Abortion Watch

Patrick Clancy Breaks His Silence After Lindsay Clancy Mistrial– www.vanityfair.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Denis learned about the death of Clancy’s children during their first coffee date. “I know I can’t bring his kids back,” Denis told 60 Minutes. “But if I can honor them and allow Pat to grieve but also just continue to honor them in the present, I guess that’s all I can do.”

Earlier in the interview, Patrick was asked if he struggled with suicidal thoughts after his children’s deaths. “There was a time that I didn’t think I’d live to see my 35th birthday. And I was completely fine with it,” he said, later adding, “My life has changed since I met Rachel in such a positive way.”

The couple is expecting a baby together. When asked what he plans to tell his child about their siblings, Patrick replied: “I think every parent can agree, you have different relationships with your kids, but they’re all your kids. And I can’t wait to tell them about their brothers and sister.”

Speaking with correspondent Ross Douthat, Patrick recalled the day that “everything just came to a screeching halt” on January 24, 2023—when his ex-wife, a former Massachusetts labor and delivery nurse, killed their three children at their home.

Unhinged Female Jurors Are Mad That the Lindsay Clancy Holdout Focused on the Facts– townhall.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Two things: the female jurors need to shut the hell up. We get it — you wanted child killer Lindsay Clancy to get away with it—Second, what a nasty piece of work NBC Boston was by pretty much leading the online leftist activist community right to the man. His family was targeted; then his brother started yapping, another ‘what the hell are you doing’ moment; and finally, his disclosure, despite the judge sealing the names of the jury.

It’s not unusual for jurors to spill their guts after a trial, or for other profiles to be written about the rest of the body, but that’s only after the court releases their names. Alex Gutentag of Public delved into the sordid antics the progressive Left has displayed since the trial.

The lone juror who prevented a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict was Michael Desronvil, a Catholic MAGA supporter from a Haitian immigrant family. So the Left, which claims to be the vanguard for all black people, attacked a black man because he didn’t go along with the shenanigans of insufferable suburban white women after ten thousand bottles of wine. NBC Boston went to unusual lengths to attack Desronvil, who, as it seems, was the only person to look at the evidence and not view this case as one where children must be sacrificed for a larger discussion about mental health. It’s a lengthy and thorough post about this case devolving into a circus, how leftist logic leads to nothing but brain rot, and how if this is how leftists behave on juries, our system of justice might be in severe trouble (via Public):

The NBC Boston story is part of a larger public smear campaign that began before a mistrial was even declared. The jury foreperson initially alleged that the holdout was not faithfully applying the law during deliberations. Kevin Reddington, Clancy’s defense attorney, tried to have the juror removed and accused him of “bias” against people with mental illness.

Woke female governor learns WRONG lesson from Lindsay Clancy with creepy new government intrusion into new mothers– www.louderwithcrowder.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

There are two schools of thought with Lindsay Clancy. One is that she had no control over her actions when she murdered her three children because something something postpardum. The other school of thought is f*ck her, she murdered her three kids. Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey – yes, she’s a white woman – is in the former group and wants the state government to target all new mothers.

We should point out that this is the same state where they stripped Catholic parents of custody of their kid for refusing to go along with transitioning to a new gender. It’s also the same state where progressives shop for district court judges to rule against anything Donald Trump attempts to do ever, which they always do.

Healey was being interviewed on Boston Public Radio and had the following to say:

Everybody in the state, when you have a baby, you’re going to have a home visit. You’re going to have a home visit within days, weeks, and that will be an opportunity for a health care provider to make an assessment to see if you need some additional support and resources.

The now-doxed Lindsay Clancy juror who prevented the mother of three from escaping criminal justice is now in hiding, along with his family. The juror, Michael Desronvil, has remained defiant, claiming he voted on the merits of the case, which showed Clancy was guilty of first-degree murder.

His family has received numerous death threats. He has acquired a lawyer as he prepares to sue the press and the jurors responsible for both doxing him and committing slander against him.

Holdout juror in Lindsay Clancy trial taken to ‘secure location’– www.washingtonexaminer.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has been taken to a “secure location,” his attorney announced Thursday, after other members of the jury in the high-profile case alleged the lone juror had doubts the mother of three was sane when killing her children.

Michael Desronvil was the holdout juror in the Massachusetts trial, which ultimately ended in a mistrial after the jury was unable to make a unanimous decision. Several other members of the jury have since come forward with accusations that Desronvil had admitted to having doubt, but refused to agree to a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict.

Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal they were hellbent on social justice, not the law– www.lifesitenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

(LifeSiteNews) — The truth has come out: From the outset, activist jurors in the Lindsay Clancy triple murder trial were bound and determined to advance a leftist political agenda rather than justice for the precious children that Clancy strangled to death.  

Other than a lone juror who has been crucified by his fellow jurors and doxxed by corporate media, Clancy’s liberal, female-dominated jury ignored their civic duty to render a verdict based on the facts of the case and instead decided they would imitate activist judges, using their platform to advance their own perverse feminist cause.

The cadre of social justice jurors accused the holdout of ignoring the judge’s instructions while all along it was they who had ignored the law.   

During a weekend CBS Morning show, juror Paula Devlin spilled the beans: “We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women in the future.”

Lindsay Clancy mistrial juror Desronvil disputes having any doubts– www.foxnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The lone holdout juror whose refusal to find Lindsay Clancy not guilty by reason of insanity led to a mistrial is speaking publicly for the first time, disputing claims from fellow jurors that he expressed doubts about the prosecution’s case.

Michael P. Desronvil said in a statement to NewsNation that he never wavered in his belief prosecutors proved Clancy knew what she was doing when she strangled her three young children in January 2023.

“I didn’t have any doubts. As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence present,” Desronvil said.

Brother of Lindsay Clancy holdout juror sheds light on pivotal decision — reveals family ‘cannot leave the house’: Report– www.theblaze.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The brother of the lone holdout juror who sparked a mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy murder case revealed new details about his sibling’s controversial decision, according to a new report.

The New York Post interviewed a man the outlet identified as the brother of the unnamed juror who refused to join the other 11 members of the jury in the polarizing case of the Massachusetts mother and the extent of her criminal responsibility in the deaths of her three young children.

‘They won’t leave us alone, and we don’t know anything.’

“He looked at the case, and he made the call,” the brother told the Post. “For me, that’s how I would do it. I would just listen to the case with all the evidence, and go from there.”

The brother noted, “His choice was good for some people, but not good for other people.”

The brother pushed back against unfounded claims that the juror’s Catholic faith influenced his jury decision.

“I don’t think religion had anything to do with it,” the brother stated.

California Drags Pro-Lifers To Court For Crime Of ‘Offering Hope’– thefederalist.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

California Attorney General Rob Bonta wants a court to punish pro-life organizations for telling women they may have another choice after starting a chemical abortion.

His case against Heartbeat International and RealOptions targets their communications about abortion pill reversal and seeks millions in penalties along with restrictions on what they can say. But to understand what California is asking the court to suppress, look beyond the legal briefs and listen to the women who actually sought that help.

Three of them took the witness stand. They told the court what happened when they took mifepristone, regretted their decisions, and desperately searched for a way to keep their babies and continue their pregnancies. Today, each is raising the child she feared she had lost.

And in California’s own closing brief, the state described what these women received from Heartbeat and RealOptions with a remarkable word: “hope.”

“That Defendants offered hope to these individuals underscores the seriousness of their misconduct.” Those words appear on page 45 of the California attorney general’s post-trial brief in The People of the State of California v. Heartbeat International and RealOptions.

The “individuals” are women who took the first drug in a chemical abortion, regretted that decision, and urgently searched for another option. The “hope” was that they might still be able to sustain their babies and continue their pregnancies. The “misconduct” was telling them about abortion pill reversal.

Massachusetts Measure to Repeal Abortions Up to Birth Gets Approval– www.lifenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Attorney General Andrea Campbell has just approved our petition to repeal Governor Healey’s radical abortion-up-to-birth law!

Now it’s time to get to work collecting necessary signatures. We need your help!

Our statewide effort is underway to suspend and repeal Massachusetts’ new full-term abortion law. That law, which will allow abortions to be performed up to birth, including in cases involving healthy mothers and viable unborn babies, is scheduled to take effect November 8. Governor Healey signed it on August 10, following its controversial passage in the House and Senate.

As we previously announced, Massachusetts Citizens for Life is partnering with Mass. Family Action and the Massachusetts Alliance to Stop Taxpayer Funded Abortion in a signature gathering effort to ultimately repeal the law and restore common sense protections for unborn infants and their mothers. To do so, we formed The Compassionate Care Coalition, a ballot committee dedicated to getting a suspend and repeal question on the ballot for 2028.

Lindsay Clancy Juror’s Take on What Justice Looks Like for the Murdered Children Is Beyond Appalling– townhall.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

I’m tired, man. These women are crazy. The more they talk, the more I think the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy case is a hero. It’s nuts. It’s all-around nuts. Child murder has not just been rationalized and trivialized here but has been used as a springboard for a mental health dialogue. No. And one said that a spotlight on this issue would serve as justice for Clancy’s three dead kids, whom she murdered with exercise bands in January 2023.

Lone Holdout Juror Revealed to be Black Republican, Conservative Catholic in Interview With YouTuber After Being Doxxed By Media– amgreatness.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The lone holdout juror on the Lindsay Clancy trial is a conservative Republican who has lived with nonstop threats of violence since his guilty vote led to a mistrial, according to his exclusive interview with an independent journalist.

The holdout juror, Michael P. Desronvil, broke his silence Tuesday night after the Boston Globe identified him in a highly unflattering report detailing domestic violence allegations against him, as well as eviction proceedings that were ongoing at the time of the trial.

Desronvil gave his side of the story to Ray Marcel of the Fugitive TV podcast, opening up about his divorce, his September 2021 arrest for domestic violence, and the eight “activist” women on the jury.

Marcel said Desronvil was “very well spoken, very nice, very kind” with him on the phone, and noted that he is a conservative Catholic.

The YouTuber displayed the letter from the Plymouth Trial Court calling Desronvil to jury duty to prove the man’s identity.

Gay Dad’s Gross Diary Illuminates Dysfunctions Of Buying Babies– thefederalist.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

New York Magazine recently published the sex diary of a 42-year-old gay dad living outside Boston. He and his “husband,” Gavin, have an infant daughter, Sophie, who was presumably born through paid surrogacy.

At 10 a.m., Dad opens Sniffies, a location-based app used primarily by men seeking anonymous sex.

Over the next seven days, he propositions a married man who initially refuses to show his face. He has sex with that stranger on his infant daughter’s leaf-shaped play mat while her stuffed giraffe knocks against his head. He sends Gavin a photo of himself in a jockstrap, hoping he will leave work early. He ends the week having sex with a police officer at a party up against a washing machine.

One infant. Two gay men. No mother. Welcome to the post-Obergefell family.

From the adult’s side, the diary is supposed to read as naughty, funny, and liberated. From Sophie’s perspective, this isn’t a cheeky account about sexual liberation. It’s a record of her fundamental biological and developmental needs being subordinated to a sex-crazed man.

Senate Confirms Pro-Life State Judge for Federal Judgeship– www.lifenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The Senate on Tuesday confirmed Ohio appeals court Judge Matthew R. Byrne, who has a career of pro-life work, to a lifetime seat on the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

The vote was 52-45.

President Donald Trump nominated Byrne on the recommendation of Ohio’s two Republican senators and Vice President JD Vance. Byrne, a Republican, was elected to Ohio’s Twelfth District Court of Appeals in 2020 after a decade as an employment litigator.

Sen. Jon Husted, R-Ohio, told the Senate Judiciary Committee in June that Byrne had decided more than 800 appeals and written majority, concurring and dissenting opinions in nearly 250 cases.

“Judge Byrne has earned a distinguished reputation as a hardworking, thoughtful, and fair judge,” Husted said. “He has remained dedicated to upholding the reputation of the court and the rule of law.”

Byrne has been affiliated with Ohio Right to Life, Cincinnati Right to Life, Warren County Right to Life, the Center for Christian Virtue and the Federalist Society. He also served on the board of a pro-life pregnancy center.

‘Feminist’ on Lindsay Clancy Jury Just Threw More Gasoline on the Fire – RedState– redstate.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

America, I regret to inform you that the Clancy jurors are still talking.

One juror in particular is continuing to do massive damage to the credibility of the 11-1 decision that resulted in a mistrial. Nine “angry women” and two beta-males were unwilling to convict Clancy, and it increasingly looks like they had an axe to grind.

The lone holdout juror — a black man effectively doxxed in a smear campaign — was ultimately able to hold true to his convictions despite what looks like an agenda-driven environment.

The picture these women are painting with their needless comments is that they were belligerently pushing a narrative to get the lone holdout to cave and acquit an accused murderer.

That poor man. He should never have to buy his own drink in America again.

According to an outspoken juror, Paula Devlin, the jury saw the Clancy case as a chance to promote a “feminist” cause.

They Now Call Population Control “Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights”– www.lifenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The term “sexual and reproductive health and rights,” or SRHR, did not appear out of nowhere. It grew out of a political problem.

For years, the United Nations and Western governments spoke openly about “population control.” But that language generated resistance, particularly from developing countries that had every reason to distrust wealthy nations telling poorer nations that they had too many children. Worse, population programs in the 1970s and 1980s became associated with coercive practices, including forced or pressured contraception and sterilization. Even UNFPA now acknowledges that the move away from population targets came partly in response to abuses connected with population-control policies.

So the vocabulary changed.

Instead of controlling populations, the UN increasingly spoke about “reproductive health,” “reproductive rights,” and eventually “sexual and reproductive health and rights.” The language sounded softer. More personal. More rooted in health and individual rights.

One of the central figures in that transformation was Nafis Sadik, the longtime executive director of the United Nations Population Fund and Secretary-General of the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) in Cairo. Sadik aggressively promoted the reproductive-rights framework that came to dominate UN population policy. Cairo became the turning point.

The 1994 conference did not simply update population policy. It changed its vocabulary and architecture. UNFPA itself says Cairo “introduced the concepts of sexual and reproductive health and reproductive rights” and advanced a new definition of population policy centered on reproductive health and women’s empowerment.

Lindsay Clancy ‘Bombshell’: Juror Says Advancing ‘Feminism’ Was Major Factor in Decision – RedState– redstate.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

As if several of the Lindsay Clancy jurors’ are on a mission to do as much damage as they can to the justice system, another one has come forward with a stunning insight into the jury’s deliberations.

It turns out, feminism was a major factor, according to one juror. This has to be seen to be believed.

“We knew that this was a turning point, and this would be something that could change something to make it better for other women. You know, justice for those children is this never happening again,” juror Paula Davlin said.

This goes to a point that I have been making for years: Social justice is ultimately a perversion of actual justice. That is because justice is a matter of an individual’s actions, not a matter of group identity.

What This Clancy Juror Admitted to Is the Worst Revelation Yet – PJ Media– pjmedia.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

When Lindsay Clancy’s trial for killing her three young children ended in a hung jury, the reason for the split became a bigger story than the verdict itself. The lone juror who refused to find Clancy not criminally responsible for her actions was the only black member of the panel, and the pile-on that followed has revealed something far uglier than one holdout‘s stubbornness.

No one ever disputed that Clancy killed her three children. The only question before Plymouth County Superior Court was whether she was criminally responsible or legally insane when she did it.

Since the judge declared a mistrial, several jurors have gone public, and one of them, Paula Devlin, has done more damage to her own credibility than to the holdout’s.

Devlin, who favored the not-criminally-responsible verdict, didn’t even hold back when she attacked the holdout juror. “He was very arrogant, he really did not take anything that anybody said,” Devlin said. “The nurses [on the jury], he tried to ask a question about the medications, and we went back to the report from South Shore Hospital. We had the toxicology report, we could see exactly the amounts. The nurses in the room spoke to that and talked to that. […] They spoke to that specific thing. That was a question that he had, and he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him.”

Lindsay Clancy, the woman who has admitted to strangling her three children to death with premeditation, was about to go free thanks to progressive jurors. But one black man confounded them, holding out to force a mistrial. One juror told progressive state media that the man “just couldn’t get over the fact that she viciously murdered her children.”

“A Black Man is the Holdout Juror? I Have to Sit With That for Just a Second” – CBS Host Gayle King Stunned to Learn Lone Clancy Holdout Was a Black Guy– www.thegatewaypundit.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

CBS host Gayle King exhibited dismay upon learning that a black man was the lone holdout juror who did not vote to acquit in the Lindsay Clancy case, saying he needed a moment to come to terms with the revelation. 

Clancy killed her three children, and admitted to the crime, but the defense argues she is not guilty by reason of insanity. A mistrial was declared last week after one male juror held the line.

During a Friday CBS interview with juror Paula Devlin, King wanted to know exactly who the holdout juror was, likely thinking he was a heartless White man.

“I’m curious about the jurors themselves because we know it was nine women, three men. What was the age range? What was the racial makeup? I haven’t heard any of that. What was it?” she asked Devlin.  

Devlin revealed that the jurors ranged in age from “70ish to 22” and that it was all White with one person of color. She then confirmed that the lone holdout juror was a black man.

“A black man is a holdout juror,” King responded. “Well, I have to sit with that for just a second.” She was apparently devastated to learn that a black man would try to enforce the law.

WATCH: Exorcist priest slams women supporting Lindsay Clancy– www.lifesitenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:


(LifeSiteNews) —Father Dan Reehil, an exorcist in the Diocese of Nashville, criticized during a Sunday homily the numerous women supporters who have rallied behind Lindsay Clancy, the Massachusetts mother whose trial for murdering her three young children ended in a mistrial last week.

During a September 6 homily focused on the need for the faithful to call out evil, Fr. Reehil briefly highlighted the insanity of the women who have come out in support of Clancy and encouraged any men dating a woman who supports her to break up with them.

As reported extensively by LifeSiteNews, Clancy evaded conviction last week for the 2023 murder of her three children when a mistrial was declared after the jury was unable to reach a unanimous verdict. The fact that she did it was undisputed, but the defense argued she was not responsible due to “postpartum psychosis” that allegedly brought her to a point at which she decided to end her children’s lives before attempting to kill herself.

The full clip is viewable below from about 5:25-6:36.

“There is no universe that exists where a man would kill three of his children and be going to the courthouse, and hundreds of men would show up to rally behind him. That world doesn’t exist,” Fr. Reehil said during his homily. “But somehow there’s women out there that think this is a good thing. So now we are promoting killing children outside the womb. Is this not crazy? This is crazy.”

“Yes, I understand she was on all these drugs and all the other things. Seek help, you’re a grown woman! This is a catastrophe that … and we should pray for her. I think she has demons, to be honest,” the priest added.

New Mexico is Building Yet Another Tax-payer-Funded Abortion Center– www.lifenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

As construction advances on New Mexico’s first $10 million forced taxpayer-funded abortion killing center in Las Cruces, NM, the New Mexico Alliance for Life (NMAFL) confirms that pro-abortion administrators at the University of New Mexico (UNM), in partnership with state officials, are targeting Las Vegas, NM as the site for the second state-funded abortion killing center.

The information comes directly from Christopher Arndt, M.D., Interim President and CEO of the UNM Health Sciences Center, during a 2026 University of New Mexico Board of Regents meeting earlier this year.

Get the latest pro-life news and information on X (Twitter).

Discussing the state’s plans for a second facility, Arndt said:

“And we are looking for the best locations to potentially build a like-minded clinic with another $10 million appropriation from a year ago in northern New Mexico. After discussions with the state of New Mexico, it was found that Las Vegas, New Mexico would be the ideal location for that.”

In an effort to find evidence on where the state was planning to build the second state-funded abortion killing center, NMAFL previously submitted several Inspection of Public Records Act (IPRA) requests. Many of these requests were denied or came up empty, indicating a concerted effort to conceal their plans for as long as possible.

WATCH: Leftist student tells pro-lifer: ‘You’re going to get Charlie Kirked’– www.lifesitenews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:


(LifeSiteNews) – On the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk’s murder, left-wing vitriol toward the conservative influencer has not ebbed, as evidenced by a viral video of a recent interaction between a pro-lifer and a group of pro-abortion students.

On September 6, the group Abolitionists Rising shared a video clip of the reception received by a young woman holding a sign displaying aborted baby remains, highlighting the gruesome effect of abortion pills. The location of the interaction was not shared.

The clip begins with one girl calling the activist a f***ing femcel” with a “really ugly” haircut. The conversation devolves from there, though some cursory debating of pro-abortion talking points does occur. At one point, another girl asks, “Do you even go to this school?” to which the pro-lifer answers, “No, I’m not even from here.”

“Okay, then why the f*** are you here?” the questioner follows up, answered by “to have conversations.”

“You’re going to get Charlie Kirked someday if you keep doing this kind of s***,” the interrogator declares. 

Clancy Jurors Break Silence & They are More Insane Than You Thought – GUEST Jillian Michaels– www.louderwithcrowder.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

It took a little longer than we thought, but it’s finally happened. Jimmy Kimmel has an enddate. And the death of late night television continues. Andrew Garfield just can’t stop himself. Here’s his latest. The jurors from the Lindsay Clancy trial are just as insane as you thought they were. They’re speaking out now against the big bad juror who stuck to his principles. We have Jillian Michaels on to discuss the Lindsay Clancy case.

WATCH & REACT

ENTERTAINMENT MINUTE: ANDREW GARFIELD HATES BILLIONAIRES

CRAZY CLANCY JURORS SPEAK OUT


Lawyer for Illinois mom who hanged 2-year-old son claims she was in ‘psychotic episode’ | The Post Millennial– thepostmillennial.com
News Source
EXCERPT:


“It is also a tragedy that Corie herself was experiencing a psychotic episode at the time this happened.”

Lawyers representing an Illinois mom who was reportedly obsessed with the Lindsay Clancy trial and has been arrested for the murder of her 2-year-old son have claimed that she suffered a “psychotic episode” when the killing took place.

Corie Walsh, 38, has been charged with murder after her 2-year-old son was killed by hanging from the rafters of the basement. Prosecutors said that Walsh allegedly told police that she killed the child because she believed him to be the “anti-Christ” and the “devil.” Prosecutors have also said that Walsh was extremely invested in the Clancy trial, where the Massachusetts mom admitted to killing her three children by strangling them and then tried to kill herself.

Walsh’s attorney, Andrea Lyon, has claimed that Walsh suffered from a severe mental break at the time of the killing of her son. Police were called to the family’s home on Tuesday after a teenage neighbor saw the toddler dead in the basement and started CPR. The child was taken to the hospital and pronounced dead. The coroner said that the child had been killed by asphyxia.

“It is also a tragedy that Corie herself was experiencing a psychotic episode at the time this happened. It is our hope that through a thorough presentation and investigation of the facts, that all of us will come to see this heartbreak for what it is,” Lyon said, per CBS News.

Walsh was found with cuts on her wrists and thighs in her bathtub. She was taken to the hospital for the non-life-threatening injuries and has been transferred to the Will County Adult Detention Facility.

Walsh is set to appear in court on September 8. The Illinois Department of Child and Family Services said that they had no prior contact with the Walsh family until the incident took place.

Illinois mom charged with killing toddler was following Clancy trial– www.boston.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

An Illinois woman charged with killing her 2-year-old son had been closely following the murder trial of Massachusetts mother Lindsay Clancy and was texting friends about the case just hours before her son was found dead, prosecutors said.

Corie Walsh, 40, was charged with three counts of first-degree murder after her son, Barrett, was found dead in the basement of the family’s suburban Chicago home on Sept. 1, according to court records obtained by NBC Chicago.

Prosecutors said Walsh had become “very invested” in Clancy’s nationally watched trial and was discussing it with friends until about 12:30 p.m. that day. A neighbor found Barrett less than four hours later.

Walsh was found elsewhere in the home with injuries authorities said were self-inflicted. Prosecutors said she later told investigators that she killed her son because she believed he was the “devil” and the “anti-Christ.” Her attorney, Andrea Lyon, told reporters Walsh was experiencing a psychotic episode and called the boy’s death a tragedy for the entire family.

Police were called to Walsh’s home in Frankfort, about 35 miles (56.33 kilometers) southwest of Chicago, shortly before 4 p.m. after a neighbor discovered Barrett in the basement, according to prosecutors’ petition seeking to keep Walsh jailed before trial.

The neighbor found the boy and began CPR while calling 911, prosecutors said. He was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead. An autopsy determined that he died from asphyxia caused by ligature compression of the neck.

Police searching the house found Walsh fully dressed in a bathtub containing bloody water, prosecutors said. She had cuts to her wrists and thighs and was taken to a hospital with injuries authorities described as not life-threatening.

Bonnie Blue uses her new baby as a prop to promote adult content | The Post Millennial– thepostmillennial.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

 

“I just had a baby, but that means that the 6-week rule does not apply to me because I had a C-section.”

Porn star Bonnie Blue has been slammed online after displaying her reportedly newborn baby in what appeared to be a preamble to some of her adult content.

In a clip of the video that has gone viral on X, the porn star, whose real name is Tia Billinger, said, “I just had a baby, but that means that the 6-week rule does not apply to me because I had a C-section.”

“Down there, still looking perfect,” she said as she motioned to her genitals with three masked men around her. Billinger is known for stunts that include having sex with groups of men, ranging from the hundreds up to 1,000, for her adult content account.

Earlier in August, Billinger gave birth to the baby and said that the baby was conceived naturally instead of through IVF.

The video was blasted by people online. One user on X said that “social services need to be called immediately.”

INGERSOLL: Three Angry, Old Women Failed To Convince The Lone Juror– dailycaller.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Below is State of the Day, a morning newsletter by Daily Caller Editor-at-Large Geoff Ingersoll. Sign up here.

__________

Greetings, Dear Reader,

I might have mentioned this in previous State of the Days, but my favorite bit of Ingersoll genealogy is that I’m related to the guy who hosted the first ever witch trials … in a bar.

Lieutenant Nathaniel Ingersoll was a prominent local business owner, militia member, and church leader. Of the 20 women he either accused or testified against, eight were hanged.

By the way, did you see …

THE THREE CRONES

There’s The Fates, The Grey Sisters, The Norns, and most popularly due to Shakespeare, The Weird Sisters, and then there’s the three batty crones who appeared on local television last night to complain incessantly about the one juror who refused to acquit Lindsay Clancy.

The three, who (ironically?) appeared on NBC and CBS Boston, made no attempt to mask their disgust of the prosecution and the lone male juror who refused to acquiesce to their appeals.

They accused the prosecution of lacking “compassion.” They said there was no “smoking gun” to prove Clancy’s guilt. They called the holdout juror “very arrogant” for not listening to the “nurses” in the room.

Yes, there were nurses in the room. Not that I want to digress, but some people are calling their reliance on external “expertise” cause for a mistrial. And to not digress further: About one third of nurses have some form of mental illness themselves!

Moving on … in the most disturbing clip of all, which simply must be watched, the three of them utterly lambast the holdout.

Here’s a transcript, emphasis mine (I’m withholding juror names, if you want to find them, it’s not difficult):

Juror 1:
He had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt after we watched that video of the interview. I think that’s when it was. He admitted he had reasonable doubt, and I started filling out the forms. I was so excited. There were three forms I had to fill out, and I started filling them out. I wrote my signature on each one, and then he said, “But I’m still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.”

Juror 2:

He was very arrogant. He really did not take anything that anybody said. He tried to ask a question about the medications, and we went back to the report from South Shore Hospital. We had the toxicology report. We could see exactly the amounts. The nurses in the room spoke to that. That was a question that he had. And he just completely disregarded the information that they gave him.

Juror 3:

I’m not sure if “rogue” is the right word. But every one of us, in the hours of our frustration, would get up and walk the room, because you just couldn’t sit anymore, and would all go to the cart with the exhibits. He, I think, got up to the cart once, very briefly, and went back to his seat. He would not interact with us and try to understand.

We read to him on numerous occasions the definition of reasonable doubt from Judge Sullivan’s instruction. He actually said one day in the end, “Well, why don’t we have the judge come in and read it again?” And we were like, “No. We have it in front of us. We don’t need that.” And we would highlight it — this is the definition of reasonable doubt. But he had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.

I genuinely had to do a double take when I read that last portion. He couldn’t get past “the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.”

Well no kidding, huh?

(Also, I’m not sure what exactly the third one is on, but her speech was slurred enough to call for a roadside test.)

We’ve also got the rapidly infamous “no smoking gun” assertion from a fourth juror who (wisely) chose to stay anonymous.

But she also recounted how she’d essentially been bullied into an acquittal despite her initial intuition.

Transcript:

Juror:

A majority of the people — it doesn’t matter what side it was on — was very firm in their stance and their beliefs kind of from the beginning. This standalone juror was not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side. So I’m going to kind of defend that individual in a sense. There were some big personalities in that room. But at the end of the day, it just came down to an inability to move past your convictions. And even after that dynamite charge, to be unable to self-analyze yourself and be like, ‘Okay, am I missing something? Am I failing to acknowledge or give this doubt the weight that it needs?’ That majority of the room was trying to sway that person from the very beginning.

Reporter:

So where did you come down from the very beginning? What was your vote?

Juror:

Originally I felt as though she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it. And maybe I still believe that in a certain way. I think that this was a woman who was not mentally healthy. She was someone that was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis. I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out. And this was the only option.

Truly wild.

… what an evolution of the term. From “ugly, withered or unpleasant” to “wise and respected post-menopausal woman.”

MORE LINKS

Leftist Professor Doxxes ICE Agent, Urges Crowd To ‘F*ck Him Up’

This is who is teaching the next generation.

ROOKE: Trump Admin’s Boastful Post Shows We’re Leaving Half Of Country Behind

What are all the men up to?

Trump Honors ‘The Man In The Red Bandana’ With Medal Of Freedom

A nice moment.


Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Accidentally Admit They Made Their Decision Based on the Wrong Criteria– www.westernjournal.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

After Friday’s mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, three jurors have come forward revealing how they saw the outcome — and their perspective is just as bad as you would imagine.

Clancy was on trial for the deaths of her three children in January 2023. Her defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, argued she should not be held criminally responsible due to postpartum depression and psychosis. A mistrial was declared after one juror held out against the rest, refusing to retreat from the charges against her.

Now, we’re hearing from three women who saw it differently and gave an interview to WBTS — Paula Devlin, Roni Carlson, and Kellie Farina.

Their comments showed they were completely clueless and favored Clancy for reasons that had nothing to do with the law.

WBTS posted the interview to YouTube on Tuesday. Farina called the prosecution’s opening statement “harsh,” and said she did not like that they did not present character witnesses for Clancy. “You’re presenting all these medical professionals, but nobody’s presenting for the prosecution, a woman, a mother of three children.”

“I found it to be biased right out of the gate.”

Should Lindsay Clancy have been convicted of murder?

Why would the prosecution need to talk about her character?

Reddington admitted she killed three children. Would talking about her role as a mother before killing three children completely excuse that completely evil act?

What does “bias” have to do with anything? They are the prosecution. They are trying to prove she murdered her children.

“There is no compassion in this courtroom right now,” Farina recalled, apparently forgetting that compassion was not shown to the children Clancy killed.

When Devlin was asked if the prosecution said anything she considered in her decision, she gave a blunt “no.”

Related:

A Lindsay Clancy-Inspired Murder? Hours Before Boy, 2, Was Found Hanging from Rafter, Mom Was Discussing Clancy Online: Court Docs

On the other side, all three women could not stop swooning over Reddington. It was not because of the legality of his defense. They just seemed to like him.

Carlson recalled laughing at Reddington, saying his demeanor was “funny,” adding that “he was entertaining, which was good because we needed some of that.”

Devlin noted he was both “arrogant and entertaining,” before Farina added “but compassionate,” to which Devlin agreed.

“His compassion toward Lindsay was amazing,” she added.

Again, none of this should have anything to do with a murder trial and the facts presented.

It is clear these women went off of their emotions and were ready to let a child killer go free.

All three of them should be embarrassed to admit these things.

It is further proof that the one holdout juror was possibly the only sane voice during deliberations.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Tags:

, , , , , , , , , , ,


JUST IN: Lindsay Clancy Juror Makes Shocking Admission: ‘I Thought She Was Guilty’– trendingpoliticsnews.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

A juror who ultimately voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy has revealed she originally believed the Massachusetts mother was guilty and criminally responsible for killing her three young children.

The anonymous woman, identified by CBS Boston as juror No. 5, said her opinion changed during contentious deliberations that ended with an 11-1 deadlock and a mistrial last week.

The juror said she knew little about the nationally followed case before being selected because she does not regularly watch the news.

She entered deliberations leaning toward conviction.

‘Originally, I felt that she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it.’

Even after voting to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity, the juror acknowledged that she remains conflicted about the case.

‘Maybe I still believe that Clancy is guilty, in a certain way,’ she admitted.

Clancy, 36, is charged with killing her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.

She admitted strangling the children with exercise bands but pleaded not guilty, with her defense arguing that postpartum psychosis left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.

Prosecutors maintained that Clancy was criminally responsible and deliberately carried out the killings.

The anonymous juror said the evidence initially left her inclined to side with prosecutors, particularly the harrowing 911 call made by Clancy’s husband, Patrick, after discovering the children.

‘I will never be the same after that 911 call,’ the juror said.

The recording was played for jurors but has not been publicly released.

She also pushed back against online conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy of killing the children and framing his wife.

‘If these people could have heard that visceral, blood-curdling scream,’ she said. ‘It was horrifying.’

But her assessment of Lindsay Clancy‘s criminal responsibility shifted as jurors reviewed the evidence and debated her mental condition.

RELATED: NEW: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Their Silence In Interview After Mistrial

‘I think this was a woman who was not mentally healthy, she was in the throes of a significant mental crisis,’ the juror said.

‘I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out, and this was the only option.’

She eventually concluded that prosecutors had not eliminated enough doubt for her to convict.

‘There was not a single moment throughout that presentation of that case that you could say, ‘Oh yep, 100 percent I’m certain she did it,” she recalled. ‘There is too much gray area.’

The juror also offered a dramatically different view of the lone holdout who prevented an acquittal.

Three other jurors who spoke publicly this week criticized the unidentified man for refusing to change his vote, but juror No. 5 said he was not the only person in the room who had dug in.

RELATED: Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Sends Jaw-Dropping Message To Trump

‘This standalone juror was not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side, so I’m going to kind of defend that individual,’ she said.

‘There were some big personalities in that room, but at the end of the day, I feel like it just came down to an inability to move past your convictions.’

She said other jurors began trying to persuade the holdout early in the deliberations, with tensions eventually growing intense enough that arguments could reportedly be heard outside the jury room.

Foreperson Roni Carlson and jurors Kellie Farina and Paula Devlin have separately said the holdout acknowledged having reasonable doubt but still refused to return a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict.

Carlson recalled becoming optimistic that the jury had finally reached an agreement before the man again refused to acquit.

‘but I’m still not going to say she’s not guilty,’ Carlson recalled.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial Sept. 4 after more than a week of deliberations failed to produce a unanimous verdict.

The latest juror interview now reveals that the final 11-1 split did not necessarily reflect where every juror began. At least one woman who ultimately sided with Clancy entered the jury room believing she was guilty before changing her position after reviewing the case with the other jurors.

POLL: Do You Believe Transgenderism Is A Mental Illness?


By Staff

  1. THE FAUCI DIARY

During the Covid-19 pandemic (or plandemic), our governments put party agenda over human life. Relying on the state for critical healthcare has proven to be an existential challenge to humanity.

Editor Paul Gordon Collier wrote in his August 7, 2026, Deep Dive “How the Smartest Man in the World Almost Killed It,” America chose a messianic General willing to play fast and loose with the facts, and willing to hack off body parts to save the whole, so long as those body parts weren’t his. That man was Dr. Anthony Fauci. He was once the center of power in much of the “free world” during the coronavirus plandemic.

“His decisions would not only influence other nations, but America’s inability to be a beacon of liberty in the time of coronavirus had profound effects on the rest of the ‘free world.’ America legitimized tyranny because ‘the smartest man in the world’ said it was the best thing to do.

“His influence in assuring the coronavirus plandemic maintained its emergency status led to the dramatic expansion of mail-in ballots, setting the stage for a 2020 election where more than 70% of the votes were ‘cast’ through the unreliable, unaccountable mass mailer system (which was even less reliable and accountable than the ones we have now).

“This would dramatically change the trajectory of America, from one challenging Chinese power, the International Order, and European elitism, to one that bowed to China, lifted up the International Order, and feted European elites.”

We do not recommend you entirely abandon the mainstream healthcare system, but we do recommend you develop “off-grid” healthcare plans so that if we are ever faced with another coronavirus-like event we can provide for our healthcare needs without having to submit to draconian rules to do so.

Here are three sources to begin your exploration of Off-Grid Healthcare:

  • Nobody Talks About Healthcare Off-Grid – Frugal Off Grid – This will introduce you to the off-grid healthcare concept, and even get you started on how to develop your own plans. It includes a video.
  • Direct Primary Care – Going “Off Grid” With Your Health – Homesteading Family – This article is aimed at people considering going off-grid, or homesteading, but it will help you build your own supplemental off-grid healthcare plan for yourself. Should another plandemic hit, you will be prepared with alternative sources for healthcare.
  • Healthcare Steps You Should Take Before Going Off-Grid – reThinkSurvival.com – This is another article aimed at people considering going off-grid, but it’s about preventative healthcare you can take in your own home (like having a supply of “brain food”).
  1. THE LAND WITH THE AI PRIZE – THE STATE OF AFGHANISTAN

In our August 21, 2026, issue of MIA, we did a Deep Dive on the state of Afghanistan. We wrote, “For most of its existence, Afghanistan has been under the thumb of conquerors who could never quite seal the deal. Its hope of achieving sovereign power in light of the jewels beneath its soil is slim to none, no matter which power, America or China, were to secure access to Afghanistan’s AI prize.

We assess that America as the hegemon will offer greater opportunity for shared flourishing for self-stewarding people than China as hegemon ever would, for China would continue to support the Taliban if they ever broke the factions.

The Islamic State has no allies, for its endgame is world domination, even over China, even over America. The other factions have strong ties to India, Russia, and some to Iran, but all have ties to America and the West as well.

The alliance of China, Russia, and Iran coming out in open support of the Taliban against Pakistan has strained those relations with the factions we featured in our report. Even Pakistan is finding itself gravitating back towards the West as it sees China’s closeness with India and Afghanistan as working against its own interests.

The war with Afghanistan has only accelerated that re-engagement with the West both from Pakistan and the major factions we cover in this report (sans the Islamic State, of course).”

Dependence on Superpower AI for your development, and even your own AI processing power, brings with it the risk we see for Afghanistan, the loss of sovereign, or self-stewarding power. In the case of Afghanistan, this has been their struggle for centuries.

For you, the rise of AI means two things, learning how to work without AI tools, or learning how to effectively use AI tools. For most, the latter is more realistic than the former. For those in the latter group, we recommend you make it a regular habit to utilize multiple AI agents, including open-source AI agents. This will prevent you from becoming too attached or dependent on one AI “voice.” It will also get you overall better results, especially with research.

We utilize multiple AIs during our research process, asking each one the same probing question.

For Afghanistan, their lack of sovereignty will be born from their dependence on a superpower to secure their lands and develop their mineral prizes. For you, AI dependence, especially on superpower AI, is risking becoming propagandized by those same tools.

Here are resources to help you prepare for a world with AI without becoming AI’s tool:

  1. USEFUL LIFE VERSUS SACRED LIFE

In our August 28, 2026, Weekly issue of MIA, Paul Gordon Collier analyzed two separate news stories that both served as bellwethers for the existential cultural divide in America today.

Paul wrote, “It is white progressive women in particular who have served as the frontline assassins of whites, males, heterosexuals, cis-gendered, and white-aligned Americans. Were they to surrender the trans to science, they would lose their savior status and be just another guilty white person in need of accountability.

“The Pink-shirted Ladies of Lindsay are the epitome of this spirit as it moves past childbearing age and settles into empty high-rise apartments. If Lindsay is guilty of murder, so are they, and they know it. Progressive women alone account for more than 57% of abortions, yet they represent less than 1/3 of the female population.

“These aging women have now hit their 40s and 50s, and they have only become more committed to violence as a means of political persuasion. They must, I think, sense a world that comes to see the nature of their murder-justifying lies will soon remove them from power, or worse. At this point, they have everything to lose and nothing to gain if they surrender, for losing means losing everything, and winning is all that matters now.

“They have engaged in decades of child murder and political corporate assassinations, and a world that rejects progressivism will soon not only reject them, but it will also prosecute them. They won’t be prosecuted for murdering the unborn, they will be prosecuted for committing treason, child abuse, and racist, sexist, hetero-phobic discrimination.

“Their habit of evil has caused them to go all in on that same evil, by any means necessary, for the good of their high-rise apartments.

“We are seeing the final desperate push by the white woman progressive army to hold on to their power. They must fight off their victims, the American people, and the disenfranchised classes they’ve ‘served,’ classes now ready to throw their saviors out.”

Our Final Thought in that same issue, by Bill Collier, was about anchoring yourself in times of great ideological uncertainty. What we see here is a fundamental break with basic reality by a significant percentage of our population. This group holds great administrative power in most “American” institutions.

So many of our readers, and their family and friends, find themselves still trapped in institutions controlled by progressives; some are even public-school teachers attempting to preserve some semblance of Americanism in a system increasingly hostile to them.

Bill Collier wrote in his Final Thought, “Becoming aware of your own paradigms, and how they may contrast or align with others, is essential to navigating your path through the uncertainty and chaos we have faced (and will most likely continue to face for the foreseeable future).”

When do we fight defiantly within those institutions and where must you hold your fire?

To understand that question, you must first understand what is most essential to your belief system. To understand that you must understand what your core belief system really is.

Here are some resources that, in total, can give you a starting point for plumblining your own beliefs. From there, you can act more confidently, and with more courage, once you choose to act defiantly against the progressive state.

  • The Plumb Line – New Life – This is an essay about how to plumbline your own belief with scripture. This assumes you have already plumblined your own belief that scripture is your primary source for wisdom.
  • How to Chane Core Beliefs: Evidence-Based Strategies – HealthSpectra – This is a material approach to plumblining belief, so be cautious in how you approach this if you are Christian. Yet even for the Christian, there is practical value contained here, so long as you frame it within the boundaries of God’s Word.
  • How I Discovered My Core Beliefs (And How You Can Find Yours – Dr. Paul McCarthy – This essay points you to therapy, but within it is a good guide for how to identify what your core beliefs are.
  • Own Your beliefs – Under the Ancient Oaks – John Beckett – Christians beware, this is a self-confessed “pagan” writing here. He also uses the word “own,” which we assume is not actually possible for beings of limited understanding. This is why we say, “steward your beliefs,” not own them. Yet, even as God used evil for good through Pharoah and the 10 sons of Jacob who sold their brother into slavery, so too can you find good things in this essay. There are basic principles here that can help you determine what in you is stewarded and what in you has been blindly assumed.

One principle in the last article that is more important than all others is “You don’t have to figure out everything yourself,” which could be amended to include, “nor can you.”