01a Apocalyptic

Iran-Backed Proxy Group Launches Ground Offensive Aimed At Further Disrupting Global Shipping– trendingpoliticsnews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Yemen’s Houthi militants — an Iran-backed group that has controlled large swaths of the country’s northwest for more than a decade — have launched a renewed offensive aimed at taking control of a vital Red Sea port.

Yemen has been divided by civil war since 2014, when Houthi forces from the country’s north seized the capital city of Sanaa. The Houthis, a Zaydi Shia movement that formed in the 1990s, now administer most of what was historically North Yemen. This includes Sanaa, the densely populated highlands, and the Red Sea port of Hodeidah.

This accounts for the majority of Yemen’s population.

The internationally recognized government, supported by Saudi Arabia and based mainly in the south, holds Aden, much of the east and south, and the oil-producing area around Marib. Taiz, one of Yemen’s largest cities, remains split. Front lines changed little after a 2022 nationwide truce until fighting intensified in 2026.

The Houthis’ current holdings give them a long coastline on the Red Sea and positions from which they can reach the Bab al-Mandab Strait, the narrow passage connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden.

Earlier this month, the Houthis opened a ground offensive in western Taiz governorate. The operation targeted roads linking the city of Taiz to the government-held port of Mokha and sought to move closer to high ground overlooking approaches to Bab al-Mandab.

Clashes have been the heaviest in years, with more than 300 combatants and some civilians reported killed. Government forces later recaptured parts of Hays district in Hodeidah province and some heights west of Taiz, while Houthi units cut the Taiz–Mokha road at least temporarily.

Russia Orders Closures of German Consulate and Cultural Centers in Tit-for-Tat Move– www.themoscowtimes.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Monday it was shuttering the German consulate in St. Petersburg and German cultural centers across the country.

The closures were announced in retaliation for Germany’s decision last week to close the Russian consulate in Bonn and a Russian cultural center in Berlin after its government blamed Moscow for an attempted drone attack at Leipzig/Halle Airport last month.

Moscow gave diplomats and employees at the German Consulate General in St. Petersburg until Sept. 18 to cease operations and leave Russia.

Staff at Germany’s Goethe-Institut cultural center branches in Moscow, St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg were given until this Sunday.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said it summoned Germany’s ambassador in Moscow to inform him about the retaliatory decisions.

“It was the German authorities who once again provoked a new spiral of escalation in bilateral relations. Full responsibility for the consequences lies entirely with the German government,” the Russian ministry said in a statement.

President Vladimir Putin accused Germany of planting evidence in order to blame Moscow for the early August incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport.

On Sunday, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov claimed Berlin’s accusations against Moscow amounted to “an effective declaration of war against us.”

Lavrov said last week that Moscow would respond to the closure of its cultural center in Berlin by closing the Goethe-Institut cultural centers across Russia.

Russia’s first Goethe-Institut opened in Moscow in 1992, soon after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

OMISSION: Networks SILENT on Canada-China Military Talks– www.newsbusters.org
News Source

EXCERPT:

The Elitist Media evening news continue their mission on trade, acting as spokespeople for the Canadian prime minister instead of reporting the full scope of US-Canada relations that led to the breakdown at the negotiating table. Over the weekend and through today, an alarming omission emerges.

It appears that the media insist on glossing over the influence that China may have over Canada. In this case, we are only finding out about a high-level security meeting because China disclosed it. Per the Toronto Star:

As the Carney government pursues deeper relations with Beijing, the Chinese government reports it held a “candid” exchange on military issues with Canadian officials earlier this month.

The meeting – which Beijing said took place in Canada on Sept. 4 – followed years of diplomatic strain and is raising concerns among Conservatives, who reject the idea of military co-operation with China.

China’s defence ministry revealed the two countries held their fifth defence co-ordination dialogue last week. Canada’s Defence Department confirmed that report days later.

It’s worth noting that the countries’ military meetings were suspended in 2018 after the Trudeau administration arrested Huawei’s CEO. Their resumption at this particular juncture seems highly questionable. 

Even more questionable is the Elitist Media’s refusal to so much as mention China- whether it’s the military meeting or Canada’s insistence on laundering dumped Chinese steel as their own, which sunk the trade negotiations to begin with.

ABC World News Tonight addressed Canada only within the context of the retaliatory tariffs imposed by Canada. Rachel Scott being Rachel Scott, she made sure to close by quoting Prime Minister Mark Carney.  

 

 

ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT

9/8/26

6:39 PM

RACHEL SCOTT: Tonight, Americans are also feeling the impact of President Trump’s trade war with Canada. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney imposing tariffs on $20 billion worth of American goods after President Trump imposed steep tariffs on Canadian goods, Carney saying tonight “we relied too much on one economic partner and it’s clear that time is over.” David.

DAVID MUIR: Rachel Scott on the breaking developments tonight. Rachel, thank you.

What’s remarkable about ABC’s Canada reporting, tacked on at the end of their White House roundup, is that there isn’t even a mention of President Trump’s proposed ban against Bombardier aircraft- let alone China. The reporting was narrowly focused on the Canadian point of view, as is normally the case on the most Trump-deranged of the Elite Media broadcast networks. 

CBS’s Canada reporting on the Evening News was slightly better. There was at least a mention of Bombardier, but still no mention of China.

 

 

CBS EVENING NEWS

9/8/26

6:43 PM

TONY DOKOUPIL: Canadian tariffs took effect today and about $20 billion of U.S. goods, the latest escalation in a trade war with no clear end. Here’s our Chief White House Correspondent, Nancy Cordes.

NANCY CORDES: Canada made good on its threat today, imposing hefty new tariffs on U.S. dairy, steel, aluminum and appliances after trade talks broke down last month.

MARK CARNEY: We can’t let American goods into Canada tariff free, while they charge our companies to export them.

CORDES: The tariffs apply to just a slice of U.S. goods. But the risk is a spiral of retaliation, reminiscent of president trump’s trade war with China last year.

DONALD TRUMP: Canada has taken advantage of the U.S., they have ripped us off for years and now we are turning the tables.

CORDES: At Detroit Axle in Michigan, the CEO says the cross-border tit-for-tat is already driving up his costs.

MIKE MUSEINESH: I’ve imported a million dollars worth of product, once upon a time we paid the government $25,000 in tariffs. Now it went up to $725,000 in tariffs. Overnight.

CORDES: Canada is America’s second-largest trading partner and their economies are closely intertwined. On Sunday, Trump posted a cartoon image of himself checking Canada’s prime minister with a hockey stick. And he threatened to ban the sale of Canadian Bombardier business jets. Bombardier pointed out that the company works with 2800 U.S. suppliers and makes its wings in Texas, flight control components in California. It buys engines from Arizona and communications equipment from Iowa. 

A Kansas Republican, Senator Jerry Moran, even reached out to The White House to make sure that Trump knows Bombardier supports more than 1000 jobs in Wichita. It’s yet another sign, Tony, that Trump’s party may not share his appetite for another trade war, especially in an election year.

DOKOUPIL: That is true, Nancy. Thank you very much.

NBC didn’t even bother with a report. Meanwhile, the public continues to get less than half the story of the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and Canada. 

The Elitist Media are making sure that this continues to be the case, even if it means suppressing Canada’s military rapprochement with America’s main geostrategic rival.


Seattle Police Chief Calls Shooters “Trigger Pullers”– www.louderwithcrowder.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Watch Louder with Crowder every weekday at 11:00 AM Eastern, only on Rumble Premium!

Check out our Election 2026 Dashboard to keep track ot the upcoming midterms!

Even if we must be politically correct to those committing crimes, which we certainly should not be, why can’t the left make an exception for shooters who disregard human life? Because, in whatever pursuit that is, Interim Seattle Police Chief Andre Sayles has renamed shooters “trigger pullers” because of BLM or whatever.

This is objectively stupid and even more proof that the left prioritizes the feelings of criminals, including the ones who disregard the value of human life, over public safety. There should be more outrage over this.

According to Fox 13:

A violent 24-hour stretch in Seattle left three people dead and three others injured following three separate shooting incidents in and around the Belltown neighborhood.

Addressing potential staffing strains, Sayles said, “That’s something I have to look at. I haven’t really dove into what the staffing numbers looked like and if that was the case, then we will do what we need to do as a department to make sure that they are not overwhelmed.”

What a foolish response. It is his job to know the staffing numbers. He cannot even be bothered to do the bare minimum. What a disgrace this man is.

“We have officers in these dedicated areas. They’re a block or two away, and it’s one of those incidents where we respond to violence on a daily basis,” Sayles said. “It’s not like we can be there and stop it. But our goal is to be there and stop it.”

Maybe one day people like Sayles will fight for public safety the way he does for the feelings of evil losers, but until then, this is the best he can do. To call this a slap in the face to law-abiding Americans does not even begin to describe this absurdity.

– YouTube www.youtube.com


Watch: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Accidentally Admit They Made Their Decision Based on the Wrong Criteria– www.westernjournal.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

After Friday’s mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, three jurors have come forward revealing how they saw the outcome — and their perspective is just as bad as you would imagine.

Clancy was on trial for the deaths of her three children in January 2023. Her defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, argued she should not be held criminally responsible due to postpartum depression and psychosis. A mistrial was declared after one juror held out against the rest, refusing to retreat from the charges against her.

Now, we’re hearing from three women who saw it differently and gave an interview to WBTS — Paula Devlin, Roni Carlson, and Kellie Farina.

Their comments showed they were completely clueless and favored Clancy for reasons that had nothing to do with the law.

WBTS posted the interview to YouTube on Tuesday. Farina called the prosecution’s opening statement “harsh,” and said she did not like that they did not present character witnesses for Clancy. “You’re presenting all these medical professionals, but nobody’s presenting for the prosecution, a woman, a mother of three children.”

“I found it to be biased right out of the gate.”

Should Lindsay Clancy have been convicted of murder?

Why would the prosecution need to talk about her character?

Reddington admitted she killed three children. Would talking about her role as a mother before killing three children completely excuse that completely evil act?

What does “bias” have to do with anything? They are the prosecution. They are trying to prove she murdered her children.

“There is no compassion in this courtroom right now,” Farina recalled, apparently forgetting that compassion was not shown to the children Clancy killed.

When Devlin was asked if the prosecution said anything she considered in her decision, she gave a blunt “no.”

Related:

A Lindsay Clancy-Inspired Murder? Hours Before Boy, 2, Was Found Hanging from Rafter, Mom Was Discussing Clancy Online: Court Docs

On the other side, all three women could not stop swooning over Reddington. It was not because of the legality of his defense. They just seemed to like him.

Carlson recalled laughing at Reddington, saying his demeanor was “funny,” adding that “he was entertaining, which was good because we needed some of that.”

Devlin noted he was both “arrogant and entertaining,” before Farina added “but compassionate,” to which Devlin agreed.

“His compassion toward Lindsay was amazing,” she added.

Again, none of this should have anything to do with a murder trial and the facts presented.

It is clear these women went off of their emotions and were ready to let a child killer go free.

All three of them should be embarrassed to admit these things.

It is further proof that the one holdout juror was possibly the only sane voice during deliberations.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.

Tags:

, , , , , , , , , , ,


Nancy Pelosi Disclosed a Multi-Million Dollar AI Investment Just Weeks Before the Stock Blew Up– www.westernjournal.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi disclosed a multimillion-dollar investment last month in an artificial intelligence company whose stocks exploded in value soon after.

Pelosi’s husband Paul invested in Bloom Energy, a California-based company that provides fuel-cell technology and power systems aimed at meeting the enormous electricity demands of AI data centers.

According to a financial transaction report Pelosi signed Aug. 21, her household made several Bloom Energy purchases in late July.

The transactions included 10,000 shares purchased July 24, along with 100 call options, according to reporting from the New York Post. Another 5,000 shares and 100 additional call options were purchased July 28.

The disclosed value ranges put the combined transactions at a minimum of roughly $3 million, although the actual amount could have been as much as $12 million, because congressional financial disclosure forms use broad dollar ranges.

The July 24 purchases came after Bloom Energy’s stock had suffered a significant decline.

Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from buying and selling stocks?

Then came July 28.

That was the same day Bloom Energy reported extremely strong earnings, with annual revenue growth of 165 percent, according to the Post.

Bloom Energy’s stock subsequently took off.

Then, on Sept. 4, another major development arrived: Bloom Energy was announced as a new addition to the S&P 500.

The company is scheduled to join the benchmark index Sept. 21, alongside Everpure and Illumina.

Bloom Energy shares surged following the announcement, with the stock gaining nearly 40 percent over a five-day period, according to the Post.

Related:

Nancy Pelosi Is Attempting to Sabotage the Front-Runner to Replace Her in Congress: Report

By Tuesday, Bloom Energy shares were trading around $282.50, compared with $184.89 on July 24, the day of the first Pelosi household purchase.

That’s a striking move in a matter of weeks.

And it makes the timing of the disclosure noteworthy.

Pelosi’s office has said the former speaker does not own stocks and had no knowledge of or subsequent involvement in the transactions.

The trades were made by her husband and reported through the congressional disclosure system as transactions involving a spouse.

In an article about the transactions, financial writer Rich Duprey of 24/7 Wall Street  dubbed Pelosi “the queen of capital gains.”

“Pelosi’s trading record in Congress has consistently outpaced the S&P 500 and even Warren Buffett over comparable stretches, fueling suspicion that lawmakers with committee-level oversight enjoy an informational edge,” Duprey observed.

The New York Post said Pelosi “has faced heated blowback for her family’s trading activity — racking up a 65% return on her portfolio in 2023 while her venture capitalist husband made $38 million worth of stock trades in the weeks leading up to President Trump’s inauguration.”

Duprey noted that multiple bills to ban stock trading by members of Congress have been introduced, but they’ve all stalled.

The Democratic former House Speaker’s trades have been so notable that in 2023, GOP Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri introduced one such bill that he dubbed the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments Act – or the PELOSI Act.

Hawley later met with Democrats and agreed to change the name of the bill to the HONEST Act — Halting Ownership and Non-Ethical Stock Transactions — which allowed enough Democratic support to advance the bill out of committee in July 2025.

Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.


Ukrainian army carries out 53 attacks on DPR in past day, kills civilian – Military & Defense– tass.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

DONETSK, September 9. /TASS/. The Ukrainian military carried out 53 attacks on the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) over the past day, killing one civilian and injuring 13 others, the regional government’s department for recording Ukraine’s war crimes said in a statement.

“Fifty-three attacks by the Ukrainian armed forces were recorded. One civilian was reported dead, and 13 others were injured,” the statement reads.

The attacks damaged five residential buildings, several diesel locomotives and cars, as well as public transport vehicles and trucks, and six civilian infrastructure facilities.

In addition, the department also received further information about two civilians killed and seven injured on August 25, September 4 and 7.


Elitist Media: Are We Going to ‘Survive’ Destructive Donald Trump?– www.newsbusters.org
News Source

EXCERPT:

As the midterm elections get closer, the elitist media is turning up their hate machine to stoke their audiences into an anti-Trump frenzy. 

MS NOW’s Joe Scarborough fearmongered that President Donald Trump was tearing down institutions “brick by brick” that keep Americans safe as he questioned: “Are we gonna survive?” 

Scarborough’s MS NOW partner Mika Brzezinski claimed that Trump’s ICE agents were Nazi “shock troops” that are gunning down Americans.  

This past month also saw podcaster Jennifer Welch agitate against Trump and his supporters: “They are dismantling our country. They are opening up concentration camps in the United States of America.” 

MS NOW and PBS contributor Jonathan Capehart gloomily warned: “Trump is determined to destroy what makes America great.” 

The leftist elitists in the entertainment industry took potshots too. Comedian Rosie O’Donnell (who fled to Ireland to escape Trump) returned to guest-host ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!. She used that show’s opening monologue to attack the President for bringing “fascism and the measles” back.  

ABC’s The View co-host Whoopi Goldberg urged her anti-Trump audience to vote in the midterms because: “Our lives literally depend on this.” 

The following are the most obnoxious outbursts from leftist journalists and celebrities over the last month:

 

Joe Scarborough: Are We Going to “Survive” Trump and His Nazi “Shock Troops?”

 

 

“You see what’s happened at the DOD. You see what’s happened at the Justice Department. You see what’s happened at the National Institutes of Health. All of these, all of these institutions that have been built up to protect Americans and to extend American power and safety across the globe – being torn down brick by brick, piece by piece, by this Trump Administration. And the question people have is, are we gonna survive?”
— Co-host Joe Scarborough on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 24.

 

 

“You’re actually going to use shock troops in the United States of America to go after not only people who are immigrants, but also Americans themselves. Time and time again, Americans are getting caught up in this, getting gunned down in the streets of America. And you look at Hispanics….They’re having to carry their papers now….This is what happened in the Soviet Union. This is what happened in Nazi Germany.” 
— Co-host Joe Scarborough on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 13.  

 

Mika Brzezinski Attacks “Backwards, Un-American” and “Sick” Trump Immigration Policy

 

 

“Are, again, we going after the worst of the worst, or are we just going after people to create a level of fear out there where laws can be broken, people can be detained for months, and children have to show up alone for the detention hearings? The list goes on as to how backwards, un-American, and sick this is.”
— Co-host Mika Brzezinski on MS NOW’s Morning Joe, August 25.

 

Jim Acosta Claims Ambassadors Keep Telling Him That Trump Era Reminds Them of 1930s Germany 

 

 

“I was at a diplomatic function. I had an ambassador to one of our allies in Europe,come up to me and say, ‘What’s happening right now, Jim, reminds me of Germany in the 1930s.’ And there was another ambassador from another U.S. ally standing next to this ambassador, and that ambassador nodded, yep, yep, and they were both saying the same thing.”
— Former CNN correspondent Jim Acosta on The Jim Acosta Show podcast, August 29.

 

Chris Matthews: Trump’s Not Hitler, He’s Mussolini 

 

 

“We can’t accuse anybody of being Hitler because there’s only one Hitler, fortunately. There’s only one guy that killed all the people and created a war that cost the lives of 50 million people. And not just the holocaust; that war everywhere. But I think he [Donald Trump] is Mussolini. I think he loves being – having big tributes, pretty uniforms, monuments to himself.”
— Former MSNBC Hardball host Chris Matthews on MS NOW’s Alex Witt Reports, August 29.

 

Kristen Welker Runs Interference for Leftist Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed 

 

 

“Let me ask you, you describe Dr. El-Sayed as extreme; your Senate colleague Tommy Tuberville has called him a terrorist. Senator Ted Cruz said El-Sayed wants, quote, Sharia law. To be fair, there’s no evidence to support those claims. Do you believe those attacks go too far, Senator?”
— Moderator Kristen Welker to Sen. Jim Banks on NBC’s Meet the Press, August 9.

 

 

“There is no evidence that [Abdul] El-Sayed supports any terrorist organization. I just want to read this. A Washington Post analysis online found that, quote, ‘nearly one in three posts about El-Sayed from right-wing figures mentioned Islam, Muslims, or sharia.’ Are Republicans trying to scare voters based on the fact that El-Sayed would be the first Muslim senator?”
— Moderator Kristen Welker to Sen. Tim Scott on NBC’s Meet the Press, August 23.

 

CNN’s Audie Cornish: “A Colin Powell” Wouldn’t Be Able to Rise in Pete Hegseth’s Military

 

 

“There’s something about calling it a meritocracy and then going around saying, ‘Based on your looks, vibes, your identity, you’re out.’ And I think that’s been very disturbing to see, certainly as a black American watching the history of your, the military being whitewashed, when so many people in the community actually were educated, mobilized, and came up through the U.S. military. I don’t think I would look at this military today and be able to say the same thing. I don’t think a Colin Powell rises in this military.”
— Host Audie Cornish after playing a montage clip of Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, as aired on CNN This Morning, September 3. 

 

Jonathan Capehart: “Donald Trump is Determined to Destroy What Makes America Great”

 

 

“Donald Trump is determined to destroy what makes America great: our democracy, our pluralism, and the educational and cultural institutions that thrive when people can freely express themselves without fear. His fight against the Smithsonian Institution is escalating because of what Reuters describes as, quote, Trump’s ‘displeasure with what he called the institution’s excessive focus on how bad slavery was.’…The Smithsonian relies heavily on federal support, which means it’s vulnerable to the whims of a man who made history as the first convicted criminal to be elected president and let that cook for a moment.”
— Substitute host Jonathan Capehart on MS NOW’s The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, September 4.

 

Republicans Set a “Health Care Bomb” On the American People 

 

 

Anchor Geoff Bennett: “Jonathan, what are Democrats offering voters and what would they do if they win the midterms?”
Contributor Jonathan Capehart: “Democrats have been talking about affordability since, what is this, ’26, 20 – since this time last year. I believe it was last year, maybe it was ’24, but preparing people for the health care bomb that Republicans were about to set on the American people.”
— PBS News Hour, September 4.

 

Karoline Leavitt Became the “Most Shameless Liar” That Trump Has Ever Had as Press Secretary

 

 

 “Kayleigh McEnany, she was going for the Gold in the Lie Olympics but – and I thought coming into this second term, when they announced Karoline Leavitt as the new White House press secretary, I thought – you know – I don’t know – is she ready for primetime? She’s gonna have to do those special exercises that they do inside the Trump White House to really hone their skills at lying to the American people. But by golly, she put in the work. And she has, she has shown some results! She is, I think, by far the biggest and most effective and most shameless liar that Donald Trump has ever had as White House press secretary.” 
— Former CNN correspondent Jim Acosta on his podcast The Jim Acosta Show, August 12. 

 

Gayle King to Hillary Clinton on Leftist Icon Gloria Steinem: I Was In Awe of Her

 

 

“I woke up to this news. I just heard it an hour ago, and I felt like I’d been kicked in the stomach. I wonder if you could share your remembrances about Gloria Steinem….It is something, Madam Secretary, when you meet your heroes, and they’re everything that you think that they would be, I was in awe the first time I met her.” 
— Co-host Gayle King to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on CBS Mornings, September 3.

 

Peter Alexander Gushes About Steinem to Nancy Pelosi: You Two Advanced Equal Rights, Despite Having to Fight Through Three Republican Presidents!

 

 

 “You and Miss [Gloria] Steinem fought through three Republican presidencies to advance not just women’s rights, but equal rights for everyone.”
— Host Peter Alexander to Rep. Nancy Pelosi on MS NOW’s State of Play, September 3. 

 

NY Times Lavished Praise on Leftist Gloria Steinem, Savaged Conservative Phyllis Schlafly 

“Gloria Steinem, the feminist crusader who, in galvanizing the modern women’s movement, helped millions of women develop a sense of self-worth and gain a measure of equality at home, at work and in society at large, died on Wednesday at her home in New York City.”
— New York Times Obituary writer Katharine Q. Seelye in September 3, 2026 obit of Gloria Steinem.

VS.

“In her time, Mrs. [Phyllis] Schlafly was one of the most polarizing figures in American public life, a self-described housewife who displayed a moral ferocity reminiscent of the ax-wielding prohibitionist Carry Nation.”
— New York Times Obituary writer Douglas Martin in September 5, 2016 obit of Phyllis Schlafly. 

 

Jennifer Welch: Trump and His Supporters Are “Dismantling Our Country,” “Opening Up Concentration Camps”

 

 

“You should hold no punches in critiquing Donald Trump and all of the people in this country. You should critique the 77 million people that voted for him. You should go full tilt because it’s dark; it’s awful. They are dismantling our country. They are opening up concentration camps in the United States of America.”
— Former reality show star Jennifer Welch on her I’ve Had It podcast, August 31.

 

MAGA Can Only Offer “Fear-Mongering, Scare-Mongering, Xenophobia and Racism”

 

 

“There is nothing radical about not taking corporate money. There is nothing radical about wanting health care for everybody. There is nothing radical about having a politics that is more empathetic, inclusive, and accepting. MAGA is none of those things. The only thing they can offer, the American public right now, is fear-mongering, scare-mongering, xenophobia, and racism, and Islamophobia, and it has worked for a very long time since 9/11.”|
— Host Jennifer Welch on the I’ve Had It podcast, September 1.

 

Whoopi Pushes The View’s Anti-Trump Audience to Vote: “Our Lives Literally Depend On This” 

 

 

“This is now on all of us, every one of us, doesn’t matter your color, doesn’t matter your sex, you want it to change, you’re the only one that can do it….Find out where you can vote and help your elders get to the places to vote. Help everybody you can to get out this vote because our lives literally depend on this.”
— Co-host Whoopi Goldberg on ABC’s The View, September 8. 

 

Rosie O’Donnell Fled to Ireland Because She Thought About “All the People in Nazi Germany Who Didn’t Get Out Early Enough”

 

 

“When I told my friends, they’re like, ‘We can’t get you to go to Cancun. What do you mean you’re moving to Ireland?’ And so, you know, I was sure after I read that book, I thought about all the people in Nazi Germany who didn’t get out early enough. And I thought, I don’t want that to be my truth. And I also don’t want to be engrossed in every detail of what he’s [Donald Trump] saying and doing every moment, which is what happens when you’re here in the United States.”
— Former ABC’s The View co-host and comedian Rosie O’Donnell on The Tangle with Kyle Ridley podcast, August 11.

 

Rosie: Trump Brought Me Back, Just like the Measles and Fascism 

 

 

“This has been kind of a strange experience for me, because all of a sudden I’m re-famous. I’m back in the spotlight all thanks to President Oompa J. Loompa, who is watching us this evening from inside a catering cart. You know, I couldn’t have done it without you, sweetie. You brought me back, just like you did with fascism and the measles.”
— Comedian and former ABC’s The View co-host Rosie O’Donnell guest-hosting on ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live!, August 18.

 

HBO Host John Oliver: Reagan Was a “Messy Bitch,” the “Forrest Gump of Societal Ills”

 

 

Host John Oliver: “Let’s start with the fact that the basic concept of a fetus being its own person with distinct rights is nothing new — in fact, here’s one of its major proponents, laying out the argument in 1984.”
Clip of Ronald Reagan: “I believe that until and unless someone can establish that the unborn child is not a living human being, then that child is already protected by the Constitution, which guarantees life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to all of us.”
Oliver: “Yeah! There he is! It seems you cannot trace the source of any modern problem without a cameo from this messy bitch. He truly is the Forrest Gump of societal…


WATCH: Families Plead for Mamdani to Stay Away from 9/11 Memorial After He Says He’ll Attend Event Despite Their Wishes: “He’s Serving Himself”– www.thegatewaypundit.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Giovanni Galante, who lost his wife Grace on 9/11, tells Zohran Mamdani, “We really want us to be left alone”

Families of the victims of 9/11 gathered on Tuesday in Manhattan to send a clear message to New York Mayor , telling him to stay away from their 9/11 memorial service. 

As Mamdani plans to defy the families’ wishes, Giovanni Galante, the organizer of a petition to bar Mamdani from the event, said they just want “to be left alone” to mourn the 25th anniversary of their losses.

“He just wants to be there because he wants to be there,” said Charles Wolf, noting that “This mayor is not serving us; he’s serving himself.”

The petition, launched by families of the victims and signed by over 100,000 people, describes the event as “not simply a public ceremony,” but “a deeply personal day of mourning.”

“The presence of individuals whose words or associations are perceived as conflicting with the solemn purpose of the event risks detracting from that focus and causing additional pain,” it reads, giving examples of why sympathizer Mamdani is not welcome.

Concerns have been raised about Mr. Mamdani’s public positions, associations, and responses to rhetoric that many perceive as hostile to these shared values. These include:

  •           A perceived reluctance to clearly and unequivocally condemn phrases such as “globalize the intifada,” which many interpret as endorsing or normalizing violence.
  •           Support for, or associations with, individuals whose public statements or records are viewed by concerned family members as dismissive of American institutions or insufficiently critical of extremist ideologies.
  •           Mr. Mamdani’s own father, whom he has acknowledged as having shaped his views, penned a book shortly after 9/11 in which he argued that suicide bombers should be “understood as a feature of modern political violence rather than stigmatized as a mark of barbarism.” He also argued that there was a moral equivalence between the and al-Qaeda.
  •           Mr. Mamdani has praised Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj, who has been linked to radical Islam, was named as an alleged co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and served as a character witness for the “Blind Sheikh,” who was convicted in 1995 of plotting terror attacks against the United States.
  •            Mr. Mamdani has blamed the United States for radicalizing Anwar al-Awlaki, an al-Qaeda propagandist linked to the 9/11 hijackers. Critics have likened this to blaming victims rather than perpetrators.
  •           Mr. Mamdani appointed Ramzi Kassem, who previously represented Ahmed al-Darbi (convicted in an al-Qaeda tanker bombing plot), as New York City’s chief counsel.
  •           Mr. Mamdani has endorsed candidates such as Aber Kawas, who described 9/11 as an attack “a couple of people did in the context of U.S. capitalism, racism, white supremacy, and Islamophobia,” and who also expressed sympathy for Ahmed Ferhani, who pleaded guilty to plotting to blow up a Manhattan synagogue.
  •           Mr. Mamdani recently stood with DSA primary winner Darializa Aria Chevalier, who once tweeted, “I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me.”

Still, Mamdani declared that he will “proudly honor the families, the survivors, the first responders, forever impacted by that horrific terror attack by standing alongside them at this year’s 9/11 commemoration,” the Gateway Pundit reported.

On Tuesday, family members, first responders, and elected officials made their final pleas for the mayor not to attend.

Giovanni Galante, who lost his wife Grace in the terrorist attack and organized the petition, said at the press conference, “I’m here to honor my beautiful wife and to have this man not attend our service. The main purpose is just that we don’t believe in what he believes in, and we really want us to be left alone.”

“The purpose of this whole thing, this 25th anniversary, is for our, you know, victims and us survivors to blend in and pray that day for all the families, not have a circus around us,” he said.

Monica Iken, who lost her husband, Michael, stated, “It’s a blessing that we can go to this memorial and honor our loved ones and not just their death. So that’s a very important thing.”

“I support the families. I feel like if the families really feel, if we feel, that we don’t want someone at our world-class memorial museum that’s sacred and hallowed, we feel that that person should respect our wishes,” Iken said.

She further noted that Mamdani “wasn’t even here” during 9/11/2001. “He was 10, he wasn’t in this country, and I think he should really respect us,” she added. “Just let us have our peace, our memorial, to really understand why we’re here. We’re honoring our loved ones.”

“I want to make clear that our petition is not about Mayor Mamdani’s religion or where he came from. It is strictly about the policies that he has today,” said Cheri Sparacio, the wife of 9/11 victim Tom Sparacio. She then pointed to Mamdani’s support for Hasan Piker, who said America deserved 9/11, and his hiring of Ramzi Kassem, who once represented Ahmed al-Darbi, an al-Qaeda operative convicted in the 2002 bombing of a French oil tanker and the brother-in-law of 9/11 Pentagon hijacker Khalid al-Mihdhar.

“Yes, he was a nine-year-old boy when 9/11 happened, but it is today that he stands with people like Hasan Piker. It is today that he hires people like Ramzi Kassem. It is today that he stands with an imam that was a co-conspirator of the 93 bombing. That is what we object to,” she said.

Jeannette Puccio-Pick, whose father was killed in the attack when she was nine years old, put it simply, saying, “My message to Mayor Mamdani is: Dude, we don’t want you to come.”

“We don’t want a mayor who only wants to be there for the publicity. This mayor is not serving us; he’s serving himself. We are asking, respectfully, that he not show up,” said Charles Wolf, whose wife, Katherine, was killed while working in the North Tower on 9/11.

“Even though there is going to be other politicians there, these are the politicians that helped us, pushed beneficial laws through, and literally held our hand during that time. Mayor Mamdani has not shown any of that, none of it. He just wants to be there because he wants to be there. So, we are asking him to respect the fact that trauma is revived during the ceremony. It is a private ceremony. It is not a public ceremony. Mayor Mamdani, please do not come.”

WATCH:

After the speeches, the reporters present had no questions for the families. There was no way for them to defend Mamdani.

Fox’s Harris Faulkner was in disbelief at the press’s refusal.

WATCH:

Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.


JUST IN: Lindsay Clancy Juror Makes Shocking Admission: ‘I Thought She Was Guilty’– trendingpoliticsnews.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

A juror who ultimately voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy has revealed she originally believed the Massachusetts mother was guilty and criminally responsible for killing her three young children.

The anonymous woman, identified by CBS Boston as juror No. 5, said her opinion changed during contentious deliberations that ended with an 11-1 deadlock and a mistrial last week.

The juror said she knew little about the nationally followed case before being selected because she does not regularly watch the news.

She entered deliberations leaning toward conviction.

‘Originally, I felt that she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it.’

Even after voting to acquit Clancy by reason of insanity, the juror acknowledged that she remains conflicted about the case.

‘Maybe I still believe that Clancy is guilty, in a certain way,’ she admitted.

Clancy, 36, is charged with killing her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, inside the family’s Duxbury home in January 2023.

She admitted strangling the children with exercise bands but pleaded not guilty, with her defense arguing that postpartum psychosis left her unable to appreciate the wrongfulness of her actions.

Prosecutors maintained that Clancy was criminally responsible and deliberately carried out the killings.

The anonymous juror said the evidence initially left her inclined to side with prosecutors, particularly the harrowing 911 call made by Clancy’s husband, Patrick, after discovering the children.

‘I will never be the same after that 911 call,’ the juror said.

The recording was played for jurors but has not been publicly released.

She also pushed back against online conspiracy theories accusing Patrick Clancy of killing the children and framing his wife.

‘If these people could have heard that visceral, blood-curdling scream,’ she said. ‘It was horrifying.’

But her assessment of Lindsay Clancy‘s criminal responsibility shifted as jurors reviewed the evidence and debated her mental condition.

RELATED: NEW: Lindsay Clancy Jurors Break Their Silence In Interview After Mistrial

‘I think this was a woman who was not mentally healthy, she was in the throes of a significant mental crisis,’ the juror said.

‘I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out, and this was the only option.’

She eventually concluded that prosecutors had not eliminated enough doubt for her to convict.

‘There was not a single moment throughout that presentation of that case that you could say, ‘Oh yep, 100 percent I’m certain she did it,” she recalled. ‘There is too much gray area.’

The juror also offered a dramatically different view of the lone holdout who prevented an acquittal.

Three other jurors who spoke publicly this week criticized the unidentified man for refusing to change his vote, but juror No. 5 said he was not the only person in the room who had dug in.

RELATED: Lindsay Clancy’s Attorney Sends Jaw-Dropping Message To Trump

‘This standalone juror was not the only one that was unwilling to see things from the other side, so I’m going to kind of defend that individual,’ she said.

‘There were some big personalities in that room, but at the end of the day, I feel like it just came down to an inability to move past your convictions.’

She said other jurors began trying to persuade the holdout early in the deliberations, with tensions eventually growing intense enough that arguments could reportedly be heard outside the jury room.

Foreperson Roni Carlson and jurors Kellie Farina and Paula Devlin have separately said the holdout acknowledged having reasonable doubt but still refused to return a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict.

Carlson recalled becoming optimistic that the jury had finally reached an agreement before the man again refused to acquit.

‘but I’m still not going to say she’s not guilty,’ Carlson recalled.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial Sept. 4 after more than a week of deliberations failed to produce a unanimous verdict.

The latest juror interview now reveals that the final 11-1 split did not necessarily reflect where every juror began. At least one woman who ultimately sided with Clancy entered the jury room believing she was guilty before changing her position after reviewing the case with the other jurors.

POLL: Do You Believe Transgenderism Is A Mental Illness?


Los Angeles Is Flooded With Government-Funded Non-Profits– thefederalist.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

Massive sums of money, washing into an endless system of creeks and gullies, diffusing and disappearing.

The Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, a county-city joint powers authority that has been largely abandoned by county officials over serious concerns about effectiveness, financial transparency, and basic operational competence, proudly says that it funds “more than 100 nonprofit partner agencies” in a single county.

To begin to understand what that giant system of non-profit corporations looks like in practice, look closely at a single example: Special Service for Groups (SSG). The Charity Navigator website describes SSG as an entity that performs a remarkably broad cluster of roles: “Provide behavioral health, support for older adults, social justice/anti hate, HIV/AIDS related, an extensive array of homeless, substance abuse and health access initiatives and services to vulnerable communities.”

Many divisions with different purposes live under SSG’s corporate umbrella. The Asian and Pacific Islander Forward Movement (APIFM) works within that local population on “community health and environmental justice issues,” for example, while Access to Prevention Advocacy Intervention & Treatment (APAIT) provides advocacy, education, and health services to “people at-risk for or living with HIV/AIDS.”

You can read about APAIT’s Trans Pride Gala here, as an example of their publicly funded work, and see a complete list of SSG’s divisions on the main SSG website (where they scroll across a banner near the top).

But SSG is becoming particularly important in homeless services, and is broadly funded as a homeless services agency. More about those details in a moment.

After its function, the next thing to understand about SSG is where the money comes from. In fiscal year 2025, which ended in June of that year, the organization had a little more than $264 million in revenue. You can find that number in their Form 990, the financial disclosure document a non-profit corporation has to file annually with the IRS. But if you open that document, keep scrolling down until you get to the sources of that cash. It’s on pg. 9, the “statement of revenue.” Screenshot:

Of $264 million in annual revenue, about $260 million comes from government grants, or about 98.5 percent of SSG’s total funding. As their audited financial statements show, about $60 million of that public funding comes in the form of federal grants, much of which has been “passed through” to SSG through state and local governments.

So in practice, SSG is a government agency without really being one, providing government-funded services as a private corporation that has no obligation to comply with transparency laws like the California Public Records Act or the state’s open meeting law for local governments. They spend public money under corporate transparency rules: private enterprise with government funds.

Still, SSG has some financial disclosure requirements as a non-profit corporation, and we can see on their Form 990 what they pay their top employees:

In its current form, SSG was created in September of 1993, from the bones of an older non-profit and a set of “restated” articles of incorporation.

You can scroll through twenty-five years of SSG’s financial history at ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer website. It’s a story of growth, then of rapid growth: In 2006, about $23 million in government grants (and $26 million overall); in 2016, about $53 million in government grants; and then, in 2019, after the Measure H sales tax increases for homeless services passed in 2017, a big jump to about $108 million in government grants.

Finally, as Los Angeles County voters passed the larger Measure A sales tax increase for homeless services in 2024, SSG’s annual revenue jumped in a single year by more than $50 million. You can go see that big jump for yourself, comparing fiscal year 2024 to fiscal year 2025 on the Nonprofit Explorer page for SSG. Also compare fiscal year 2023 to 2024, because they added almost $100 million in annual revenue in just three explosive years:

Around $167 million to $264 million, as a non-profit that had $26 million in revenue just 10 years ago.

As SSG has pushed more aggressively into the broad funding and delivery of homeless services, where a lot of public funding is available, its record has suggested that the non-profit may be growing beyond its expertise. With close to $8.5 million in city, state, and foundation funding, SSG now owns a former motel in South Los Angeles that it plans to convert into supportive housing for the homeless. Six years after the City of Los Angeles bought that property and passed it to SSG, a motel that was in operation and hosting guests when it was taken over now looks like this:

City officials have given SSG a few more years to find additional funding to begin the project, but for now a working motel has been turned into a stripped and gutted property with a security fence around it.

More controversially, SSG had a significant financial partnership for years with a Los Angeles businessman named Alexander Soofer, who is now awaiting trial in state and federal courts on a long list of fraud charges. Prosecutors allege that Soofer diverted $10 million in public funding that was intended for homeless services to his personal accounts, using the money to fund luxury travel and a $7 million house.

An interesting wrinkle in Soofer’s prosecution recently appeared in reporting from the Los Angeles news organization LAist, which pointed out for the first time that Soofer had two corporations with similar names: Abundant Blessings, a non-profit, and Abundant Blessings from Above, a for-profit corporation. Both LAHSA and SSG paid both of Soofer’s corporations with public funds to provide services like transitional housing to the homeless, but they don’t appear to have noticed that Soofer was using his for-profit corporation to collect homeless services funds. You can see this detail in SSG’s Form 990, for several years in a row. Here’s the most recent example, from the 2025 form:

For several years, SSG reported to the IRS that it was providing passed-through public funds to Abundant Blessings from Above, a 501(c)(3). But that was never true:

Distributing millions of dollars a year in public funds, they appear to have had no idea who they were paying.

The Federalist made a significant effort to discuss SSG’s use of public funds with SSG and LAHSA (which provides funding to SSG). The news media contact listed on SSG’s website, an executive at a private public relations firm, didn’t respond to messages, and an email message sent to SSG Executive Director Herbert Hatanaka was blocked by SSG’s email system. Finally, a reporter from The Federalist tried to visit SSG headquarters in person, but was denied access to the office.

LAHSA alone funds “more than 100 nonprofit partner agencies” in Los Angeles County. There’s one, with $260 million in annual taxpayer funding from all government sources, an emptied and gutted motel, and one of their major financial partners awaiting trial.



Students who use AI every day may be falling behind, while moderate users pull ahead– www.digitaltrends.com
News Source

EXCERPT:

I assumed more AI access might help students learn faster. However, a new OECD study dispels that misconception for me and everyone else who gave their children a paid version of AI chatbots, thinking it would help them through their educational journey. 

According to PISA 2025 data from 760,000 students in 91 countries, students who use AI daily score meaningfully worse on standardized tests than their peers. The full picture is more complicated than a simple ban would fix.

So what exactly does the data show?

Daily AI users trail their peers by up to 28 points on science tests. The gap, per the research, is equivalent to roughly a year and a half of schooling. However, don’t rush into believing that less AI use is automatically better. 

Students who use AI once or twice a week outscore both daily users and those who don’t use it at all. Those who’re using it to learn something are apparently performing better than those who use it to finish tasks faster. 

Students regularly asked to critique AI-generated answers in class saw science scores climb 13 points, which is about half a year of additional progress.

Why does heavy use backfire?

OECD’s Andreas Schleicher (via Bloomberg) frames the difference in a simplified manner. AI is most beneficial when it supports some mental effort. That could be learning something new or how to do something, rather than getting it done. 

A staggering 86% of students use AI for schoolwork at least once a year. However, their usage varies wildly by region. For instance, nearly 40% of Japanese students say they rarely touch it versus just 4% in Vietnam. 

Related policy frameworks are catching up fast, too. New York City just banned AI tools for elementary and middle schoolers. MIT says it needs to redesign coursework, especially since AI can complete most undergraduate assignments. 

If you’re a student reading this, using AI-powered chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini to learn new concepts, ask follow-up questions, and use it as a superhuman professor is the right approach. 


Stewart: ‘It Is a Contemptuous Position’ To Not Mandate Baking Gay Wedding Cakes– www.newsbusters.org
News Source

EXCERPT:

After taking all of August off, Comedy Central’s The Daily Show returned on Tuesday with host Jon Stewart welcoming Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to the show to promote his new book on helping Americans not hate each other as much. At one point Stewart questioned Cox’s commitment to the idea when he demanded to know why Cox hasn’t forced Utahans to bake cakes for same-sex weddings even if that would violate their religious beliefs.

The context for such a question was Utah making it illegal to fire someone for being gay but maintaining First Amendment protections for people such as wedding cake bakers. For Stewart, such a compromise was not good enough, “I think that it’s certainly an admirable effort. It is hard for me not to look at it as there is a vulnerable—there is a power disparity in that equation and that the gay community in Utah is not equivalent to the Christian community in Utah.”

 

 

Stewart further claimed, “You are asking a community of people whose humanity has not been recognized as total to accept that they will be—you will still be—we can’t fire you, but we will still view you as aberrant, and we will enshrine that in the law because it does—if you flip that and you say to somebody, ‘I will not bake a cake because you believe in Jesus for your wedding,’ I think you can see that that is a contemptuous position.”

Finally getting to something resembling a question, Stewart wondered, “And so asking a group that is traditionally less righted to accept a bargain for their humanity still strikes me fundamentally as—I don’t want to say contemptible, but boy, there are some synonyms that are hard for me—it is a hard one to swallow as a victory. Does that resonate in any way?”

Cox, who was the first conservative/Republican guest on a late night comedy show in 13 months, began to reply, “I mean, it resonates, but I don’t think that that was how it was viewed, and again, You can talk to them. I’ll let them have that conversation.”

Stewart then interrupted to joke that he won’t be doing that, “I’m not going to end up—I do one show a week, man! I spent my whole August reading this thing. Yeah.”

After the laughter from the audience died down, Cox resumed, “What I will say is those protections went both ways, and it’s not about contempt. It is about religious freedom, which is really important to people. You wouldn’t have to bake a cake for Christians if you didn’t want to. That is also included in the law. We’re not going to force you to do that piece. And yet at the time. Again, this was incredibly rare. It had never happened. Those types of protections in a red state, and it didn’t have to happen. That is the point.”

The last year has been defined by the late night comedy shows trying to portray themselves as the guardians of the First Amendment, but when it comes to defending the First Amendment rights of a common baker, Jon Stewart thinks the First Amendment is disposable.

Here is a transcript for the August 8 show:

Comedy Central The Daily Show

9/8/2026

11:44 PM ET

JON STEWART: I think that it’s certainly an admirable effort. It is hard for me not to look at it as there is a vulnerable—there is a power disparity in that equation and that the gay community in Utah is not equivalent to the Christian community in Utah.

And so the difficulty I have in that, just being honest—

SPENCER COX: Yeah.

STEWART: —is that you are asking a community of people whose humanity has not been recognized as total to accept that they will be—you will still be—we can’t fire you, but we will still view you as aberrant, and we will enshrine that in the law because it does—if you flip that and you say to somebody, “I will not bake a cake because you believe in Jesus for your wedding,” I think you can see that that is a contemptuous position.

And so asking a group that is traditionally less righted to accept a bargain for their humanity still strikes me fundamentally as—I don’t want to say contemptible, but boy, there are some synonyms that are hard for me—it is a hard one to swallow as a victory. Does that resonate in any way?

COX: I mean, it resonates, but I don’t think that that was how it was viewed, and again—

STEWART: Right. Fair enough.

COX: You can talk to them. I’ll let them have that conversation.

STEWART: I’m not going to end up—I do one show a week, man! I spent my whole August reading this thing. Yeah.

COX: What I will say is those protections went both ways, and it’s not about contempt. It is about religious freedom, which is really important to people. You wouldn’t have to bake a cake for Christians if you didn’t want to. That is also included in the law. We’re not going to force you to do that piece. And yet at the time—

STEWART: Yeah.

COX:  — again, this was incredibly rare. It had never happened. Those types of protections in a red state, and it didn’t have to happen. That is the point.


The ‘Woke Language’ Interim Seattle Police Chief Uses to Describe Shooters Is Not Going Over Well – RedState– redstate.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

 

Like many Democrat-run cities across the country, Seattle is a hot mess when it comes to combating crime, with city “leaders” often demanding hands-off approaches to things like confronting street thugs, repeat offenders, violent wacktivists, and the like.

Though this approach has been favored for some time now by the Democrats and socialists who hold all the power, Seattle’s openly socialist mayor, Katie Wilson, took things to a whole new level once she took office, making stupid and dangerous decisions like these, for example:

A United Nations committee is issuing a decree to white majority western countries to pay reparations to African descendants of slaves. Tops on that list were America and Britain. The committee insisted, “States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies.”

U.N. Committee Says 182 Countries Must Consider Reparations for Transatlantic Slave Trade › American Greatness– amgreatness.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

A United Nations committee is calling on countries, including the United States and United Kingdom, to provide reparations to people of African descent for the continuing effects of the transatlantic slave trade, potentially including financial compensation.

The U.N. Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination issued guidance Monday arguing that countries have present-day obligations under the legally binding 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination.

“States Parties must implement comprehensive reparatory measures for people of African descent, covering all aspects of remedies,” the committee said.

The guidance applies to the 182 countries that are parties to the convention, including the United States, United Kingdom, France and Portugal.

The committee’s position represents what it describes as a “paradigm shift” in the reparations debate. Rather than determining whether slavery violated international law when it occurred, the committee argues that governments have a current obligation to address racial inequalities it attributes to slavery and colonialism.

Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld is claiming Lawfare prosecutor Letitia James’ office is instructing their attorneys to find reasons to prosecute President Trump and his allies. Wiesenfeld claimed his supervisors told him “to find and pursue crimes committed by specific individuals and organizations affiliated with Donald Trump.”

Letitia James Whistleblower Exposes Anti-Trump Order to ‘Find Crimes’– slaynews.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

A prosecutor in New York Attorney General Letitia James’s office accused his supervisors of directing him to target President Donald Trump and affiliated individuals and companies first, then search for crimes afterward.

Assistant Attorney General Daniel Wiesenfeld reportedly sent an agency-wide email on Friday to blow the whistle on the order.

Wiesenfeld is alleging that his supervisor instructed him “to find and pursue crimes committed by specific individuals and organizations affiliated with Donald Trump.”

According to the Times Union, which obtained the message, Wiesenfeld said Investor Protection Bureau chief Shamiso Maswoswe directed him to investigate targets including “Trump himself, Truth Social, Hewlett Packard (DOJ approved merger) … without having a credible reason for targeting this organizations and individuals.”

The email was reportedly sent to hundreds of employees across the attorney general’s office.

However, the email was swiftly deleted from the agency’s servers.

Wiesenfeld then sent a follow-up message warning colleagues against using the office to pursue James’s political enemies.

The Chinese Communist Party has been allowed to set up propaganda outreach programs in 83 U.S. Colleges according to a report by Defending Education.

The report claims the program is called “The Young Envoys Scholarship,” which sends 50,000 U.S. students to study or visit China. The program is “run by the China Education Association for International Exchange, an organization guided by ‘Marxism-Leninism’ and Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism.”

Chinese government program at 83 U.S. colleges aims to ‘influence’ students: report– www.thecollegefix.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Program is run by ‘Marxism-Leninism’ organization with CCP ties

A Chinese government program at 83 U.S. colleges is part of an “ongoing effort … to influence American students’ perceptions of the communist country,” according to a recent report by a conservative watchdog group.

The Young Envoys Scholarship is an international exchange initiative launched by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2024 to bring 50,000 U.S. students to study or participate in cultural visits to China, according to the Defending Education report.

It is “run by the China Education Association for International Exchange, an organization guided by ‘Marxism-Leninism’ and Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism,” the report states.

Reagan Dugan, Director of Higher Education Initiatives at Defending Education, told The College Fix that the program is operating in American schools without students and families knowing its real agenda.

Dugan added that the program needs greater monitoring. “US oversight must apply the same diligence to American students traveling to China at the behest of the CCP that they do to foreign students studying in America,” she said.

A policy expert also raised national security concerns.

Niger Junta Claims to Thwart 24-Hour Mutiny with Help from Russian Mercenaries– www.breitbart.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

The military government of Niger, which seized power in a 2023 coup, claimed on Sunday it was able to suppress a violent 24-hour “mutiny” by disgruntled soldiers with the aid of Russian mercenaries.

The unrest began on Friday night with reports of gunfire exchanged between government forces and the insurgents in the vicinity of the main airport in Niamey, the capital city of Niger. The airport complex includes a military base and is located near the presidential palace.

The leaders of the mutiny included young special forces officers who were normally based outside Niamey. They launched simultaneous attacks on the Diori Hamani Airport, the presidential palace, and a national guard camp near the airport, as well as attempting to seize control of Niger’s public TV broadcaster.

The TV station remained off-air until 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, when a news anchor read a statement from Defense Minister Gen. Salifou Mody. The minister said, “a group of soldiers, in breach of military regulations, tried to detain some of their comrades at Base 101 in Niamey and opened fire on certain sensitive sites in the city of Niamey.”

“The prompt reaction of the defense and security forces made it possible to contain this heated moment, and they gradually took back control of these sites,” Mody said.

Reporters in Niamey said that despite these confident pronouncements, the mutineers actually remained in control of Air Base 101 until late Saturday afternoon, and they kept trying to convince senior officers to join their bid to overthrow junta boss Gen. Abdourahamane Tiani.

Trump threatens to ‘hit Iran hard’ as strikes resume after month-long lull– www.france24.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

US President Donald Trump threatened on Monday to hit Iran “hard” after the two foes traded fire for the first time in weeks, as his Treasury secretary vowed to keep up a pressure campaign aimed at hobbling Tehran’s economy.

After six months of war, the foes remain at an impasse, with Iran keeping the strategic Strait of Hormuz closed and the US persisting with a naval counter-blockade of Iranian ports.

On Sunday, the United States carried out strikes on an Iranian island in the Strait of Hormuz, with Tehran quickly retaliating by attacking US military targets in the Middle East.

The exchange raised fears of a return to major hostilities, with the US president vowing to respond.

“We’re going to hit them hard,” Trump said, according to a Fox News reporter who spoke to him briefly. “There will be a response.”

GOP Would Rather Cede Texas To Dems Than Its Own Voters– thefederalist.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Sometimes the GOP establishment is fairly crafty at hiding its disdain for voters. Other times, not so much.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., took a break from making folksy quips to let the mask slip during a Sunday interview about Texas’ Senate race between Republican Ken Paxton and Democrat James Talarico. While often unpredictable in its accuracy, public polling has shown the race to be one of the most contested in the country.

Yet, despite the race’s apparent closeness and major fundraising disparities between the two candidates, the milquetoast Kennedy wouldn’t commit to the Senate GOP deploying money to aid Paxton’s election. He said that the Senate GOP’s campaign arm simply doesn’t have the money to spend in Texas (after pouring millions into the state primary alongside other establishment forces to try and save incumbent Sen. John Cornyn).

“There’s no sense bubble wrapping it — we’ve got a race in Texas. … [Paxton] is going to have to point out the deficiencies of Mr. Talarico. … [But] you can’t win an election by saying the other guy’s worse than me. Money is an issue,” Kennedy said. “We in the Senate don’t have the money budgeted for Texas. We need help from the president. The president says he has $850 million in his campaign accounts. That’s a lot of jack.”

SO DUMB: California Now Planning to Force Companies to Disclose ‘Historic Links to Slavery’ * The Gateway Pundit * by Mike LaChance– www.thegatewaypundit.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

California has seen a mass exodus of companies from their state in recent years due to ridiculously high taxes, burdensome regulations, and the draconian lock down policies of Gavin Newsom during Covid-19.

Are they trying to fix any of this in order to retain the businesses that haven’t fled? Nope. In fact, they are about to make things even worse.

California is now planning to force companies to disclose any historic ties to slavery. Is Governor Newsom aware that California never even had slavery?

From the New York Post:

The bill is facing pushback from insurance companies, which argue it largely repeats an earlier California law requiring insurers to disclose past policies issued to slaveholders that covered the death or injury of enslaved people.

New York Life Insurance Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company and American International Group, known as AIG, were among the companies that disclosed ties to enslaved people and slaveholders.

Some reparations advocates have viewed the measure as a significant step forward, while others have questioned how much of an impact it would actually have.

The bill, known as Assembly Bill 2599, would require companies with more than $100 million in annual worldwide sales to search their records for evidence that they, their predecessors or subsidiaries bought or sold enslaved people or provided financial support for those transactions, including through insurance or loans.

The measure would only take effect if the Legislature sets aside funding for it, a requirement added through late amendments.

Once funding is allocated, the California Civil Rights Department would be required to create a digital platform for the disclosures.

Tehran urges return to June deal, Trump vows to hit Iran ‘hard’– www.cnbc.com
News Source
EXCERPT:

Oil prices extended gains Tuesday as traders mulled the threat of escalation, following the resumption of U.S.-Iran military strikes and more turmoil in the Strait of Hormuz.

A tanker was struck by three unknown projectiles while transiting Hormuz on Monday, according to an incident report from the the U.K. Maritime Trade Operations Centre.

Brent crude futures, the international benchmark, were up 1.6% to $91.90 a barrel by 8:19 a.m. ET. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures added 2% to $87.48 per barrel.

The tanker was sailing in the southern shipping lane close to the Omani coast, the UKMTO said, adding that no casualties were reported.

Iran launched an attack on two American bases in Jordan on Monday in retaliation for the U.S. strike on its Larak Island. American forces targeted two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island on Sunday, reportedly killing three, saying that Tehran intended to launch rockets carrying sea mines into the Hormuz Strait.