x02a2 Headlines Missed

California has officially used the doctrine that a child can choose their sex to take that child away from their parents. California now wants to put the girl up for adoption after the mother lost custody of her daughter in a court ruling. It is presumed the adopting adults most agree to transition the girl to a boy if she chooses to. The girl was 15 at the time she was placed into state custody.

The girl is the daughter of a Ukrainian immigrant, Alexandra Lyaschenko, who herself is hiding in Florida to prevent the state of California from taking her son into custody as well. The state of California also wants to put her son in the foster care system because his mother refuses to allow him to transition to a girl.

Go Deeper

Immigrations and Customs Enforcement have been using a Palantir tool to track far more than illegal aliens, critics allege. ICE has over 20 million people worldwide in a database that some suspect includes American citizens.

DHS told 404 Media, “U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is committed to achieving the nation’s mandate to clear the backlog of illegal aliens who pose a threat to the security of our communities. Like other law enforcement agencies, ICE employs various forms of technology while respecting civil liberties and privacy interests.”

Go Deeper

A Texas couple is suing OpenAI, alleging their product, ChatGPT, led to their son’s overdosing on drugs after following the AI platform’s advice.

OpenAI released this statement, “This is a heartbreaking situation, and our thoughts are with the family… ChatGPT is not a substitute for medical or mental health care, and we have continued to strengthen how it responds in sensitive and acute situations with input from mental health experts…”

Go Deeper

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced plans to phase of U.S. financial support of its military down to zero.

He stated, “I want to draw down to zero the American financial support, the financial component of the military cooperation that we have,” he said. “Because we receive – we receive $3.8 billion a year. And I – I think that it’s time that we weaned ourselves from the remaining military support.”

Go Deeper

Representative Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) publicly confessed to working with foreign governments to undermine U.S. policy in Cuba.

She declared, “I was in conversations with the ambassadors from Mexico and some other places, other countries in Latin America trying to figure out how to get oil there. I’ve called these sanctions an economic bombing of the infrastructure of Cuba.”

Go Deeper

There is a growing realization by many that the U.S. Supercarrier is no longer the decisive military advantage it once was. Now, more analysts are coming down on the side that claims the supercarrier’s days are gone or soon will be.

The rise of drones and supersonic missiles alone have significantly raised the price of carrier defense. The question is this, if the supercarrier era is in the fall of its reign, how far away is its winter? And what does that mean for U.S. power going forward?

Go Deeper

A former CCP agent told CBN News he was part of an operation to identify and silence former Chinese citizens in America who spoke out against the party. He told CBN they use threats, entrapment, and even kidnapping.

He claimed, “The United Front is something that’s being defined by the Chinese Communist Party as one of its ‘secret’ or ‘magic’ weapons. And essentially its task is two things: On the one hand, expand the circle of friends of the Chinese Communist Party. So, co-opting or influencing, politicians, media, academia, and entrepreneurs. But on the other hand, its task is also to crack down on critics, to silence them, to divide them.”

Go Deeper

After 5 years of having the “opportunity” to turn in their no-no guns and get paid in return, the time limit is running out. While the exact numbers are hard to find, the fact that the government has already extended the time limit three times tell you they’ve gotten themselves into an unenforceable situation, they lack the power to confiscate all the guns that haven’t been voluntarily turned in already.

Blair Hagen, an executive with the National Firearms Association, said the Canadian government has more problems than just non-compliance, saying, “We’re finding that they’re running into a lot of compliance issues,” said Blair Hagen, an executive with the National Firearms Association. They have no idea where [the guns are] or who has them. So it’s proving to be a very, very difficult situation for the government.”

Blurb:

Canadian Citizens Face Prison for Failing to Comply with ‘Voluntary’ Gun Buyback Scheme –  slaynews.com

Hundreds of thousands of Canadian gun owners could face prison sentences if they refuse to surrender newly prohibited firearms under a federal “buyback” program that critics say amounts to forced confiscation disguised as “voluntary” compliance.

Since May 2020, the Canadian government has pursued what it calls an “assault-style firearms compensation program,” banning thousands of firearms and offering payment to owners who turn them in.

Gun owners who fail to comply by October 2026 could face up to five years in prison for illegal possession.

Gun rights advocates and several provincial governments argue the program will overwhelmingly impact law-abiding citizens while doing little to curb crime.

“We’re finding that they’re running into a lot of compliance issues,” said Blair Hagen, an executive with the National Firearms Association.

“They have no idea where [the guns are] or who has them.

“So it’s proving to be a very, very difficult situation for the government.”

Trudeau’s Order-in-Council Ban

The firearm ban was enacted through an order-in-council issued in May 2020 by then–Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a mechanism that allows sweeping regulatory changes without a parliamentary vote.

Under the policy, participation in the buyback is described as “voluntary,” but compliance with the ban is mandatory.

“While participating in the program is voluntary, compliance with the law is not,” the federal government states on its website.

Firearm owners must “safely dispose of or permanently deactivate” prohibited weapons or risk criminal liability.

The government has extended an amnesty for possession three times, with the current deadline set for October 30, 2026.

‘Voluntary’ in Name Only

Gun rights groups dispute the government’s framing.

“If the option is either turn them in or you’re going to jail, I would not consider that voluntary,” said Justin Davis, public affairs director for the National Rifle Association.

The federal government also does not guarantee compensation, stating only that owners “may receive compensation subject to availability of program funds.”

Carney Denies Confiscation

Globalist Prime Minister Mark Carney has repeatedly denied that the policy constitutes confiscation.

“This is not about confiscation,” Carney said during a podcast interview in September 2025.

“This is about voluntary return of firearms for compensation.”

Carney also claimed that the ban does not affect hunting rifles or sport-shooting firearms.

However, critics point out that the policy includes explicit carve-outs for Indigenous subsistence hunters, suggesting that commonly owned firearms are indeed affected.

Provinces Refuse to Enforce the Ban

Several provinces, including Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, and Yukon, have refused to assist federal authorities in enforcing the ban.

“We will have nothing to do with this program,” said Teri Bryant, Alberta’s chief firearms officer.

“We will not spend any Alberta taxpayer dollars on this program.”

As a result, federal authorities would be responsible for enforcement without local law enforcement support.

“If the feds want to try and enforce it, they are going to have to do it themselves,” Hagen said.

“The logistics get even more insurmountable and the price goes up.”

Program Yields Minimal Results

A six-week pilot run in fall 2025 reportedly recovered just 25 firearms, far below the government’s expectation of roughly 200.

Despite that outcome, officials declared the pilot a success.

Hagen said the lack of public participation reflects widespread resistance among lawful gun owners.

“There is a civil disarmament agenda in that bureaucracy,” he said.

“It started many years ago.”

Warnings for the United States

Gun rights advocates argue the Canadian model is a cautionary tale for the United States.

“There’s no criminal in the world who’s going to turn in their firearm for a few dollars,” Davis said.

“These policies disarm law-abiding citizens and create more soft targets.”

Gun confiscation schemes are already backed by top Democrats.

During her failed 2019 presidential campaign, former Vice President Kamala Harris openly supported a mandatory gun buyback.

“We have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory gun buyback program,” Harris said at the time.

Advocates note that Canada lacks constitutional protections comparable to the Second Amendment.

“You can ban firearms on paper,” Hagen said, “but actually making confiscation happen is another thing entirely.”

Whether Canada’s program collapses under its own cost and complexity, or is repealed by a future government, remains an open question.

However, laws such as this one are almost always a one-way street.

READ MORE – Canadian Government Euthanizes Woman Against Her Will

from slaynews.com

In a taste of what’s to come, Switzerland’s Zurich city is leading the way in euthanasia law. Not only is it relatively easy to get assisted suicides in Zurich, now, EVERY elder care facility MUST have a suicide room, even if the religious ones. The initiative appears to be well-supported by the community.

Blurb:

City of Zurich will mandate assisted suicide option in every care home, including religious ones – lifesitenews.com

The Swissinfo article reported:

The cantonal government is generally in favour of assisted suicide in all retirement and nursing homes. It has drawn up a corresponding counter-proposal to the initiative “Self-determination at the end of life in retirement and nursing homes too.” This would mean that all homes would have to tolerate assisted suicide in the future.

READ: Disabled Canadian man chooses euthanasia due to loneliness, ‘psychosocial suffering’

This proposal, which requires every care home to provide assisted suicide, does not extend to psychiatric facilities and prisons. The article further explains:

The popular initiative challenges a cantonal decision in October 2022 that not all care homes should allow assisted suicide on their premises, but only those with a service mandate from a municipality. This considers religious care homes, that often reject euthanasia.

Blurb:

Long-term care facilities commonly prescribe antipsychotic drugs to elderly service users, often to treat behavioral issues associated with dementia. Despite a lack of evidence that these drugs are effective for older adults, and at least one study finding that antipsychotics exacerbate behavioral problems in nursing homes, prescription rates continue to climb.

While efficacy is questionable, the harmful effects associated with antipsychotic drugs in elderly populations is not. Antipsychotic prescriptions in elderly service users are linked to increased risk of pneumonia, stroke, kidney injury, blood clots, falls, bone fracture, heart attack, heart failure, anticholinergic reactions, parkinsonian events, tardive dyskinesia, orthostatic hypotension, cognitive slowing, and death.

Blurb:

“It makes absolutely no sense to talk about the US needing ⁠to take over Greenland. The US has no right to annex any of ​the three countries in the Danish Kingdom,” Frederiksen said in ‍a statement on Sunday.

The comments followed an interview published by The Atlantic magazine, in which Trump said: “We do need Greenland, absolutely. We need it for defence.”

On Saturday, the United States bombed Venezuela and toppled President Nicolas Maduro, raising concerns in Denmark that the same could happen with Greenland, a Danish territory.