fill the seat being vacated by Democrat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, who opted not to run for reelection. Shaheen defeated Sununu, who served one term, in 2008.

As we noted in our reporting, late August polling on a hypothetical matchup from the University of New Hampshire (UNH) and 7NEWS showed a tight race, “statistically tied,”  but with Sununu having a slight two-point edge, though within the margin of error.

Newsom: DSA Ideas Are Being Worked Into Dem Platform– www.breitbart.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

During a portion of an interview aired on Monday’s “PBS NewsHour,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said that the DSA’s ideas are being worked into the platform of Democrats and said that part of the DSA platform is “about recognizing that we’ve got a planet that is getting hotter and drier, and that we’ve got to address the issue of climate change, and we want energy security, and we want to move off fossil fuels. That’s a DSA position. That’s a mainstream position within the Democratic Party.”

Co-host Amna Nawaz asked, “So, let me ask you about how Democrats can win back control of Congress, because it’s been a pretty revealing primary season for the party, right? A reckoning, some have called it, too. You saw how many wins DSA candidates, Democratic Socialist candidates, were able to win, Donavan McKinney in Michigan, Chris Rabb in Pennsylvania, Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, he doesn’t identify as DSA, but was sort of aligned with them. If you have these candidates and this platform that is clearly animating the base, energizing turnout, should more of those ideas be worked into the broader Democratic platform?”

Newsom answered, “I think they are. We want money out of politics. I’ve been supporting clean money campaigns for decades. We have a public finance –.”

Nawaz then cut in to say, “But there seems to be a little distance between some leadership and those DSA candidates.”

Serbia’s government proposes dissolving Parliament for early election– abcnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

BELGRADE, Serbia — The Serbian government on Monday proposed dissolving Parliament, setting in motion a procedure for scheduling an early parliamentary election that could see President Aleksandar Vucic switch to the post of prime minister.

The vote is seen as a test of Vucic’s tight rule in Serbia after over a year of mass street protests. It will be held in an atmosphere of heightened political tensions as ruling populists seek to hold on to power despite widespread popular discontent.

Vucic is expected to formally set the date later this week. He has said that the ballot likely will be held on Oct. 25.

Protests in Serbia started after a train station tragedy on Nov. 1, 2024, in northern Serbia’ killed 16 people. The protesters demanded accountability for the concrete canopy collapse in Novi Sad and an end to corruption they believed was the cause for bad renovation work.

More than a year of demonstrations sometimes drawing hundreds of thousands of people shook Vucic more than ever during his 14 years in power. The president and his right-wing Serbian Progressive Party have been accused of curbing democratic freedoms and of ties to organized crime, which he has denied. Serbia’s bid to join the European Union has stalled under Vucic, who has maintained close ties with both Russia and China.

Vucic has faced additional EU pressure in the past week over public homage to war criminal Ratko Mladic, the former Bosnian Serb army commander, who was buried as a hero in Serbia on Monday despite a U.N. court conviction.

Vucic has said he would resign the post so he can join the campaign for the parliamentary vote. He cannot run for the presidency again after serving two almost full terms. An early presidential election will be held separately.

Vucic has pushed hard against the protesters, sparking international concern over police violence and arbitrary detentions. He has accused the students and professors behind the protests of an intention to “destroy the state.”

The student-backed election list for Parliament is expected to include university professors and experts.

The populists have gradually taken over Serbia’s institutions and mainstream media after coming to power in 2012.

 

Houthis launch attack on Saudi Arabia airbase where fighter fleet is located– www.mirror.co.uk
News Source
EXCERPT:

A video shows smoke and balls of fire rising from trucks at a camp of the Saudi-backed government forces

The Houthis militant group have reportedly fired ballistic missiles and drones on Saudi Arabian oil facilities and an air base.

A drone was shot down in the overnight attack over Khamis Mushait at such a low altitude that the interception shattered windows, according to reports.

Footage circulating on social media reportedly shows the intercept happening above the buildings of the southwestern Saudi city.

The city is home to King Khalid Air Base, when much of the Middle Eastern kingdom’s fighter fleet is located.

Khamis Mushait has been a Houthi target for years because of the base.

 

Federal Unions Act Like a Deep State Against Trump– www.dailysignal.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Who ultimately decides how the executive branch works? Is it the president, elected by the American people, or career federal employees and the unions that represent them?

The American Federation of Government Employees, the largest union representing federal employees, sued the White House’s Office of Personnel Management last month, aiming to block new rules governing how federal employees are evaluated, disciplined, and removed.

The lawsuit represents only the latest in a long series of legal challenges the union has brought against President Donald Trump’s administration since January 2025. According to a July roundup AFGE posted on its website, the union had filed 18 lawsuits against the administration before the latest case.

These lawsuits have targeted a wide range of administration initiatives, including government-wide reorganizations, workforce reductions, collective bargaining restrictions, employee classification reforms, and changes to federal personnel rules.

AFGE has been far from alone in these cases. Democracy Forward, a left-leaning legal advocacy organization that has represented plaintiffs in numerous lawsuits challenging Trump policies, has represented AFGE or other plaintiffs in these cases. Such challenges have involved broad coalitions, including advocacy groups and local governments, alongside labor unions.

Critics argue that these cases amount to more than traditional labor litigation, representing a form of institutional resistance from federal employees and their allies against an elected administration’s effort to reshape the executive branch.

AFGE rejects that characterization. A union spokesman told The Daily Signal that issues involving “politicization of government, corruption, and the refusal to recognize legally valid union contracts” are inseparable from “the everyday experience of federal workers.” The spokesman also accused the administration of engaging in “illegal and retaliatory union-busting” and broader efforts to “rig the system.”

Iran-Backed Proxy Group Launches Ground Offensive Aimed At Further Disrupting Global Shipping– trendingpoliticsnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Yemen’s Houthi militants — an Iran-backed group that has controlled large swaths of the country’s northwest for more than a decade — have launched a renewed offensive aimed at taking control of a vital Red Sea port.

Yemen has been divided by civil war since 2014, when Houthi forces from the country’s north seized the capital city of Sanaa. The Houthis, a Zaydi Shia movement that formed in the 1990s, now administer most of what was historically North Yemen. This includes Sanaa, the densely populated highlands, and the Red Sea port of Hodeidah.

This accounts for the majority of Yemen’s population.

The internationally recognized government, supported by Saudi Arabia and based mainly in the south, holds Aden, much of the east and south, and the oil-producing area around Marib. Taiz, one of Yemen’s largest cities, remains split. Front lines changed little after a 2022 nationwide truce until fighting intensified in 2026.

The Houthis’ current holdings give them a long coastline on the Red Sea and positions from which they can reach the Bab al-Mandab Strait, the narrow passage connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden.

Earlier this month, the Houthis opened a ground offensive in western Taiz governorate. The operation targeted roads linking the city of Taiz to the government-held port of Mokha and sought to move closer to high ground overlooking approaches to Bab al-Mandab.

Clashes have been the heaviest in years, with more than 300 combatants and some civilians reported killed. Government forces later recaptured parts of Hays district in Hodeidah province and some heights west of Taiz, while Houthi units cut the Taiz–Mokha road at least temporarily.

Russia Orders Closures of German Consulate and Cultural Centers in Tit-for-Tat Move– www.themoscowtimes.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Monday it was shuttering the German consulate in St. Petersburg and German cultural centers across the country.

The closures were announced in retaliation for Germany’s decision last week to close the Russian consulate in Bonn and a Russian cultural center in Berlin after its government blamed Moscow for an attempted drone attack at Leipzig/Halle Airport last month.

Moscow gave diplomats and employees at the German Consulate General in St. Petersburg until Sept. 18 to cease operations and leave Russia.

Staff at Germany’s Goethe-Institut cultural center branches in Moscow, St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg were given until this Sunday.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said it summoned Germany’s ambassador in Moscow to inform him about the retaliatory decisions.

“It was the German authorities who once again provoked a new spiral of escalation in bilateral relations. Full responsibility for the consequences lies entirely with the German government,” the Russian ministry said in a statement.

President Vladimir Putin accused Germany of planting evidence in order to blame Moscow for the early August incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport.

On Sunday, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claimed Berlin’s accusations against Moscow amounted to “an effective declaration of war against us.”

Lavrov said last week that Moscow would respond to the closure of its cultural center in Berlin by closing the Goethe-Institut cultural centers across Russia.

Russia’s first Goethe-Institut opened in Moscow in 1992, soon after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

FCC Warns of Crackdown on Corporate Media’s ‘Fake Polls’ Ahead of Midterms– slaynews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr says the agency could soon issue guidance warning broadcast networks about airing “fake polls” that could be used to suppress voters ahead of the midterm elections.

Carr said broadcasters operate under a fundamentally different set of obligations from cable networks and online platforms because they use federally licensed public airwaves.

“The one thing that President Donald Trump gets, fundamentally, is that broadcast TV is completely different than other forms of distribution, including cable,” Carr said Sunday.

“And so many broadcasters right now, they [want to] break the deal that they cut with the American people,” Carr continued.

“They get billions of dollars in taxpayer, effectively, subsidized distribution.

“And what they’re supposed to do in exchange is operate in the public interest, not some sort of narrow partisan interest.”

Carr Warns About ‘Fake Polls’ Ahead of Midterms

Carr said the FCC is examining several potential actions involving broadcasters, specifically pointing to concerns about polling presented to television audiences.

“I think President Trump is over the target, and we’re looking at a lot of actions,” Carr said.

“For instance, there’s a lot of interest right now in fake polls that are out there,” he continued.

INGERSOLL: Three Angry, Old Women Failed To Convince The Lone Juror– dailycaller.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Below is State of the Day, a morning newsletter by Daily Caller Editor-at-Large Geoff Ingersoll. Sign up here.

__________

Greetings, Dear Reader,

I might have mentioned this in previous State of the Days, but my favorite bit of Ingersoll genealogy is that I’m related to the guy who hosted the first ever witch trials … in a bar.

Lieutenant Nathaniel Ingersoll was a prominent local business owner, militia member, and church leader. Of the 20 women he either accused or testified against, eight were hanged.

By the way, did you see …

THE THREE CRONES

There’s The Fates, The Grey Sisters, The Norns, and most popularly due to Shakespeare, The Weird Sisters, and then there’s the three batty crones who appeared on local television last night to complain incessantly about the one juror who refused to acquit Lindsay Clancy.

The three, who (ironically?) appeared on NBC and CBS Boston, made no attempt to mask their disgust of the prosecution and the lone male juror who refused to acquiesce to their appeals.

They accused the prosecution of lacking “compassion.” They said there was no “smoking gun” to prove Clancy’s guilt. They called the holdout juror “very arrogant” for not listening to the “nurses” in the room.

Yes, there were nurses in the room. Not that I want to digress, but some people are calling their reliance on external “expertise” cause for a mistrial. And to not digress further: About one third of nurses have some form of mental illness themselves!

Moving on … in the most disturbing clip of all, which simply must be watched, the three of them utterly lambast the holdout.

Here’s a transcript, emphasis mine (I’m withholding juror names, if you want to find them, it’s not difficult):

Juror 1:
He had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt after we watched that video of the interview. I think that’s when it was. He admitted he had reasonable doubt, and I started filling out the forms. I was so excited. There were three forms I had to fill out, and I started filling them out. I wrote my signature on each one, and then he said, “But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.”

Juror 2:

He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said. He tried to ask a question about the medications, and we went back to the report from South Shore Hospital. We had the toxicology report. We could see exactly the amounts. The nurses in the room spoke to that. That was a question that he had. And he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him.

Juror 3:

I’m not sure if “rogue” is the right word. But every one of us, in the hours of our frustration, would get up and walk the room, because you just couldn’t sit anymore, and would all go to the cart with the exhibits. He, I think, got up to the cart once, very briefly, and went back to his seat. He would not interact with us and try to understand.

We read to him on numerous occasions the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge Sullivan’s instruction. He actually said one day in the end, “Well, why don’t we have the judge come in and read it again?” And we were like, “No. We have it in front of us. We don’t need that.” And we would highlight it — this is the definition of reasonable doubt. But he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.

I genuinely had to do a double take when I read that last portion. He couldn’t get past “the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”

Well no kidding, huh?

(Also, I’m not sure what exactly the third one is on, but her speech was slurred enough to call for a roadside test.)

We’ve also got the rapidly infamous “no smoking gun” assertion from a fourth juror who (wisely) chose to stay anonymous.

But she also recounted how she’d essentially been bullied into an acquittal despite her initial intuition.

Transcript:

Juror:

A majority of the people — it doesn’t matter what side it was on — was very firm in their stance and their beliefs kind of from the beginning. This standalone juror was not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side. So I’m going to kind of defend that individual in a sense. There were some big personalities in that room. But at the end of the day, it just came down to an inability to move past your convictions. And even after that dynamite charge, to be unable to self-analyze yourself and be like, ‘Okay, am I missing something? Am I failing to acknowledge or give this doubt the weight that it needs?’ That majority of the room was trying to sway that person from the very beginning.

Reporter:

So where did you come down from the very beginning? What was your vote?

Juror:

Originally I felt as though she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it. And maybe I still believe that in a certain way. I think that this was a woman who was not mentally healthy. She was someone that was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis. I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out. And this was the only option.

Truly wild.

… what an evolution of the term. From “ugly, withered or unpleasant” to “wise and respected post-menopausal woman.”

MORE LINKS

Leftist Professor Doxxes ICE Agent, Urges Crowd To ‘F*ck Him Up’

This is who is teaching the next generation.

ROOKE: Trump Admin’s Boastful Post Shows We’re Leaving Half Of Country Behind

What are all the men up to?

Trump Honors ‘The Man In The Red Bandana’ With Medal Of Freedom

A nice moment.


Oil hits $100 for first time since July as chaos continues in Strait of Hormuz– www.independent.co.uk
News Source

EXCERPT:

The price of oil crossed the $100 a barrel mark for the first time since July as continued chaos in the Middle East spooked the market.

As the market opened on Wednesday, the price for Brent Crude – the benchmark for oil across the world – hit $100.19 at around 8.15am. It later dropped slightly to $99 shortly after.

The ⁠Middle East conflict escalated ‌this week after Iranian-backed Houthi forces in Yemen launched strikes on several Saudi cities, drawing a ‌key US ally further into ‌the war.

Meanwhile, the US military has said it’s destroyed five Iranian tankers carrying crude following attempts to strike a US Navy warship with ballistic missiles.

Iran claimed to have attacked two American vessels and eight oil tankers in the Gulf. Shipping crews near Kuwaiti and Bahraini ports were warned to abandon their vesels.

The latest attacks threaten to deepen disruptions to Middle East oil supplies, already strained by strikes on ⁠regional energy infrastructure and key shipping lanes.

Brent crude prices were last this high in late July.

This is a breaking news story. More to follow.


OMISSION: Networks SILENT on Canada-China Military Talks– www.newsbusters.org
News Source

EXCERPT:

The Elitist Media evening news continue their mission on trade, acting as spokespeople for the Canadian prime minister instead of reporting the full scope of US-Canada relations that led to the breakdown at the negotiating table. Over the weekend and through today, an alarming omission emerges.

It appears that the media insist on glossing over the influence that China may have over Canada. In this case, we are only finding out about a high-level security meeting because China disclosed it. Per the Toronto Star:

As the Carney government pursues deeper relations with Beijing, the Chinese government reports it held a “candid” exchange on military issues with Canadian officials earlier this month.

The meeting – which Beijing said took place in Canada on Sept. 4 – followed years of diplomatic strain and is raising concerns among Conservatives, who reject the idea of military co-operation with China.

China’s defence ministry revealed the two countries held their fifth defence co-ordination dialogue last week. Canada’s Defence Department confirmed that report days later.

It’s worth noting that the countries’ military meetings were suspended in 2018 after the Trudeau administration arrested Huawei’s CEO. Their resumption at this particular juncture seems highly questionable. 

Even more questionable is the Elitist Media’s refusal to so much as mention China- whether it’s the military meeting or Canada’s insistence on laundering dumped Chinese steel as their own, which sunk the trade negotiations to begin with.

ABC World News Tonight addressed Canada only within the context of the retaliatory tariffs imposed by Canada. Rachel Scott being Rachel Scott, she made sure to close by quoting Prime Minister Mark Carney.  

 

 

ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT

9/8/26

6:39 PM

RACHEL SCOTT: Tonight, Americans are also feeling the impact of President Trump’s trade war with Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney imposing tariffs on $20 billion worth of American goods after President Trump imposed steep tariffs on Canadian goods, Carney saying tonight “we relied too much on one economic partner and it’s clear that time is over.” David.

DAVID MUIR: Rachel Scott on the breaking developments tonight. Rachel, thank you.

What’s remarkable about ABC’s Canada reporting, tacked on at the end of their White House roundup, is that there isn’t even a mention of President Trump’s proposed ban against Bombardier aircraft- let alone China. The reporting was narrowly focused on the Canadian point of view, as is normally the case on the most Trump-deranged of the Elite Media broadcast networks. 

CBS’s Canada reporting on the Evening News was slightly better. There was at least a mention of Bombardier, but still no mention of China.

 

 

CBS EVENING NEWS

9/8/26

6:43 PM

TONY DOKOUPIL: Canadian tariffs took effect today and about $20 billion of U.S. goods, the latest escalation in a trade war with no clear end. Here’s our Chief White House Correspondent, Nancy Cordes.

NANCY CORDES: Canada made good on its threat today, imposing hefty new tariffs on U.S. dairy, steel, aluminum and appliances after trade talks broke down last month.

MARK CARNEY: We can’t let American goods into Canada tariff free, while they charge our companies to export them.

CORDES: The tariffs apply to just a slice of U.S. goods. But the risk is a spiral of retaliation, reminiscent of president trump’s trade war with China last year.

DONALD TRUMP: Canada has taken advantage of the U.S., they have ripped us off for years and now we are turning the tables.

CORDES: At Detroit Axle in Michigan, the CEO says the cross-border tit-for-tat is already driving up his costs.

MIKE MUSEINESH: I’ve imported a million dollars worth of product, once upon a time we paid the government $25,000 in tariffs. Now it went up to $725,000 in tariffs. Overnight.

CORDES: Canada is America’s second-largest trading partner and their economies are closely intertwined. On Sunday, Trump posted a cartoon image of himself checking Canada’s prime minister with a hockey stick. And he threatened to ban the sale of Canadian Bombardier business jets. Bombardier pointed out that the company works with 2800 U.S. suppliers and makes its wings in Texas, flight control components in California. It buys engines from Arizona and communications equipment from Iowa. 

A Kansas Republican, Senator Jerry Moran, even reached out to The White House to make sure that Trump knows Bombardier supports more than 1000 jobs in Wichita. It’s yet another sign, Tony, that Trump’s party may not share his appetite for another trade war, especially in an election year.

DOKOUPIL: That is true, Nancy. Thank you very much.

NBC didn’t even bother with a report. Meanwhile, the public continues to get less than half the story of the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and Canada. 

The Elitist Media are making sure that this continues to be the case, even if it means suppressing Canada’s military rapprochement with America’s main geostrategic rival.


Seattle Police Chief Calls Shooters “Trigger Pullers”– www.louderwithcrowder.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

Even if we must be politically correct to those committing crimes, which we certainly should not be, why can’t the left make an exception for shooters who disregard human life? Because, in whatever pursuit that is, Interim Seattle Police Chief Andre Sayles has renamed shooters “trigger pullers” because of BLM or whatever.

This is objectively stupid and even more proof that the left prioritizes the feelings of criminals, including the ones who disregard the value of human life, over public safety. There should be more outrage over this.

According to Fox 13:

A violent 24-hour stretch in Seattle left three people dead and three others injured following three separate shooting incidents in and around the Belltown neighborhood.

Addressing potential staffing strains, Sayles said, “That’s something I have to look at. I haven’t really dove into what the staffing numbers looked like and if that was the case, then we will do what we need to do as a department to make sure that they are not overwhelmed.”

What a foolish response. It is his job to know the staffing numbers. He cannot even be bothered to do the bare minimum. What a disgrace this man is.

“We have officers in these dedicated areas. They’re a block or two away, and it’s one of those incidents where we respond to violence on a daily basis,” Sayles said. “It’s not like we can be there and stop it. But our goal is to be there and stop it.”

Maybe one day people like Sayles will fight for public safety the way he does for the feelings of evil losers, but until then, this is the best he can do. To call this a slap in the face to law-abiding Americans does not even begin to describe this absurdity.

– YouTube www.youtube.com


Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Accidentally Admit They Made Their Decision Based on the Wrong Criteria– www.westernjournal.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

After Friday’s mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, three jurors have come forward revealing how they saw the outcome — and their perspective is just as bad as you would imagine.

Clancy was on trial for the deaths of her three children in January 2023. Her defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, argued she should not be held criminally responsible due to postpartum depression and psychosis. A mistrial was declared after one juror held out against the rest, refusing to retreat from the charges against her.

Now, we’re hearing from three women who saw it differently and gave an interview to WBTS — Paula Devlin, Roni Carlson, and Kellie Farina.

Their comments showed they were completely clueless and favored Clancy for reasons that had nothing to do with the law.

WBTS posted the interview to YouTube on Tuesday. Farina called the prosecution’s opening statement “harsh,” and said she did not like that they did not present character witnesses for Clancy. “You’re presenting all these medical professionals, but nobody’s presenting for the prosecution, a woman, a mother of three children.”

“I found it to be biased right out of the gate.”

Should Lindsay Clancy have been convicted of murder?

Why would the prosecution need to talk about her character?

Reddington admitted she killed three children. Would talking about her role as a mother before killing three children completely excuse that completely evil act?

What does “bias” have to do with anything? They are the prosecution. They are trying to prove she murdered her children.

“There is no compassion in this courtroom right now,” Farina recalled, apparently forgetting that compassion was not shown to the children Clancy killed.

When Devlin was asked if the prosecution said anything she considered in her decision, she gave a blunt “no.”

Related:

A Lindsay Clancy-Inspired Murder? Hours Before Boy, 2, Was Found Hanging from Rafter, Mom Was Discussing Clancy Online: Court Docs

On the other side, all three women could not stop swooning over Reddington. It was not because of the legality of his defense. They just seemed to like him.

Carlson recalled laughing at Reddington, saying his demeanor was “funny,” adding that “he was entertaining, which was good because we needed some of that.”

Devlin noted he was both “arrogant and entertaining,” before Farina added “but compassionate,” to which Devlin agreed.

“His compassion toward Lindsay was amazing,” she added.

Again, none of this should have anything to do with a murder trial and the facts presented.

It is clear these women went off of their emotions and were ready to let a child killer go free.

All three of them should be embarrassed to admit these things.

It is further proof that the one holdout juror was possibly the only sane voice during deliberations.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Tags:

, , , , , , , , , , ,


Nancy Pelosi Disclosed a Multi-Million Dollar AI Investment Just Weeks Before the Stock Blew Up– www.westernjournal.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi disclosed a multimillion-dollar investment last month in an artificial intelligence company whose stocks exploded in value soon after.

Pelosi’s husband Paul invested in Bloom Energy, a California-based company that provides fuel-cell technology and power systems aimed at meeting the enormous electricity demands of AI data centers.

According to a financial transaction report Pelosi signed Aug. 21, her household made several Bloom Energy purchases in late July.

The transactions included 10,000 shares purchased July 24, along with 100 call options, according to reporting from the New York Post. Another 5,000 shares and 100 additional call options were purchased July 28.

The disclosed value ranges put the combined transactions at a minimum of roughly $3 million, although the actual amount could have been as much as $12 million, because congressional financial disclosure forms use broad dollar ranges.

The July 24 purchases came after Bloom Energy’s stock had suffered a significant decline.

Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from buying and selling stocks?

Then came July 28.

That was the same day Bloom Energy reported extremely strong earnings, with annual revenue growth of 165 percent, according to the Post.

Bloom Energy’s stock subsequently took off.

Then, on Sept. 4, another major development arrived: Bloom Energy was announced as a new addition to the S&P 500.

The company is scheduled to join the benchmark index Sept. 21, alongside Everpure and Illumina.

Bloom Energy shares surged following the announcement, with the stock gaining nearly 40 percent over a five-day period, according to the Post.

Related:

Nancy Pelosi Is Attempting to Sabotage the Front-Runner to Replace Her in Congress: Report

By Tuesday, Bloom Energy shares were trading around $282.50, compared with $184.89 on July 24, the day of the first Pelosi household purchase.

That’s a striking move in a matter of weeks.

And it makes the timing of the disclosure noteworthy.

Pelosi’s office has said the former speaker does not own stocks and had no knowledge of or subsequent involvement in the transactions.

The trades were made by her husband and reported through the congressional disclosure system as transactions involving a spouse.

In an article about the transactions, financial writer Rich Duprey of 24/7 Wall Street  dubbed Pelosi “the queen of capital gains.”

“Pelosi’s trading record in Congress has consistently outpaced the S&P 500 and even Warren Buffett over comparable stretches, fueling suspicion that lawmakers with committee-level oversight enjoy an informational edge,” Duprey observed.

The New York Post said Pelosi “has faced heated blowback for her family’s trading activity — racking up a 65% return on her portfolio in 2023 while her venture capitalist husband made $38 million worth of stock trades in the weeks leading up to President Trump’s inauguration.”

Duprey noted that multiple bills to ban stock trading by members of Congress have been introduced, but they’ve all stalled.

The Democratic former House Speaker’s trades have been so notable that in 2023, GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced one such bill that he dubbed the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act – or the PELOSI Act.

Hawley later met with Democrats and agreed to change the name of the bill to the HONEST Act — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions — which allowed enough Democratic support to advance the bill out of committee in July 2025.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.


Ending Discrimination Against Stay-At-Home Moms Is Not ‘Welfare’– thefederalist.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Family and children are and have always been the cornerstone of conservatism. The moment the New York Times publicized the Trump team’s plan to make stay at home mothers eligible for childcare payments, however, another GOP feud was born.

The lines were immediately clear. The same folks that find any excuse to complain about Vice President J.D. Vance as the face of the “woke right” are taking aim at a proposal that would make certain single income households helmed by married parents eligible for childcare subsidies typically handed to daycares.

The current eligibility structure of the 30-year-old Child Care and Development Fund program is flawed and, like most welfare programs, susceptible to exploitation by fraudsters and moochers. The $12 billion in taxes the daycare program spends on subsidizing unmarried working mothers incentivizes out of wedlock births and outsourcing parenting duties, both inherently anti-conservative behaviors.

Under the Trump administration’s proposal, “parent-based child care” in a home supported by a spouse who “works at least 35 hours per week” and meets the same income qualifications as current recipients would be recognized as a legitimate cause worthy of tax dollars.

The proposed reform, which can’t be implemented without a comment period and until at least next year, does not expand the CCDF or demand more taxation. It simply redirects already-allocated funds, which Trump’s HHS tried to scale back, to better align government spending with the Trump administration’s pro-family goals and not discriminate against families with married parents on a single income.

A small sliver of stay-at-home parents would actually qualify for the payout, but the knee-jerk reaction from the think tank right was to vilify those who want to raise their own babies as “welfare queens” and “socialist.” They claim they shouldn’t have their hard-earned money “stolen” and handed to women who don’t “organize their lives so that they can work from home or provide for their families in a flexible manner.”

The debate quickly shifted from those spending complaints to claims that moms and dads both having to work is actually a good thing and it’s okay that tax dollars are currently used to subsidize that corporate framework.

In an ideal world, the government axes the welfare program altogether and instead offers families with a stay-at-home mother a $9000 tax break. But that’s not on the table. The chances that Republicans will further risk re-election to go after the “social safety net” are low and contra to history. As I type, our GOP-controlled Congress sits in recess. This scheduled break comes just a few months before the midterms and after two years of legislators largely failing to move the needle in favor of the conservative voters who elected them.

Pretending that Trump can put the CCDF on the chopping block tomorrow is a false dilemma that completely ignores the willingness and “power of the purse.” The people arguing such are not simply being intellectually dishonest, they are further proving why conservatives have so much ground to make up in the first place.

The welfare state is a scourge, but it’s not going away anytime soon. Which is exactly why we have to harness it or risk losing it yet another very important cultural battlefield to the left. In the wild world of welfare, financially compensating married stay-at-home moms is the lesser of tax-funded evils. In fact, despite what the nasties online suggest, it’s not an evil at all.

Data shows that while “one-earner families (whether the breadwinner is male or female) have fallen economically behind,” having a stay-at-home mom is good for the development and well-being of both younger and older kids and boosts America’s already-tumbling birth rate.

Data showing the differences in outcomes between children of working moms and stay-at-home moms is hard to find, we do know that homeschooled children, whose education requires an at-home parent (mostly mom), are “healthier, happier, more virtuous” and less likely to engage in unsavory behaviors like illicit drugs, lying, and gambling than their conventionally schooled peers.

The facts is, children are better off if they are intentionally raised by their parents instead of a daycare, a nanny, and a government school. That’s a hard thing for some people, especially women, to hear. After all, many conservative females have bought the feminist-fueled lie that they can have a career and more even though data shows they are happier concentrating prioritizing marriage and kids.

While American families with stay-at-home moms are the minority, that isn’t because women want to be in the workforce; it’s because they have to be. According to a 2015 Gallup poll, a majority of mothers, 56 percent, would prefer to be full-time “homemakers” instead of full-time employees. The working mothers who could find a way leave their jobs over the last few years did so in significant swaths.

In the words of C.S. Lewis, “Children are not a distraction from more important work. They are the most important work.” Family is the foundation of civilization. The CCDF as is doesn’t simply pose a threat to the security and stability offered by married parents, it encourages the opposite. Something has to give and it we can’t let it be the foundation.

If Wall Street Republicans have made anything clear over the last couple months, it’s that GDP is God and funneling tax dollars to separate children from their mothers is a good thing. The recent infighting was never about $20 burritos and cutting stay-at-home moms a meager check that would otherwise go to subsidizing single motherhood. It’s about the battle between living out conservative values and accepting the cultural lies we’ve been sold as truth.


Jordan Boyd is an award-winning staff writer at The Federalist and producer of “The Federalist Radio Hour.” Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.


Ukrainian army carries out 53 attacks on DPR in past day, kills civilian – Military & Defense– tass.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

DONETSK, September 9. /TASS/. The Ukrainian military carried out 53 attacks on the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) over the past day, killing one civilian and injuring 13 others, the regional government’s department for recording Ukraine’s war crimes said in a statement.

“Fifty-three attacks by the Ukrainian armed forces were recorded. One civilian was reported dead, and 13 others were injured,” the statement reads.

The attacks damaged five residential buildings, several diesel locomotives and cars, as well as public transport vehicles and trucks, and six civilian infrastructure facilities.

In addition, the department also received further information about two civilians killed and seven injured on August 25, September 4 and 7.


Elitist Media: Are We Going to ‘Survive’ Destructive Donald Trump?– www.newsbusters.org
News Source

EXCERPT:

As the midterm elections get closer, the elitist media is turning up their hate machine to stoke their audiences into an anti-Trump frenzy. 

MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough fearmongered that President Donald Trump was tearing down institutions “brick by brick” that keep Americans safe as he questioned: “Are we gonna survive?” 

Scarborough’s MS NOW partner Mika Brzezinski claimed that Trump’s ICE agents were Nazi “shock troops” that are gunning down Americans.  

This past month also saw podcaster Jennifer Welch agitate against Trump and his supporters: “They are dismantling our country. They are opening up concentration camps in the United States of America.” 

MS NOW and PBS contributor Jonathan Capehart gloomily warned: “Trump is determined to destroy what makes America great.” 

The leftist elitists in the entertainment industry took potshots too. Comedian Rosie O’Donnell (who fled to Ireland to escape Trump) returned to guest-host ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!. She used that show’s opening monologue to attack the President for bringing “fascism and the measles” back.  

ABC’s The View co-host Whoopi Goldberg urged her anti-Trump audience to vote in the midterms because: “Our lives literally depend on this.” 

The following are the most obnoxious outbursts from leftist journalists and celebrities over the last month:

 

Joe Scarborough: Are We Going to “Survive” Trump and His Nazi “Shock Troops?”

 

 

“You see what’s happened at the DOD. You see what’s happened at the Justice Department. You see what’s happened at the National Institutes of Health. All of these, all of these institutions that have been built up to protect Americans and to extend American power and safety across the globe – being torn down brick by brick, piece by piece, by this Trump Administration. And the question people have is, are we gonna survive?”
— Co-host Joe Scarborough on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 24.

 

 

“You’re actually going to use shock troops in the United States of America to go after not only people who are immigrants, but also Americans themselves. Time and time again, Americans are getting caught up in this, getting gunned down in the streets of America. And you look at Hispanics….They’re having to carry their papers now….This is what happened in the Soviet Union. This is what happened in Nazi Germany.” 
— Co-host Joe Scarborough on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 13.  

 

Mika Brzezinski Attacks “Backwards, Un-American” and “Sick” Trump Immigration Policy

 

 

“Are, again, we going after the worst of the worst, or are we just going after people to create a level of fear out there where laws can be broken, people can be detained for months, and children have to show up alone for the detention hearings? The list goes on as to how backwards, un-American, and sick this is.”
— Co-host Mika Brzezinski on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 25.

 

Jim Acosta Claims Ambassadors Keep Telling Him That Trump Era Reminds Them of 1930s Germany 

 

 

“I was at a diplomatic function. I had an ambassador to one of our allies in Europe,come up to me and say, ‘What’s happening right now, Jim, reminds me of Germany in the 1930s.’ And there was another ambassador from another U.S. ally standing next to this ambassador, and that ambassador nodded, yep, yep, and they were both saying the same thing.”
— Former CNN correspondent Jim Acosta on The Jim Acosta Show podcast, August 29.

 

Chris Matthews: Trump’s Not Hitler, He’s Mussolini 

 

 

“We can’t accuse anybody of being Hitler because there’s only one Hitler, fortunately. There’s only one guy that killed all the people and created a war that cost the lives of 50 million people. And not just the holocaust; that war everywhere. But I think he [Donald Trump] is Mussolini. I think he loves being – having big tributes, pretty uniforms, monuments to himself.”
— Former MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews on MS NOW’s Alex Witt Reports, August 29.

 

Kristen Welker Runs Interference for Leftist Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed 

 

 

“Let me ask you, you describe Dr. El-Sayed as extreme; your Senate colleague Tommy Tuberville has called him a terrorist. Senator Ted Cruz said El-Sayed wants, quote, Sharia law. To be fair, there’s no evidence to support those claims. Do you believe those attacks go too far, Senator?”
— Moderator Kristen Welker to Sen. Jim Banks on NBC’s Meet the Press, August 9.

 

 

“There is no evidence that [Abdul] El-Sayed supports any terrorist organization. I just want to read this. A Washington Post analysis online found that, quote, ‘nearly one in three posts about El-Sayed from right-wing figures mentioned Islam, Muslims, or sharia.’ Are Republicans trying to scare voters based on the fact that El-Sayed would be the first Muslim senator?”
— Moderator Kristen Welker to Sen. Tim Scott on NBC’s Meet the Press, August 23.

 

CNN’s Audie Cornish: “A Colin Powell” Wouldn’t Be Able to Rise in Pete Hegseth’s Military

 

 

“There’s something about calling it a meritocracy and then going around saying, ‘Based on your looks, vibes, your identity, you’re out.’ And I think that’s been very disturbing to see, certainly as a black American watching the history of your, the military being whitewashed, when so many people in the community actually were educated, mobilized, and came up through the U.S. military. I don’t think I would look at this military today and be able to say the same thing. I don’t think a Colin Powell rises in this military.”
— Host Audie Cornish after playing a montage clip of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, as aired on CNN This Morning, September 3. 

 

Jonathan Capehart: “Donald Trump is Determined to Destroy What Makes America Great”

 

 

“Donald Trump is determined to destroy what makes America great: our democracy, our pluralism, and the educational and cultural institutions that thrive when people can freely express themselves without fear. His fight against the Smithsonian Institution is escalating because of what Reuters describes as, quote, Trump’s ‘displeasure with what he called the institution’s excessive focus on how bad slavery was.’…The Smithsonian relies heavily on federal support, which means it’s vulnerable to the whims of a man who made history as the first convicted criminal to be elected president and let that cook for a moment.”
— Substitute host Jonathan Capehart on MS NOW’s The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, September 4.

 

Republicans Set a “Health Care Bomb” On the American People 

 

 

Anchor Geoff Bennett: “Jonathan, what are Democrats offering voters and what would they do if they win the midterms?”
Contributor Jonathan Capehart: “Democrats have been talking about affordability since, what is this, ’26, 20 – since this time last year. I believe it was last year, maybe it was ’24, but preparing people for the health care bomb that Republicans were about to set on the American people.”
— PBS News Hour, September 4.

 

Karoline Leavitt Became the “Most Shameless Liar” That Trump Has Ever Had as Press Secretary

 

 

 “Kayleigh McEnany, she was going for the Gold in the Lie Olympics but – and I thought coming into this second term, when they announced Karoline Leavitt as the new White House press secretary, I thought – you know – I don’t know – is she ready for primetime? She’s gonna have to do those special exercises that they do inside the Trump White House to really hone their skills at lying to the American people. But by golly, she put in the work. And she has, she has shown some results! She is, I think, by far the biggest and most effective and most shameless liar that Donald Trump has ever had as White House press secretary.” 
— Former CNN correspondent Jim Acosta on his podcast The Jim Acosta Show, August 12. 

 

Gayle King to Hillary Clinton on Leftist Icon Gloria Steinem: I Was In Awe of Her

 

 

“I woke up to this news. I just heard it an hour ago, and I felt like I’d been kicked in the stomach. I wonder if you could share your remembrances about Gloria Steinem….It is something, Madam Secretary, when you meet your heroes, and they’re everything that you think that they would be, I was in awe the first time I met her.” 
— Co-host Gayle King to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on CBS Mornings, September 3.

 

Peter Alexander Gushes About Steinem to Nancy Pelosi: You Two Advanced Equal Rights, Despite Having to Fight Through Three Republican Presidents!

 

 

 “You and Miss [Gloria] Steinem fought through three Republican presidencies to advance not just women’s rights, but equal rights for everyone.”
— Host Peter Alexander to Rep. Nancy Pelosi on MS NOW’s State of Play, September 3. 

 

NY Times Lavished Praise on Leftist Gloria Steinem, Savaged Conservative Phyllis Schlafly 

“Gloria Steinem, the feminist crusader who, in galvanizing the modern women’s movement, helped millions of women develop a sense of self-worth and gain a measure of equality at home, at work and in society at large, died on Wednesday at her home in New York City.”
— New York Times Obituary writer Katharine Q. Seelye in September 3, 2026 obit of Gloria Steinem.

VS.

“In her time, Mrs. [Phyllis] Schlafly was one of the most polarizing figures in American public life, a self-described housewife who displayed a moral ferocity reminiscent of the ax-wielding prohibitionist Carry Nation.”
— New York Times Obituary writer Douglas Martin in September 5, 2016 obit of Phyllis Schlafly. 

 

Jennifer Welch: Trump and His Supporters Are “Dismantling Our Country,” “Opening Up Concentration Camps”

 

 

“You should hold no punches in critiquing Donald Trump and all of the people in this country. You should critique the 77 million people that voted for him. You should go full tilt because it’s dark; it’s awful. They are dismantling our country. They are opening up concentration camps in the United States of America.”
— Former reality show star Jennifer Welch on her I’ve Had It podcast, August 31.

 

MAGA Can Only Offer “Fear-Mongering, Scare-Mongering, Xenophobia and Racism”

 

 

“There is nothing radical about not taking corporate money. There is nothing radical about wanting health care for everybody. There is nothing radical about having a politics that is more empathetic, inclusive, and accepting. MAGA is none of those things. The only thing they can offer, the American public right now, is fear-mongering, scare-mongering, xenophobia, and racism, and Islamophobia, and it has worked for a very long time since 9/11.”|
— Host Jennifer Welch on the I’ve Had It podcast, September 1.

 

Whoopi Pushes The View’s Anti-Trump Audience to Vote: “Our Lives Literally Depend On This” 

 

 

“This is now on all of us, every one of us, doesn’t matter your color, doesn’t matter your sex, you want it to change, you’re the only one that can do it….Find out where you can vote and help your elders get to the places to vote. Help everybody you can to get out this vote because our lives literally depend on this.”
— Co-host Whoopi Goldberg on ABC’s The View, September 8. 

 

Rosie O’Donnell Fled to Ireland Because She Thought About “All the People in Nazi Germany Who Didn’t Get Out Early Enough”

 

 

“When I told my friends, they’re like, ‘We can’t get you to go to Cancun. What do you mean you’re moving to Ireland?’ And so, you know, I was sure after I read that book, I thought about all the people in Nazi Germany who didn’t get out early enough. And I thought, I don’t want that to be my truth. And I also don’t want to be engrossed in every detail of what he’s [Donald Trump] saying and doing every moment, which is what happens when you’re here in the United States.”
— Former ABC’s The View co-host and comedian Rosie O’Donnell on The Tangle with Kyle Ridley podcast, August 11.

 

Rosie: Trump Brought Me Back, Just like the Measles and Fascism 

 

 

“This has been kind of a strange experience for me, because all of a sudden I’m re-famous. I’m back in the spotlight all thanks to President Oompa J. Loompa, who is watching us this evening from inside a catering cart. You know, I couldn’t have done it without you, sweetie. You brought me back, just like you did with fascism and the measles.”
— Comedian and former ABC’s The View co-host Rosie O’Donnell guest-hosting on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!, August 18.

 

HBO Host John Oliver: Reagan Was a “Messy Bitch,” the “Forrest Gump of Societal Ills”

 

 

Host John Oliver: “Let’s start with the fact that the basic concept of a fetus being its own person with distinct rights is nothing new — in fact, here’s one of its major proponents, laying out the argument in 1984.”
Clip of Ronald Reagan: “I believe that until and unless someone can establish that the unborn child is not a living human being, then that child is already protected by the Constitution, which guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to all of us.”
Oliver: “Yeah! There he is! It seems you cannot trace the source of any modern problem without a cameo from this messy bitch. He truly is the Forrest Gump of societal…


JUST IN: Lindsay Clancy Juror Makes Shocking Admission: ‘I Thought She Was Guilty’– trendingpoliticsnews.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

A juror who ultimately voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy has revealed she originally believed the Massachusetts mother was guilty and criminally responsible for killing her three young children.

The anonymous woman, identified by CBS Boston as juror No. 5, said her opinion changed during contentious deliberations that ended with an 11-1 deadlock and a mistrial last week.

The juror said she knew little about the nationally followed case before being selected because she does not regularly watch the news.

She entered deliberations leaning toward conviction.

‘Originally, I felt that she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it.’

Even after voting to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity, the juror acknowledged that she remains conflicted about the case.

‘Maybe I still believe that Clancy is guilty, in a certain way,’ she admitted.

Clancy, 36, is charged with killing her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.

She admitted strangling the children with exercise bands but pleaded not guilty, with her defense arguing that postpartum psychosis left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.

Prosecutors maintained that Clancy was criminally responsible and deliberately carried out the killings.

The anonymous juror said the evidence initially left her inclined to side with prosecutors, particularly the harrowing 911 call made by Clancy’s husband, Patrick, after discovering the children.

‘I will never be the same after that 911 call,’ the juror said.

The recording was played for jurors but has not been publicly released.

She also pushed back against online conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy of killing the children and framing his wife.

‘If these people could have heard that visceral, blood-curdling scream,’ she said. ‘It was horrifying.’

But her assessment of Lindsay Clancy‘s criminal responsibility shifted as jurors reviewed the evidence and debated her mental condition.

RELATED: NEW: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Their Silence In Interview After Mistrial

‘I think this was a woman who was not mentally healthy, she was in the throes of a significant mental crisis,’ the juror said.

‘I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out, and this was the only option.’

She eventually concluded that prosecutors had not eliminated enough doubt for her to convict.

‘There was not a single moment throughout that presentation of that case that you could say, ‘Oh yep, 100 percent I’m certain she did it,” she recalled. ‘There is too much gray area.’

The juror also offered a dramatically different view of the lone holdout who prevented an acquittal.

Three other jurors who spoke publicly this week criticized the unidentified man for refusing to change his vote, but juror No. 5 said he was not the only person in the room who had dug in.

RELATED: Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Sends Jaw-Dropping Message To Trump

‘This standalone juror was not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side, so I’m going to kind of defend that individual,’ she said.

‘There were some big personalities in that room, but at the end of the day, I feel like it just came down to an inability to move past your convictions.’

She said other jurors began trying to persuade the holdout early in the deliberations, with tensions eventually growing intense enough that arguments could reportedly be heard outside the jury room.

Foreperson Roni Carlson and jurors Kellie Farina and Paula Devlin have separately said the holdout acknowledged having reasonable doubt but still refused to return a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict.

Carlson recalled becoming optimistic that the jury had finally reached an agreement before the man again refused to acquit.

‘but I’m still not going to say she’s not guilty,’ Carlson recalled.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial Sept. 4 after more than a week of deliberations failed to produce a unanimous verdict.

The latest juror interview now reveals that the final 11-1 split did not necessarily reflect where every juror began. At least one woman who ultimately sided with Clancy entered the jury room believing she was guilty before changing her position after reviewing the case with the other jurors.

POLL: Do You Believe Transgenderism Is A Mental Illness?


WATCH: Families Plead for Mamdani to Stay Away from 9/11 Memorial After He Says He’ll Attend Event Despite Their Wishes: “He’s Serving Himself”– www.thegatewaypundit.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Giovanni Galante, who lost his wife Grace on 9/11, tells Zohran Mamdani, “We really want us to be left alone”

Families of the victims of 9/11 gathered on Tuesday in Manhattan to send a clear message to New York Mayor , telling him to stay away from their 9/11 memorial service. 

As Mamdani plans to defy the families’ wishes, Giovanni Galante, the organizer of a petition to bar Mamdani from the event, said they just want “to be left alone” to mourn the 25th anniversary of their losses.

“He just wants to be there because he wants to be there,” said Charles Wolf, noting that “This mayor is not serving us; he’s serving himself.”

The petition, launched by families of the victims and signed by over 100,000 people, describes the event as “not simply a public ceremony,” but “a deeply personal day of mourning.”

“The presence of individuals whose words or associations are perceived as conflicting with the solemn purpose of the event risks detracting from that focus and causing additional pain,” it reads, giving examples of why sympathizer Mamdani is not welcome.

Concerns have been raised about Mr. Mamdani’s public positions, associations, and responses to rhetoric that many perceive as hostile to these shared values. These include:

  •           A perceived reluctance to clearly and unequivocally condemn phrases such as “globalize the intifada,” which many interpret as endorsing or normalizing violence.
  •           Support for, or associations with, individuals whose public statements or records are viewed by concerned family members as dismissive of American institutions or insufficiently critical of extremist ideologies.
  •           Mr. Mamdani’s own father, whom he has acknowledged as having shaped his views, penned a book shortly after 9/11 in which he argued that suicide bombers should be “understood as a feature of modern political violence rather than stigmatized as a mark of barbarism.” He also argued that there was a moral equivalence between the and al-Qaeda.
  •           Mr. Mamdani has praised Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who has been linked to radical Islam, was named as an alleged co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and served as a character witness for the “Blind Sheikh,” who was convicted in 1995 of plotting terror attacks against the United States.
  •            Mr. Mamdani has blamed the United States for radicalizing Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaeda propagandist linked to the 9/11 hijackers. Critics have likened this to blaming victims rather than perpetrators.
  •           Mr. Mamdani appointed Ramzi Kassem, who previously represented Ahmed al-Darbi (convicted in an al-Qaeda tanker bombing plot), as New York City’s chief counsel.
  •           Mr. Mamdani has endorsed candidates such as Aber Kawas, who described 9/11 as an attack “a couple of people did in the context of U.S. capitalism, racism, white supremacy, and Islamophobia,” and who also expressed sympathy for Ahmed Ferhani, who pleaded guilty to plotting to blow up a Manhattan synagogue.
  •           Mr. Mamdani recently stood with DSA primary winner Darializa Aria Chevalier, who once tweeted, “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me.”

Still, Mamdani declared that he will “proudly honor the families, the survivors, the first responders, forever impacted by that horrific terror attack by standing alongside them at this year’s 9/11 commemoration,” the Gateway Pundit reported.

On Tuesday, family members, first responders, and elected officials made their final pleas for the mayor not to attend.

Giovanni Galante, who lost his wife Grace in the terrorist attack and organized the petition, said at the press conference, “I’m here to honor my beautiful wife and to have this man not attend our service. The main purpose is just that we don’t believe in what he believes in, and we really want us to be left alone.”

“The purpose of this whole thing, this 25th anniversary, is for our, you know, victims and us survivors to blend in and pray that day for all the families, not have a circus around us,” he said.

Monica Iken, who lost her husband, Michael, stated, “It’s a blessing that we can go to this memorial and honor our loved ones and not just their death. So that’s a very important thing.”

“I support the families. I feel like if the families really feel, if we feel, that we don’t want someone at our world-class memorial museum that’s sacred and hallowed, we feel that that person should respect our wishes,” Iken said.

She further noted that Mamdani “wasn’t even here” during 9/11/2001. “He was 10, he wasn’t in this country, and I think he should really respect us,” she added. “Just let us have our peace, our memorial, to really understand why we’re here. We’re honoring our loved ones.”

“I want to make clear that our petition is not about Mayor Mamdani’s religion or where he came from. It is strictly about the policies that he has today,” said Cheri Sparacio, the wife of 9/11 victim Tom Sparacio. She then pointed to Mamdani’s support for Hasan Piker, who said America deserved 9/11, and his hiring of Ramzi Kassem, who once represented Ahmed al-Darbi, an al-Qaeda operative convicted in the 2002 bombing of a French oil tanker and the brother-in-law of 9/11 Pentagon hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar.

“Yes, he was a nine-year-old boy when 9/11 happened, but it is today that he stands with people like Hasan Piker. It is today that he hires people like Ramzi Kassem. It is today that he stands with an imam that was a co-conspirator of the 93 bombing. That is what we object to,” she said.

Jeannette Puccio-Pick, whose father was killed in the attack when she was nine years old, put it simply, saying, “My message to Mayor Mamdani is: Dude, we don’t want you to come.”

“We don’t want a mayor who only wants to be there for the publicity. This mayor is not serving us; he’s serving himself. We are asking, respectfully, that he not show up,” said Charles Wolf, whose wife, Katherine, was killed while working in the North Tower on 9/11.

“Even though there is going to be other politicians there, these are the politicians that helped us, pushed beneficial laws through, and literally held our hand during that time. Mayor Mamdani has not shown any of that, none of it. He just wants to be there because he wants to be there. So, we are asking him to respect the fact that trauma is revived during the ceremony. It is a private ceremony. It is not a public ceremony. Mayor Mamdani, please do not come.”

WATCH:

After the speeches, the reporters present had no questions for the families. There was no way for them to defend Mamdani.

Fox’s Harris Faulkner was in disbelief at the press’s refusal.

WATCH:

Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.


Los Angeles Is Flooded With Government-Funded Non-Profits– thefederalist.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Massive sums of money, washing into an endless system of creeks and gullies, diffusing and disappearing.

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, a county-city joint powers authority that has been largely abandoned by county officials over serious concerns about effectiveness, financial transparency, and basic operational competence, proudly says that it funds “more than 100 nonprofit partner agencies” in a single county.

To begin to understand what that giant system of non-profit corporations looks like in practice, look closely at a single example: Special Service for Groups (SSG). The Charity Navigator website describes SSG as an entity that performs a remarkably broad cluster of roles: “Provide behavioral health, support for older adults, social justice/anti hate, HIV/AIDS related, an extensive array of homeless, substance abuse and health access initiatives and services to vulnerable communities.”

Many divisions with different purposes live under SSG’s corporate umbrella. The Asian and Pacific Islander Forward Movement (APIFM) works within that local population on “community health and environmental justice issues,” for example, while Access to Prevention Advocacy Intervention & Treatment (APAIT) provides advocacy, education, and health services to “people at-risk for or living with HIV/AIDS.”

You can read about APAIT’s Trans Pride Gala here, as an example of their publicly funded work, and see a complete list of SSG’s divisions on the main SSG website (where they scroll across a banner near the top).

But SSG is becoming particularly important in homeless services, and is broadly funded as a homeless services agency. More about those details in a moment.

After its function, the next thing to understand about SSG is where the money comes from. In fiscal year 2025, which ended in June of that year, the organization had a little more than $264 million in revenue. You can find that number in their Form 990, the financial disclosure document a non-profit corporation has to file annually with the IRS. But if you open that document, keep scrolling down until you get to the sources of that cash. It’s on pg. 9, the “statement of revenue.” Screenshot:

Of $264 million in annual revenue, about $260 million comes from government grants, or about 98.5 percent of SSG’s total funding. As their audited financial statements show, about $60 million of that public funding comes in the form of federal grants, much of which has been “passed through” to SSG through state and local governments.

So in practice, SSG is a government agency without really being one, providing government-funded services as a private corporation that has no obligation to comply with transparency laws like the California Public Records Act or the state’s open meeting law for local governments. They spend public money under corporate transparency rules: private enterprise with government funds.

Still, SSG has some financial disclosure requirements as a non-profit corporation, and we can see on their Form 990 what they pay their top employees:

In its current form, SSG was created in September of 1993, from the bones of an older non-profit and a set of “restated” articles of incorporation.

You can scroll through twenty-five years of SSG’s financial history at ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer website. It’s a story of growth, then of rapid growth: In 2006, about $23 million in government grants (and $26 million overall); in 2016, about $53 million in government grants; and then, in 2019, after the Measure H sales tax increases for homeless services passed in 2017, a big jump to about $108 million in government grants.

Finally, as Los Angeles County voters passed the larger Measure A sales tax increase for homeless services in 2024, SSG’s annual revenue jumped in a single year by more than $50 million. You can go see that big jump for yourself, comparing fiscal year 2024 to fiscal year 2025 on the Nonprofit Explorer page for SSG. Also compare fiscal year 2023 to 2024, because they added almost $100 million in annual revenue in just three explosive years:

Around $167 million to $264 million, as a non-profit that had $26 million in revenue just 10 years ago.

As SSG has pushed more aggressively into the broad funding and delivery of homeless services, where a lot of public funding is available, its record has suggested that the non-profit may be growing beyond its expertise. With close to $8.5 million in city, state, and foundation funding, SSG now owns a former motel in South Los Angeles that it plans to convert into supportive housing for the homeless. Six years after the City of Los Angeles bought that property and passed it to SSG, a motel that was in operation and hosting guests when it was taken over now looks like this:

City officials have given SSG a few more years to find additional funding to begin the project, but for now a working motel has been turned into a stripped and gutted property with a security fence around it.

More controversially, SSG had a significant financial partnership for years with a Los Angeles businessman named Alexander Soofer, who is now awaiting trial in state and federal courts on a long list of fraud charges. Prosecutors allege that Soofer diverted $10 million in public funding that was intended for homeless services to his personal accounts, using the money to fund luxury travel and a $7 million house.

An interesting wrinkle in Soofer’s prosecution recently appeared in reporting from the Los Angeles news organization LAist, which pointed out for the first time that Soofer had two corporations with similar names: Abundant Blessings, a non-profit, and Abundant Blessings from Above, a for-profit corporation. Both LAHSA and SSG paid both of Soofer’s corporations with public funds to provide services like transitional housing to the homeless, but they don’t appear to have noticed that Soofer was using his for-profit corporation to collect homeless services funds. You can see this detail in SSG’s Form 990, for several years in a row. Here’s the most recent example, from the 2025 form:

For several years, SSG reported to the IRS that it was providing passed-through public funds to Abundant Blessings from Above, a 501(c)(3). But that was never true:

Distributing millions of dollars a year in public funds, they appear to have had no idea who they were paying.

The Federalist made a significant effort to discuss SSG’s use of public funds with SSG and LAHSA (which provides funding to SSG). The news media contact listed on SSG’s website, an executive at a private public relations firm, didn’t respond to messages, and an email message sent to SSG Executive Director Herbert Hatanaka was blocked by SSG’s email system. Finally, a reporter from The Federalist tried to visit SSG headquarters in person, but was denied access to the office.

LAHSA alone funds “more than 100 nonprofit partner agencies” in Los Angeles County. There’s one, with $260 million in annual taxpayer funding from all government sources, an emptied and gutted motel, and one of their major financial partners awaiting trial.



Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump Discussed Potential Trilateral Meeting With Xi Jinping: Kremlin– www.ndtv.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump discussed the idea of holding a trilateral meeting with China’s Xi Jinping at an upcoming summit in November, the Kremlin said Wednesday.

The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is scheduled to hold a summit in the Chinese city of Shenzhen between November 18-19.

Russia has indicated Putin will attend, although the White House has not yet announced whether Trump will be there.

Asked whether Trump and Putin discussed the idea of a trilateral meeting in Shenzhen during their phone call on Tuesday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “Undoubtedly.”

“This potential possibility has been mentioned before, and there will be such an opportunity,” Peskov told reporters, including AFP.

APEC is an intergovernmental forum that dates to the 1980s.

The group, which includes Russia, China and the United States, is among the most important forums for economic cooperation in the Asia Pacific.

The November summit comes as Washington pushes Russia for an end to the Ukraine war, and amid deepening ties between Moscow and Beijing.

US envoys visited both Moscow and Kyiv last week, but did not announce a breakthrough in talks to end the war in Ukraine. 

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)