04b Theory and Analysis

Source Link
Excerpt:

More than 100 million people could die if India and Pakistan began a devastating nuclear war, experts have warned.

An academic journal published in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists found tens of millions of people would perish “immediately” should tensions between the two countries result in nuclear weapons being used – while huge plumes of dust released into the Earth’s atmosphere could trigger famines that would affect “billions” around the world. It comes after India launched a barrage of ballistic missiles and drones into Pakistan early on Wednesday, killing at least 26 people. Pakistan described the strikes as an “act of war”, and claimed it shot down several Indian fighter jets in retaliation.

India fired missiles at Pakistan overnight in what it described as an anti-terror operation

Tensions have soared between the nuclear-armed neighbours over a deadly attack on tourists in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir, which India says was carried out by terror groups based in Pakistan.

Source Link
Excerpt:

“Both the Executive and the Judiciary have an obligation to follow the law.”

Those thirteen words, penned by Justice Samuel Alito on Holy Saturday, represent the first admission by the judiciary that courts too can wrongly flout the law.

Justice Alito’s stark acknowledgement concluded his bullet-point evisceration of the Supreme Court’s “unprecedented” command that President Trump not remove a “putative class of detainees” under the Alien Enemies Act. The Supreme Court had entered that order shortly after midnight after the American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”) filed an emergency application asking alternatively for an emergency injunction, an immediate administrative injunction, a writ of mandamus, or a stay of removal, to prevent the Trump Administration from removing Venezuelans to El Salvador pursuant to the Alien Enemies Act.

The ACLU’s scattershot request for relief from the Supreme Court came a mere two days after they sued the Trump Administration in a federal court in Texas — and before that court or the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had an opportunity to rule on the request for an injunction barring the removal of any more aliens to El Salvador.

Source Link
Excerpt:

 

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced that, as of today, a Real ID would be needed to fly anywhere in the country. This has been coming for ages now, but there are still a lot of people very upset about it.

I’m mostly ambivalent on the topic myself because I didn’t have a choice about getting one, but many screaming about them seem a tad selective in their outrage.

See, there are a lot of arguments against this out there, but one is that these requirements are burdensome and problematic for poorer Americans.

Of course, as someone who has lived more than a little lean in the income department a good chunk of my adult life, I’m not entirely sure where poor folks are flying to and from, because tickets on flights aren’t exactly cheap most of the time.

Yet there’s something else that seems to raise some questions about that line of reasoning, and that was framed pretty well by Second Amendment attorney Kostas Moros.

Source Link
Excerpt:

Twitter and Block co-founder Jack Dorsey has called for a radical change in the approach to intellectual property, proposing to completely abolish the relevant laws. His opinion was supported by Elon Musk, the current head of the social network X. This was reported by Mashable, writes UNN.

Details

On Friday, the co-founder of X (then Twitter) and Block (then Square) posted on X: “Delete all intellectual property laws.” Elon Musk, the current leader of X, commented: “I agree.”

Source Link
Excerpt:

The United States and China– two of the world’s largest economies– are locked in a dangerous trade stand-off that may have no winners. As the US tries to arm-twist China — with mounting tariffs– into seeking a deal from his administration, it is becoming increasingly clear that Beijing may have more leverage than President Donald Trump and his aides think.

The United States remains an almost irreplaceable market for China for its manufactured goods. However, experts caution Washington not to underestimate Beijing’s capacity to resist the Trump administration’s coercive tactics. The combination of Beijing’s centralised political control, diversified export markets and stronghold over some strategically vital materials, including rare earth metals and magnets, gives China plenty of room to negotiate with the US.

The complexity of the United States’ dependence on China was evident over the weekend when the Trump administration exempted smartphones, laptops and TVs from its new tariffs — goods that the US primarily imports from China.

Source Link
Excerpt:

There is a cancer in America’s military ranks, and it must be expunged before it’s too late. That cancer lies in uniformed service members’ widespread rejection of the uniquely American concept of civilian control of the military and disregard for the absolute necessity that America’s military officers remain apolitical in the face of the constitutional will of the electorate.

Recent events reveal this cancer, and they include the relief for cause of Navy Vice Adm. Shoshana Chatfield after she reportedly refused to hang photos of President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on her headquarters’ customary “Chain of Command” board and reportedly told her subordinates in a town hall that she would “wait [the Trump administration] out” the next four years. They also include the relief for cause of Col. Sussanah Meyers, commander of the U.S. Space Force’s base in Greenland, after she openly questioned (to all of her subordinates via email) Vice President J.D. Vance’s official pronouncements regarding the United States, Greenland, and Denmark.

Experts have only themselves to blame for the distrust of institutions– www.washingtonexaminer.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Now they tell us.

“We were badly misled about the event that changed our lives.” So reads the headline on Princeton professor Zeynep Tufekci’s March 16 article in the New York Times. The event was, of course, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the bad misleading came from scientists who purposefully discredited the now-widely accepted theory that the virus originated from a leak in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Perhaps not entirely coincidentally, the New York Times article appeared one day short of five years from the publication in Nature Medicine of an article by five scientists, led by Kristian Andersen, titled “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2.” “We do not believe,” the article states, “that any type of laboratory-based scenario is plausible.”

Roberts’ Obsession With SCOTUS Legitimacy Has Delegitimized It– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

The chief irony of Chief Justice John Roberts’ tenure at the Supreme Court is that the man so doggedly devoted to defending the judiciary has done so much to undermine it. In so doing, he has threatened not only the court’s legitimacy but the republic itself.

His latest such act wasn’t an abomination of a ruling on the level of Obamacare, the census citizenship question, or DACA; a faulty probe into a devastating leak; or a defense of the indefensible censorship-industrial complex. It was a terse three-line statement that may prove the most consequential — and corrosive — move of them all.

“For more than two centuries,” the chief justice wrote, “it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.”

Farmer uses his chickens to illustrate a 15-minute city– www.louderwithcrowder.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

You may have heard of the concept of a 15-minute city and are wondering what one is. Here is a farmer to explain with chickens.

Before we start, the idea of a “15-minute city” tends to be fodder for conspiracy theorists. As if there is a grand cabal of global elites looking to control people by limiting them to a fifteen-minute radius and use other dystopian methods to control every aspect of their lives. Get those dark thoughts out of your head.

As WikiPedia tells us, a 15-minute city is nothing more than an “urban planning concept in which most daily necessities and services, such as work, shopping, education, healthcare, and leisure can be easily reached by a 15-minute walk or bike ride from any point in the city” to “reduce car dependency, promote healthy and sustainable living, and improve the overall quality of life for city dwellers.”

Got it? Now here is the farmer with his chickens.

New Documentary ‘American Leviathan’ Pulls Back Curtain On Rise of the Bureaucratic State › American Greatness– amgreatness.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Conservative activist and founder of American Majority Ned Ryun has announced the release of the documentary “American Leviathan” that chronicles the rise of the American administrative state and Progressive authoritarianism.

Ryun’s documentary describes the American Leviathan as,”a massive, unaccountable administrative state that has subverted the Republic our Founders built,” and explains how we are currently witnessing an epic conflict between two very different forms of government in our nation.

The Supreme Court Has an Opportunity To Correct Its Kelo Eminent Domain Error – Reason
Source Link
Excerpt:

One of the U.S. Supreme Court may soon overturn one of its worst decisions in recent memory—a ruling that justified government stealing property from its owners to pass it to better-connected private parties. On Friday, the court will decide whether to consider a New York case that could upset the precedents set by Kelo v. New London, an eminent domain battle that prompted books, a movie, and state-level legal reforms. While Kelo was a loss for anybody who wants to set boundaries around government power, the court could take the opportunity this week to set things right with Bowers v. Oneida County Industrial Development Agency.

Why Millions Of Americans Are Tapping Their 401(k) Savings Early– finance.yahoo.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

A growing share of Americans are dipping into their retirement nest eggs to handle immediate financial challenges, underlining the economic strain many households are experiencing despite strong employment figures.

Last year, 4.8% of 401(k) account holders took early withdrawals for hardship reasons like paying medical bills or paying their home mortgage, according to data from Vanguard Group. It marks an all-time high, jumping from 3.6% the previous year and more than doubling the typical pre-COVID rate of about 2%.

emocrats Are Furious With Chuck Schumer – Mother Jones– www.motherjones.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

Activists stage a protest outside the office of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) following his support for a GOP funding bill.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In the wake of votes by a handful of key Democrats, led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, to pass a GOP-led continuing resolution funding federal operations through the end of September, fissures have expanded within the Democratic Party on how best to counter Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s ongoing assault on government agencies.

Top Democrats Demand Investigation Into DeJoy’s Secret Deal With Musk To Gut USPS– www.politicususa.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

House Democrats who oversee the USPS are concerned that the Trump administration is maneuvering to get around the law and gut the United Postal Service.

In a letter to House Oversight Committee chair James Comer (R-KY), twenty House Democrats led by Oversight Committee ranking member Gerry Connolly (D-VA) wrote:

We write to request that you convene an immediate hearing on the Trump Administration’s plans for the United States Postal Service (USPS). Since the Committee’s most recent hearing on the USPS, the Trump Administration has reportedly explored privatizing the USPS, firing the bipartisan Postal Board of Governors, merging the USPS into the Department of Commerce, and is now subjecting the USPS, America’s most trusted federal institution, to the chainsaw approach of Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). This broad assault on the independence of the USPS demands Congressional oversight, especially from the Committee with jurisdiction over the USPS.

On December 14, 2024, the Washington Post reported that President Trump was considering actions to privatize the USPS and push thousands of federal service employees out of their jobs in favor of a broad privatization of the agency’s essential services. Two months later, further reporting noted that President Trump was preparing plans to fire the bipartisan Postal Board of Governors and “merge” the Postal Service into the Commerce Department, “potentially throwing the 250-year-old mail provider and trillions of dollars of e-commerce transactions into turmoil.”

Nothing Can Erase Corporate Media’s Complicity In Covid Scandal– thefederalist.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

The New York Times turned to a popular strategy from the propaganda press playbook this week when it published what it wanted Americans to believe was a mea culpa declaring, “We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives.”

There is no doubt that the chaos and tyranny that went down in 2020 “changed our lives.” People were denied the ability to grieve their dead, told not to celebrate holidays with family and friends, masked to give birth without the support of a spouse, ripped out of classrooms to stare at a screen, and segregated from society based on their jab status.

Trump must defy rogue judges or risk a failed presidency– www.theblaze.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

 

If a federal judge told President Trump to deliver a specifically curated speech and then pull down his pants on live television, should he comply? If he refused, would that trigger a “constitutional crisis”? If you pay attention to the left, the answer might very well be “yes”!

The only “constitutional crisis” we face is the erroneous idea that the judiciary is atop the food chain rather than on equal footing with the other two branches of government. If Trump hopes to succeed this time around, he had better remind the judiciary of its impotence to enforce unconstitutional edicts.

Granting courts ultimate veto power over public policy creates a judicial supremacy the Founders never intended.

Federal judges have repeatedly attempted to restrict Trump’s presidential authority with overreaching demands. They have ordered the administration to fund private foreign aid organizations, reinstate specific personnel, and publish designated information on government websites. In one case, a judge even directed the secretary of defense to retract a statement on the Pentagon’s policy regarding transgender troops. And over the weekend, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg attempted to block the deportation of violent gang members under the Alien Enemies Act.

?u=https%3A%2F%2Fc1.staticflickr.com%2F5%2F4326%2F35962798685_0d22812a01.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=d008f7ffd5e39b5da03f5219f844eda08d0b5800bd638e0512330f634c852d16&ipo=images

Originally published February 28, 2025 for our End-of-Month Issue of Mindful Intelligence Advisor.  Subscribe to get semi-monthly issues.

By Paul Gordon Collier, Editor

“Moreover, Josiah put away the mediums and the necromancers and the household gods and the idols and all the abominations that were seen in the land of Judah and in Jerusalem, that he might establish the words of the law that were written in the book that Hilkiah the priest found in the house of the Lord.

Before him there was no king like him, who turned to the Lord with all his heart and with all his soul and with all his might, according to all the Law of Moses, nor did any like him arise after him. Still, the Lord did not turn from the burning of his great wrath, by which his anger was kindled against Judah, because of all the provocations with which Manasseh had provoked him.

And the Lord said, ‘I will remove Judah also out of my sight, as I have removed Israel, and I will cast off this city that I have chosen, Jerusalem, and the house of which I said, My name shall be there.’” 2 Kings 23:24-27

Our Political & Cultural Correspondent Joshua Bontrager brought it to our attention that there seems to be a rise of what might be called “whore culture” in the “conservative movement,” a casual sex culture that seems out of step with what American conservatism has traditionally been.

Writing for AGENDA Weekly, Joshua reported: On Valentines Day, conservative influencer Ashley St. Clair posted on X, “Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father. I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child’s privacy and safety, but in recent days, it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause.”

St. Clair said, “I am a good mom… My child is the most perfect thing that happened to me. I wouldn’t change anything.”

Musk, who is the father of 12 previous children by three women, has refused to comment on the allegations. But multiple conservatives responded with congratulatory notes, including former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), who wrote, “This child has incredible genetics.”

Christian podcaster Allie Beth Stuckey responded, “Babies are ALWAYS a blessing, no matter what. But I am genuinely heartbroken by the purposeful creation of motherless or fatherless children, and it feels weird publicly applauding that.” Stuckey added, “We need more stable families.”

The Blazes Delano Squires lamented, “Stripping marriage from the family formation equation paves the way for commercial surrogacy, unregulated IVF, and same-sex adoption. This shift has consequences… The belief that a man’s bank account can replace his presence in the home ignores a fundamental truth: Fatherhood is about more than money.”

President Donald Trump, the de facto flag bearer of American conservatism, has a history of affairs and broken marriages attested to by fathering five children born to three different women.

In Germany, the AfD, the current standard bearer for German conservatism, is led by Alice Weidel, who happens to be married to a woman herself, living an openly lesbian lifestyle.

Britain’s then-Prime minister Boris Johnson openly lambasted SCOTUS after it overthrew Roe v Wade, telling CNN’s Jake Tapper that he “supports a woman’s right to choose.”

He clarified, “I want to stress that this is not our court, it’s not our jurisdiction. So, in a sense, it’s for the United States, it’s not for the U.K. But the Roe v. Wade judgment, when it came out, was important psychologically for people around the world, and it spoke of the advancement of the rights of women, I think. And I regret what seems to me to be a backward step. But I’m speaking as someone looking in from the outside.”

Edmund Burke, considered by many to be the “father” of conservatism (which emerged as a response to the “liberal” claims that led to the French Revolution), makes it clear what is at the heart of Western conservatism with these two separate quotes:

“Despots govern by terror. They know that he who fears God fears nothing else; and therefore they eradicate from the mind, through their Voltaire, their Helvetius, and the rest of that infamous gang, that only sort of fear which generates true courage.”

“There is but one law for all, namely that law which governs all law, the law of our Creator, the law of humanity, justice, equity – the law of nature and of nations. “

Burke’s conservatism is not the same as Musk’s or Trump’s or Weidel’s conservatism, all three of which, in word and/or deed, deny the Christian cultural values that formed Western conservatism. For Trump and Musk, maybe, that foundation is the Constitution, which was the product of a Christian presuppositional worldview that all men are made in the image of God, all men are sinners in need of a Savior, all men are limited by their own humanity, and thus our government should reflect these Godly assumptions.

Weidel’s “conservatism” seems little more than some form of Enlightenment nationalism wrested on the bedrock of human speculation alone, not God’s laws, not revelatory wisdom, but human-constructed wisdom (the process of “knowing,” or defining for oneself, good and evil).

Like the humanists that smuggle in “oughtness” (assumed universal right actions) with uses of undefined words like “good” and “flourishing,” this godless conservatism smuggles in oughtness with undefined words like “freedom” and “liberty.”

Unlike Burke, who wrested his worldview assumptions about the universal good from revelatory wisdom (from scripture), these “modern” conservatives attribute the universal goods to human understanding alone.

This writer imagines that something similar was going on in Judah over 2500 years ago when King Josiah began what would be the last great reform of Judah before its final collapse. The comparison isn’t perfect because, in this case, Josiah was a righteous ruler who understood the foundation of governance wisdom, the Word of God.

While President Trump gives credit to God for saving his life in the PA assassination attempt, he is hardly a paradigm of a righteous ruler that will lead a nation to repent and seek salvation from the Lord alone.

Still, the fact that Josiah was a righteous ruler, in word and deed, who led a reform that would prove to be a mile wide and an inch deep, he serves as even MORE of a stark warning to Americans here and now. If our American reform is led by an unrighteous man, what makes you think this reform will be more than superficial when not even a righteous ruler like Josiah could make his reform deep?

This writer does not align himself with conservatives, or conservatism in general, though that is based on my philosophical disagreements with them, not necessarily the fruit of Western conservatism. I believe Western conservatism is the philosophical justification (at least the attempted justification) for a Christian cultural reality.

It is that foundation, Christian culturalism, if you will, that I hold in common with conservatives, but not because of the republic of letters, the logical, reasonable, common-sense speculations of men, but because of God’s divinely inspired Word, Scriptures.

Burke’s engagement with the French Revolution unwittingly gave rise to the justification for the removal of the true root of Western conservatism in how he justified his pushback on the ideas being espoused and cut into flesh during the bloody affair.

Burke was the product of the rise of the “republic of letters,” which is the rise of human linguistic wordcraft over the received wisdom of the Word of God. As such, rather than simply appealing to the Word as a rebuke of the evils being espoused and practiced by the violent revolutionaries, Burke appealed to the same false gods many conservatives of today appeal to: logic, reason, and even “common sense.”

Burke affirmed the revolutionaries’ true foundation, linguistic wordcraft, by appealing to logic, reason, and common sense over the revelatory wisdom of God’s word. Even though Burke would not be considered a liberal today, his apologetic in defense of a revelatory-based governance wisdom source laid the groundwork for the complete undoing of that foundation, so that now conservatives in America appeal far more to the Bill of Rights to justify their beliefs than they do the Word of God.

The fact that there now exists a distinct subset of “conservatism” in almost every Western nation called “Christian conservatism” should demonstrate to you just how far afield whatever Western “conservatism” has become (liberal enlightenment humanism, by the way).

It has veered so far from its roots that it can no longer be called conservatism as, at this point, what it wants doesn’t exist, and what used to exist, Christian culturalism, it no longer wants either. It is a new thing, not a preservation of tradition.

As this writer has declared in past reports and even Final Thoughts, America’s great reformation that is currently underway will not produce lasting results. Rather, it will hasten the demise of the American republic, officially. The only person that can “save” America is the only person that can save me, or any of you, Christ.

This comes from a repentant, humbled heart, poor in spirit in comparison to the recognition of God’s great Spirit, mourning, for we see the fallenness of the world just as God sees it, and meek in recognition that it is not by our works, but God’s, lest we should boast. (Ephesians 2:8-9)

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Proverbs 9:10), which begins with a recognition of your fallen nature and your need for a Savior. If your root is “freedom,” “equity,” “liberty,” “goodness,” or “flourishingness,” then your root is in human linguistic wordcraft, not truth.

Let us ourselves repent and turn to Christ to save our nation and pray that our leaders, starting with President Trump, do the same. Whatever their unrighteous past says about these “leaders,” the empty tomb invites them all to repentance and a turning away from the temptation to “know good and evil” for themselves.

These are leaders of the republic of letters, not sons and daughters of God. Let us hope God leads these men to Him or gives us truly godly leaders, for a good leader is a blessing on the land.

“When the righteous thrive, the people rejoice; but when the wicked rule, the people groan.”  –Proverbs 29:2

Trump Is Right on the White House Correspondents’ Association—and Speaker Johnson Should Follow Suit– freebeacon.com
Source Link
Excerpt:

It’s been a lousy week for the White House Correspondents’ Association. President Donald Trump cut the organization off at the knees when he announced on Tuesday that the White House, not the WHCA, would select the members of the presidential press pool, the rotating group of reporters and photographers who cover the president in places like the Oval Office and Air Force One where space is tight. Cue the hysterics.

The White House has always had the discretion to grant or deny reporters access to White House grounds and, once on those grounds, over which reporters are called on in press briefings. It stands to reason that the White House has the right to decide which outlets get access to tight space that the White House itself is providing.

But taking control of the press pool, the WHCA says, is an assault on the First Amendment. “In a free country, leaders must not be able to choose their own press corps,” the organization’s president Eugene Daniels said Tuesday, shortly after announcing his departure from Politico for MSNBC. “For generations, the working journalists elected to lead the White House Correspondents’ Association board have consistently expanded the WHCA’s membership and its pool rotations to facilitate the inclusion of new and emerging outlets.”